North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Janiz

Senior Member
:eek:
How difficult it is for some people to get along with simple fact, what NKorea actually is capable of something by herself.
Because they're being provided with everything they need (coming from US or Japan, or whatever thing they need) via Chinese enterprises. That's a fact and there's no room for discussion. Even recently Chinese company was fined a huge amount of cash by US because of that... And I'm sure there's much more of that stuff and it was just a warning shot from US towards PRC. Not to mention that you can transport everything by the border - which in fact is a few feets deep river on most of the cases.

To think that US uses it's own cash to sponsor Kim's regime - that's plainly stupid. They sponosored the other Korea and now it's capable of making their own money.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Few posts back you said
lol. There's only one player who keeps that country alive and provides it with technology that's enough to construct nuclear warheads. And it isn't US. Japan can only play this card in the process of getting their place in East Asia again, but they aren't the ones who made it.
And now you say
Because they're being provided with everything they need (coming from US or Japan, or whatever thing they need) via Chinese enterprises. That's a fact and there's no room for discussion. Even recently Chinese company was fined a huge amount of cash by US because of that... And I'm sure there's much more of that stuff and it was just a warning shot from US towards PRC. Not to mention that you can transport everything by the border - which in fact is a few feets deep river on most of the cases.

To think that US uses it's own cash to sponsor Kim's regime - that's plainly stupid. They sponosored the other Korea and now it's capable of making their own money.

So you are blaming China for US and Japan's fault (source of tech)? Why don't you blame US and Japan for letting those what ever tech loose? Those tech that can help constructing nukes are surely not for sell to anyone, neither does China herself need to steal as China already had her nukes, nor could Japans possess something that China is much more advanced.

And I mark your word that "there is no room for discussion" about your stated source of NK "nukes" being US and Japan.

Ordinary people do forget things they say some months or years ago, but not minutes ago. You keep on amazing the rest of us. Please face up to yourself, then face the reality.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Now why is it that the US government are no longer interested in a Korean Peninsula lasting peace?
A Lasting peace could only really happen under reunification. as that is the goal of both North and south. the problem is That for both parties that means establishing their hegemony over the other. one nation 2 systems has never worked.
lol. There's only one player who keeps that country alive and provides it with technology that's enough to construct nuclear warheads. And it isn't US. Japan can only play this card in the process of getting their place in East Asia again, but they aren't the ones who made it.
Bogus!
The Nuclear program of the NK is a long one dating back to the 1960's when they started it to counter the US Aide to the ROK, The North koreans went to Both Russia and the PRC for help in a Nuclear bomb but were rebuffed.

They did however get help from both in learning Nuclear power. Although they never seem to have implemented it as North Korea still has almost no maintained electric power grid. All evidence indicate that the DPRK was looking to leverage what they were learning the hard way to a Bomb.
:eek:
How difficult it is for some people to get along with simple fact, what NKorea actually is capable of something by herself.
Then Comes A.Q.Khan Father of the Pakistani Nuclear program He is known to have traveled widely including a number of Business trips to Pyongyang and has been confirmed as exchanging nuclear secrets with a number of nations. It's possible he may have also been involved in the Kim's bomb.

Of Course in the end, by the late 1990's The South Korean conventional military power hit a point that they could in a conventional war take the North korean conventional forces. The North needed a nonconventional advantage to keep the game fixed.
For decades the US built up South Korea to keep the North at bay,
For Decades the USSR and then China has built up the North To keep the US at bay.
The Chinese have used North Korea as a buffer state, They don't want a Nation with very good US relations and US Bases sitting on there boarder. So they pump cash to the North via Black, Grey and white trade. but that is not there only means of making money
Despite Claims to the Contrary North Korea has external economic dealings in Angola, Algeria, Benin, Botswana, Cambodia, Chad,Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Germany, Iran, Malaysia, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Russia, Senegal, Togo, Zimbabwe just to name a few
Most are minor some are major. Some are military. North Korean conventional and Chemical arms have been seen in Syria. Cuba was caught smuggling Fighter parts from North Korea, and A number of Iranian officials have been on hand for North Korean missile and nuclear tests.

They also have the Joint economic district with South Korea meant as an olive branch is also a life line into the North Korean state.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Why would Japan needs such a large navy when the DPRK doesn't have none, so there's no threat that Japan will get invaded by the North Koreans any time soon (Red Dawn in Tokyo) via naval ships? Again the article is about the US missed opportunity to create trust in order to provide a mutual understanding between to the parties. Instead it does the opposite?

For your 1st question i can answer you same for China... South Korea also countries are free ofc.

The size of the Japan Navy have no relation with North Korea
Japan have since very long time a big Navy about a Century and actual Fleet has been constituted for protect sea line civil ships, convoy with USSR thread and as Japan have very few natural resources import almost all the 3th now 4th economy need for it a big Navy for it, in more it is an island country.

mutual understanding between
There you dream with this dictator...
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
For your 1st question i can answer you same for China... South Korea also countries are free ofc.

The size of the Japan Navy have no relation with North Korea
Japan have since very long time a big Navy about a Century and actual Fleet has been constituted for protect sea line civil ships, convoy with USSR thread and as Japan have very few natural resources import almost all the 3th now 4th economy need for it a big Navy for it, in more it is an island country.


There you dream with this dictator...
You missed the context. That 1st question was in response to an earlier post which you failed to quote. Taking that in to the picture, you would see that the 1st question was not really questioning whether Japan should or should not have a big navy, it is instead a counter argument to the "irrelevance" of the earlier post. See the screen dump
The earlier post which brought Japan into the NK nuke issue. Japan was never part of the article that Equation posted.
1.PNG
The "1st question" which questioned the relevance of bringing in Japan.
2.PNG
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-3-26_20-26-21.png
    upload_2017-3-26_20-26-21.png
    85.2 KB · Views: 4

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
You missed the context. That 1st question was in response to an earlier post which you failed to quote. Taking that in to the picture, you would see that the 1st question was not really questioning whether Japan should or should not have a big navy, it is instead a counter argument to the "irrelevance" of the earlier post. See the screen dump
The earlier post which brought Japan into the NK nuke issue. Japan was never part of the article that Equation posted.
View attachment 37313
The "1st question" which questioned the relevance of bringing in Japan.
View attachment 37314
I am not here for do nia nia nia... but for it i post in more i still ignore you.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I am not here for do nia nia nia... but for it i post in more i still ignore you.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Then stay on topic and avoid (if you can) taking other's post out of context.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

You have a problem dude :D Smiley mur - Copie.PNG

In more much more interesting than your capable to provide :rolleyes:

Keep your sarcasms for yourself.
Stop it search me or i' ll report again...( pattern harassing posts, trolling, get yunder your skin, i have choice ... )
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

You have a problem dude :D View attachment 37328

In more much more interesting than your capable to provide :rolleyes:

Keep your sarcasms for yourself.
Stop it search me or i' ll report again...( pattern harassing posts, trolling, get yunder your skin, i have choice ... )
If you think you are free to "taking other's post out of context", while other's pointing that out is harassing, so be it and do as you wish, it is your problem.

BTW, do you really understand the bold text?
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
If you think you are free to "taking other's post out of context", while other's pointing that out is harassing, so be it and do as you wish, it is your problem.

BTW, do you really understand the bold text?
You amuse me much yes u make me laugh really :D i know you perfectly able to answer indefintely for not military things in general on Japanes thread by example as u do " regularly ", you have begin here ofc normaly to me have the last post but u want absolutely get reason so i play as u now and i want see if ur capable to be a bit inteligent and stop...:cool:
 
Top