Damn, look at that fleet 
North Korea Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter FORBIN
- Start date
-
- Tags
- north korea
What's the systems name?Damn, look at that fleet
View attachment 133654View attachment 133655View attachment 133656View attachment 133657
Kimskander
Those are not that. ATACMS sized close range quasi ballistic missiles.Kimskander
Nope, those are, as @yugocrosrb95 points out, smaller, 200km-ish, mass-produced hwasong-11d.Kimskander
Kimskander(kn-23),with it's complex true SRBM trajectories and delicate chemistry, can't come even close to this level of spam.
Same reason why gmlrs is so successful.
Apology if I came off as smug, but I mean what I asked as genuine questions. Every other source seem to indicate bulsae-1 as malyutka, 2 as fagot. You seem quite confident about this so I presume you must be in the know.
Every other source is outdated.
Problem with narrative that Bulsae-1 is Malyutka is because North Korea operated Shmel before it that was first ATGM by Russia/Soviet Union.
It is entirely possible they called their first ATGM per the Russian name way back, before name convention Bulsae was adopted. Like T-34-85, I dont recall it getting a Korean name since it was so old.
My 2nd guess, and this is only a guess: Bulsae is a name reserved for ones they fully mastered production technique with. Same goes for other 'Korean named weapons'. Chonma tanks were named, but the predecessors (like T-54, T-34-85)were not. I don't claim this is true, this is my guess only.
"We already have Lancet and Harop at home, Great Leader."
Lancet and Harop at home:
Lancet and Harop at home: