drunkmunky
Junior Member
I understand a polarized perspective with critical breakdown to PLA tank development and the issues that need to be addressed with future development but ffs Godzilla?
Disqualified.
Disqualified.
I understand a polarized perspective with critical breakdown to PLA tank development and the issues that need to be addressed with future development but ffs Godzilla?
Disqualified.
And you are suggesting that the Chinese should stop there and be content with what they have? That is pretty funny don't you think.
No, Even China has finite resources, and a lot of areas still badly in need of modernizing. A tank fleet adaquately provided with a mid- to late- 1990s MBT would not, I think, be the most important area to spend that resource.
Also, I think the most likely areas where Chinese AFV might fight other AFV in the next 10-15 years would be:
1. North Korea - highly doubtful North Korea could compete with the existing type 99
2. China-India border - highly doubtful main battle tanks could make it up there.
I understand that China had finite resources and there are areas that needed modernizing. And developing a better MBT is not just for their own internal uses, there is a market out there that had needs of new and better tanks rather than the old T-72. And developing that new tank doesn't mean to dump money into a groundless hole, there will be returns and the returns are going to be great.
Do note that China don't just have border sharing with India and North Korea. And my statement still stands, even if China had the best tanks (which she does not, by the way) in Asia and parts of Europe, it would be plain silly to just stand still without any further development of newer and better tanks and equipment, that mindset is something that would destroy an advance civilization to 'barbarians'.
China is a huge place, with very varied topography, a tank suitable for the north china plain would be sub-optimal for use in south china. Their current mix of tanks seems to have most of the bases covered. Fundamentally, their strategic problem is not the fulda gap or the deserts of the middle east.
A bigger badder tank would really only be needed in numbers in a sino-russian conflict. In a shooting war with North Korea the Chinese would have air superiority, the Sino-Indian border is hardly tank territory.
Besides the Chinese seem to putting their Yuan into attack helos which is arguably a better way of blunting an armour assault.
Please tell me which country in Asia and Europe has better tank than China in significant number. For example even Challenger 2 may be a better tank than Type 99, but the British has only ~300 in operational, so an insignificant number!