T-34 had its roots to US Christie, but none of its basics were US. If some models had US lend-lease minor equipment like radios, it hardly prevented germans to reserve engineer it.
It hardly prevented germans to reserve engineer it.
The T-34 engine isnt aluminum, being a diesel. What it got from Walther Christie was the suspension design, itself not used in any American tank.
crobato, although I never verified the author's claim, but seems that he has some credit:
"It is in place to note in this connection that Winston Churchill named three best kinds of World War II weapons: the British Browning gun, the German Messerschmitt-190 plane and the Soviet T-34 tank. The German generals Erich Schneider and Heinz Guderian said it was a masterpiece of weaponry.[5] Specifically, General Guderian stressed that attempts made by German designers to replicate the T-34 tank had failed because the aluminum case of its diesel engine was unreplicable."
Kilo, fisheads claims are not supported by the info. we have established the following facts leangth 60.6cm claimed penetration 85cm (Fishehad claims the PLA wont use its DU round so the pic is of the tungesten round) velocity 1780m/s with that info we can extrapolate the rest of the information. if it is a long rod penetrator (western style) it will come in 11.5K or so joules per mm of RHAe and weigh more and have a thinner L/D ratio (30/1). If it is a short rod then it come sin around 10.1K joule per mm of RHAe witha thicker L/D (16/1) but weigh less.
If you use the Russian model you end up with a round that is far to light to achieve the claimed results.