PLA Air Force news, pics and videos

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
CSIS: 90% of USAF, JASDF & ROCAF aircraft will be lost to Chinese missiles on the ground.
Here is the 165-page report for those who has the patience:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ah lol, it's that wargame from CSIS.

Although yes, large numbers of material incl. planes will be destroyed on the ground nor will there be a battle for air supremacy over Taiwan, since the PLAAF is gonna that pretty darn soundly and will defeat any challengers.
 

stannislas

Junior Member
Registered Member

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
AKF-98 likely also has an anti ship capability if not variant.
Would be great if the AKF-98 can become the fully-fledged Chinese counterpart to the LRASM.

Based on estimations that I could gather online, the AKF-98 seen in Zhuhai 2022 has a dimension of ~3.88 meters (length) x ~0.45 meters (height) x ~0.72 meters (width).

If the estimations are correct, then it should allow the J-20s and J-35/31s to carry the AKF-98s inside their internal weapons bays. This is a great plus when compared to the US' LRASM, which is too big for F-35's internal weapons bay.

However, the shorter length of the AKF-98 relative to the LRASM could also mean a shorter range for the latter, but it could be a compromise for better degree of stealthiness for the J-20s and the J-35/31 compared to the F-35 when carrying such munitions.

~~~~~(The following are just some food-for-thought comments of my own, and is also deviating from the thread topic.)~~~~~

In the meantime, the purported dimension of the AKF-98 should allow it to fit inside the UVLS of the 052Ds and 055s as well, if plans to adopt AKF-98 for naval platforms does exist. With the present length of just nearly 4 meters, I believe the missile can be lengthened to fit inside the 7-meter-deep and 9-meter-deep UVLS of the 052Ds and 055s for even greater strike ranges.

Perhaps China can also get her own stealthy variant of Block V Tomahawks (with both land-attack and anti-ship capabilities) too from the AKF-98...
 
Last edited:

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
I will be very surprised if it's the case.

While LRASM and JASSM have same airframes, they're very different inside - which is normally suboptimal, but works with a rather unique LRASM setup. Most importantly, LRASM was needed soon enough.

Chinese ASCM setup is simply different, and there are no same problems that forced LRASM and NSM to exist.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Would be great if the AKF-98 can become the fully-fledged Chinese counterpart to the LRASM.

Based on estimations that I could gather online, the AKF-98 seen in Zhuhai 2022 has a dimension of ~3.88 meters (length) x ~0.45 meters (height) x ~0.72 meters (width).

If the estimations are correct, then it should allow the J-20s and J-35/31s to carry the AKF-98s inside their internal weapons bays. This is a great plus when compared to the US' LRASM, which is too big for F-35's internal weapons bay.

I think your measurements are a bit off/small tbh, and I very much doubt AKF98 will be carried internally in J-20/35 weapons bays. A new clean sheet air launched missile would be developed for internal carriage by it.
 
Top