Skywatcher
Captain
Huawei could have licensed some amount of IP to Jio, for all we know.
News on China's scientific and technological development.
- Thread starter Quickie
- Start date
Yeah it was written by a supapowan.
TikTok’s parent ByteDance has decided it won’t sell or transfer the algorithm behind the video-sharing app in any sale or divestment, the South China Morning Post reported, citing a source briefed on the Chinese company’s boardroom discussions.
The company will not hand out the source code behind the social media platform but the company’s U.S. based technology team would be free to develop a new algorithm, the newspaper said, adding that this would be a condition for a sale of the company’s U.S. assets.
The company will not hand out the source code behind the social media platform but the company’s U.S. based technology team would be free to develop a new algorithm, the newspaper said, adding that this would be a condition for a sale of the company’s U.S. assets.
When Google wanted access again I remember China wanted to review its source code, of course Google said NO.
This is what happens when an Asian uses Western platforms:
Whites will be promoted while Asians are left to only be audience. Asians must have their own platform moderated by Asians.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
If you remember, Google didn't even allow their Google employees in China access to their source code while every other Google office in the world encouraged their employees to use their code to create new ideas for them. Why did they even bother having an office in China? So it made it look like Google was employing Chinese so that the government would let them in?
So oracle won the tiktok bid.
Besides the Oracle and Ticktok deal, the other Major Update is that Nvidia just bought ARM for $40B.
What are the implications of this for ARM China?
What are the implications of this for ARM China?
Arm China is spun off as seperate company. So nothing. In the medium run, Alibabas risc v will likely be a very viable contender to challenge ARM.
Here is a good piece on dual circulation by CSIS. Keep in mind they are a DC think tank. But I think their work on analyzing dual circulation is pretty fair:
My general feeling is that the supply side reforms to restructure the economy to produce for domestic consumption as opposed for export, will be easier than boosting domestic demand which requires higher income/productivity increases at an individual level. If someone who has more knowledge in economics can chime in that would be great.
My general feeling is that the supply side reforms to restructure the economy to produce for domestic consumption as opposed for export, will be easier than boosting domestic demand which requires higher income/productivity increases at an individual level. If someone who has more knowledge in economics can chime in that would be great.