*New J-10 Thread*

Status
Not open for further replies.

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
that article has no real value, anyhow, found this on Chinese forums + some more pictures of J-10s. Not sure if these photos have been posted before.
1021jan1ow3.jpg

41151jan1oq7.jpg

41153jan1ey4.jpg

41252jan1og4.jpg

j10jf17jan1vi8.jpg
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
from CDF, an article by PLA's own newspaper.
军报证实两架J-10打败4架苏凯战机

2006-12-30 10:26:23 解放军报     

军报北京12月 29日电张金玉、特约记者徐汇东报道:迎着即将到来的新年曙光,共和国蓝天翱翔着一群群威武的新式战机。首批装备我国自主研制生产的新一代歼—10战斗机的我空军航空兵部队,经过科学改装训练,如今已成建制形成实战能力。记者今天从权威部门获悉,歼—10战斗机目前已批量装备部队,这对于有效提高我空军防卫作战能力,加快我军武器装备现代化建设步伐具有重大意义。

此前,记者在西北某机场目睹了新一代歼—10战斗机叱咤长空的风采。蓝天白云下,两架铁灰色的歼—10战斗机短距滑跑,同时跃起。天空上,它们时而腾跃、俯冲,像鹰隼般迅猛;时而盘旋、翻滚,似飞燕般灵巧。这时,指挥部通报: “敌”4架第三代战机以密集编队突破我防空阵地。一声令下,两架歼—10战斗机风驰电掣直飞截击空域。很快,前方传来捷报:两架歼—10战斗机与“敌”机在长空较量4个回合,均先“敌”发现、先“敌”锁定、先“敌”开火,空战对抗取得全胜战绩。

歼—10战斗机,是我国自主研制生产的新一代多用途战斗机,分单座、双座两种。为了它的诞生,我国军工战线的科研人员艰苦奋斗,采用了大量新设计、新技术、新工艺,创造了共和国航空史上数十个 “第一”。我人民空军试飞员承担了数十项极限试飞任务,对数百个课题、数千个参数,进行上千架次的试飞检验,圆满完成了定型试飞任务,确保歼—10战斗机按时装备部队。

首批成建制装备歼—10战斗机的我空军航空兵部队,先后组织了战斗特技、对地攻击、单机进攻、双机空战、编队出击、导弹攻击和防御战术机动等多个课题训练,多次参加和组织复杂气象条件下的紧急机动、远程奔袭、空中对抗、海空联合作战以及复杂电磁环境下的全员、全装、全要素、全过程对抗演练,创新出多套克敌制胜的新战法,比原计划缩短一半时间形成实战能力。
Note, it mentions 2 J-10s beating 4 sukhoi fighters as the title, but I think that's the title mentionned by the person who posted this article rather than pla's own newspaper article. Anyhow, it means 4 3rd generation fighters getting intercepted by 2 J-10s and the J-10s were able to find the opposing fighters first, lock on first and shoot down the opposing fighters first. Considering the only "3rd" generation fighters in plaaf are flankers and J-10s, those 3rd generation fighters have to be flankers. Also note, it mentions that this happened in NorthWestern part of China, which was also the locations of all of the previous leaked J-10s beating flankers stories.

also from avic1 website, saying that J-10 has already been introduced to the service and have achieved combat status.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

本报讯(记者李雨农 承京)记者从中国航空工业第一集团公司了解到,我国自主研制生产的新一代战机——歼十已批量装备部队,形成战斗力。

歼十飞机是中国一航从1986年开始研制的。由中国一航成都飞机设计所设计、中国一航成都飞机工业公司研制生产。歼十飞机研制成功是航空工业各有关单位通力合作的结果,并得到了国防科工委、总装、空军等单位的大力支持。

中国一航有关领导告诉记者,歼十战斗机是我国自行研制具有自主知识产权的新一代战机,它采用了大量的新技术、新工艺,性能先进,用途广泛。歼十飞机分单座和双座两种,首批装备该飞机的空军航空兵部队,已成建制形成作战能力,对有效提高空军防卫作战能力,加快我军武器装备现代化建设,巩固国防具有重大意义
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Considering the only "3rd" generation fighters in plaaf are flankers and J-10s, those 3rd generation fighters have to be flankers.

Exept that Flankers belongs to the fourth generation. The third generation (Phantom generation) is represented in PLAAF trough J8II...

So unless the chinese "third" generation actually means the fourth generation, these planes reportetly "intercepted" weren't Flankers...
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Exept that Flankers belongs to the fourth generation. The third generation (Phantom generation) is represented in PLAAF trough J8II...

So unless the chinese "third" generation actually means the fourth generation, these planes reportetly "intercepted" weren't Flankers...
yes, in Chinese standards, su-27/J-10/teens/M2K is 3rd generation and J-7/J-8/Mig-23/F-4/F-5 are all 2nd generation. F-22/F-35 are considered to be 4th rather than 5th generation.

Also, there is an interesting thread going here
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that claims J-10 achieved a kill ratio of 13:1 vs su-30mkk
 

petty officer1

Junior Member
Also, there is an interesting thread going here
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that claims J-10 achieved a kill ratio of 13:1 vs su-30mkk

13:1 ?! I don't think so... how many targets j-10 can lock on the same time. include ground targets. IF the 13:1 is true, J-10 must have a amazing radar and target acquation system, almost near F-22. As China's current ability J-10 is a great achivement, but 13:1 vs su-30mkk just seems like a wet dream.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
13:1 ?! I don't think so... how many targets j-10 can lock on the same time. include ground targets. IF the 13:1 is true, J-10 must have a amazing radar and target acquation system, almost near F-22. As China's current ability J-10 is a great achivement, but 13:1 vs su-30mkk just seems like a wet dream.
it doesn't need to score 13 hits on one go. It can do so in multiple simulated exercises involving multiple J-10s vs multiple su-30mkks. F-22 had like a 200+:2 kill ratio in USAF's most recent major wargame I think.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Exept that Flankers belongs to the fourth generation. The third generation (Phantom generation) is represented in PLAAF trough J8II...

So unless the chinese "third" generation actually means the fourth generation, these planes reportetly "intercepted" weren't Flankers...

The PLA considers "generation" based on the planes they make. Thus J-5/6 means first generation, J-7 and J-8II second generation.

Besides the other characters used to describe fighters are also the same ones used to describe Sukhois in particular.
 

coolieno99

Junior Member
13:1 ?! I don't think so... how many targets j-10 can lock on the same time. include ground targets. IF the 13:1 is true, J-10 must have a amazing radar and target acquation system, almost near F-22. As China's current ability J-10 is a great achivement, but 13:1 vs su-30mkk just seems like a wet dream.
It's very possible that particular J-10 may be used as an engineering test model equipped with an AESA radar. That would give the J-10 an huge advantage over the Su-30MKK.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Don 't think AESA is involved. Just multiple exercises across a wide range of conditions and scenarios like tphuang said.

The ratio sounds incredible though. That beats the suspiciously biased simulations where the Typhoon scored 4.5 against Su-30s and the Rafales a 1:1. I don't believe Shenyang AC would agree to that either. Interesting to see how the J-11B would go against the J-10. Such tests can make or break the J-11B project.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top