New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) in China

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
My overall view is that the discussion about Chinese car companies and EVs are going to only get more geopolitical in nature over time due to real world developments and geopolitical priorities, and it's better to openly acknowledge them than to dismiss them.

I think it isn't productive if members get angry and pissed over political hostilities and resulting in non-productive exchanges over multiple pages, but it is also not a good idea to pretend that Chinese car company expansion and investments in western nations is just business as usual.

Like, from where I'm sitting I fully agree that for BYD and other Chinese companies of course they want to invest in, cooperate with and pursue expansion in western markets... but I also am aware that it is possible within half a year that western governments may just declare by fiat that all of their cars are banned from being sold and their investments to be seized, simply based on political winds, even if they know that China would retaliate against western car companies operating in China.
I would actually entirely welcome that development. A situation where Chinese automakers get banned in Europe and vice versa would be major cause of celebration. overnight, Western automakers are admitting they cannot win, which would boost the Chinese automotive brands. More importantly, Chinese automakers get the whole domestic market with no foreign competition.
If the result of BYD building a factory in Europe is having to sell that factory at below market rate, but then able to take over VW plants in China, that would be a major win.

If people want to make the argument that BYD building a factory in a certain country is bad idea. That's fine. Give conditions of your assumptions, calculate the risks and rewards. That's what a business like BYD has to do. just saying, Italy left BRI, so all Chinese investment will fail in Italy (or any European country that's not Hungary). Well, that's not a legitimate argument.

What are the European laws? What could they do against BYD? What do they have to lose? How much is BYD spending on its European business every year that's fixed cost? How much would factory cost? What are plausible negative scenarios?
As for BYD's factory in California, I wouldn't really say that's BYD being very good at navigating geopolitics so much as no one has really noticed them there yet.
That's because you haven't looked into it as much as I have.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I would actually entirely welcome that development. A situation where Chinese automakers get banned in Europe and vice versa would be major cause of celebration. overnight, Western automakers are admitting they cannot win, which would boost the Chinese automotive brands. More importantly, Chinese automakers get the whole domestic market with no foreign competition.
If the result of BYD building a factory in Europe is having to sell that factory at below market rate, but then able to take over VW plants in China, that would be a major win.

If people want to make the argument that BYD building a factory in a certain country is bad idea. That's fine. Give conditions of your assumptions, calculate the risks and rewards. That's what a business like BYD has to do. just saying, Italy left BRI, so all Chinese investment will fail in Italy (or any European country that's not Hungary). Well, that's not a legitimate argument.

What are the European laws? What could they do against BYD? What do they have to lose? How much is BYD spending on its European business every year that's fixed cost? How much would factory cost? What are plausible negative scenarios?

I want to emphasize on the bolded part -- because I think that is actually exactly what other people here are saying.
I.e.: that there is a risk, that all Chinese investment in XYZ western nations in sensitive industries, face the danger of being setup to fail or be seized in time.

I agree that it is a bit of an extreme argument, but the best way for this thread to approach that argument IMO is just to acknowledge it as a possibility and a risk (albeit an unlikely one in the short term future).
Calling it paranoid or overly emotional imo is not helpful from the perspective of enabling the thread to continue.


The underlying skepticism towards legal protections in western nations and the overall belief that western nations will seek to actively undermine or seize Chinese "higher tech" industries, is one that is not unfounded, and at minimum should be acknowledged.



That's because you haven't looked into it as much as I have.

Sure, you're probably right.
But it is also undeniable that BYD's current US efforts have received next to no political or media scrutiny.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
If the result of BYD building a factory in Europe is having to sell that factory at below market rate, but then able to take over VW plants in China, that would be a major win.
No it's not. VW plants in China are joint-ventures, BYD will not get them nor it wants to anyways since majority of those plants are tooled for ICE cars
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
What are the European laws? What could they do against BYD? What do they have to lose? How much is BYD spending on its European business every year that's fixed cost? How much would factory cost? What are plausible negative scenarios?
What laws let US/European countries banned/ripped out Huawei/ZTE gears? What laws did Canadian government use to force fire sales by Chinese investors? All they have to do is to yell "NATIONAL SECURITY!" and Chinese companies' investments are gone. Rule of law is a freaking joke in the West right now.

Look, you kept saying BYD and others can look after their own interests. Unfortunately Chinese companies have a history of NOT having proper risk management practices. Just look at how much Chinese companies invested in Indian knowing full well how Indian government had mistreated foreign firms (Vodafone, Amazon, Walmart, etc).
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Look, you kept saying BYD and others can look after their own interests. Unfortunately Chinese companies have a history of NOT having proper risk management practices. Just look at how much Chinese companies invested in Indian knowing full well how Indian government had mistreated foreign firms (Vodafone, Amazon, Walmart, etc).

Disagree, it's not that they do not have proper risk management, it is that private firms have a higher appetite for risk.

I believe it's because the domestic market is always facing heavy competition from SOEs. SOEs tend to be pretty conservative, so it is up to the private businesses to take the risks and reap the rewards when they pay off.

Even with the Indian government's best efforts, Chinese handset makers are still number 1 in their market. Clearly they are still making money despite the fines and arrests, otherwise they would pack up shop just like all those other companies did.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I want to emphasize on the bolded part -- because I think that is actually exactly what other people here are saying.
I.e.: that there is a risk, that all Chinese investment in XYZ western nations in sensitive industries, face the danger of being setup to fail or be seized in time.

I agree that it is a bit of an extreme argument, but the best way for this thread to approach that argument IMO is just to acknowledge it as a possibility and a risk (albeit an unlikely one in the short term future).
Calling it paranoid or overly emotional imo is not helpful from the perspective of enabling the thread to continue.


The underlying skepticism towards legal protections in western nations and the overall belief that western nations will seek to actively undermine or seize Chinese "higher tech" industries, is one that is not unfounded, and at minimum should be acknowledged.
I don't think we are going to agree here

No it's not. VW plants in China are joint-ventures, BYD will not get them nor it wants to anyways since majority of those plants are tooled for ICE cars
Let's say BYD doesn't get those plants. Now, the Germans/Americans are out of the China market. BYD loses 1 plant and maybe a few hundred stores in Europe. Let's say it sell those at 20% discount.
On the other side. Thousands of VW/BBA/Tesla stores in China are suddenly out of work, same with their sales staff. BYD will have its picking of store locations & sales staff that it can snap up really cheaply. Since those foreign JV partners are suddenly left with factories and no work, now there is a healthy selection of available workers with industry experience you can snap up. The land/facility of those old factories are available for really cheap. BYD can quickly snap them up and put the latest tools in them and voila.
If you have seen how quickly BYD has been able to build new factories and tool them, you would think this is not a problem at all.
And now, it gets 30-40% of a huge domestic market, because it's the only one that can scale up really quickly in China.

I don't see how this is not a win

Of course, if Chinese govt is too afraid to retaliate, then we got a problem. But you would think they have to in this scenario.

What laws let US/European countries banned/ripped out Huawei/ZTE gears? What laws did Canadian government use to force fire sales by Chinese investors? All they have to do is to yell "NATIONAL SECURITY!" and Chinese companies' investments are gone. Rule of law is a freaking joke in the West right now.
Right, so let's say BYD build a plant in a control "controlled" by America and they are told BYD cars can no longer be sold here. What is their investment in that case? Do they need to pay back owners that bought BYD cars? If not, then why does it matter EU countries banned or ripped out HW gears?

Did Huawei get their factory confiscated? for some reason after all these things, Huawei is still going ahead with its factory in France
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Look, you kept saying BYD and others can look after their own interests. Unfortunately Chinese companies have a history of NOT having proper risk management practices. Just look at how much Chinese companies invested in Indian knowing full well how Indian government had mistreated foreign firms (Vodafone, Amazon, Walmart, etc).
of course, India always comes back to this discussion. I have no issue with Chinese companies being involved in India. It's their money. If they thought it was prudent to go into India and lost money in the process. They should be allowed to do so.

Here is the part that always gets to me. People get upset when the topic of BYD investing in certain country comes up. But do not get similarly upset when it enters the country.

Here is a question. How many stores have they opened up in these markets. How much money does it cost to run these stores every year and operate the local dealer network?

How much annual expense & depreciation do you get from a new plant?

Do you think BYD sinks more money per year in a 150k/year car factory vs having an 1000 store dealership network? Why does the former get people upset, but the latter does not?

For me, i think it would be bad if BYD has to sell a factory at 80% discount in 3 years. But I think it would be even worse if it builds a huge network of dealers and experience center (many in really prime locations) over 3 years and then isn't able to sell any EVs, because tariffs raised cost too much. There is a lot of cost involved when you enter a new market.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
I`ve just seen NEVs sales stats for February, what a disastrous free fall, even lower than February last year.
As i said many times, this format of CNY is deadly for the economy, as GDP grows, inpact is getting harder and harder, causing tremendous losses in money, time...

It is a cultural thing.

After all, the way I understand it, that retail sales in the United States, most of it occurs during the two months leading into Christmas, then it drops off like a rock falling off a cliff.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


edit, the car sales kind of follow a same general pattern of seasonality and when the new models come out for the year
 
Last edited:

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
I want to emphasize on the bolded part -- because I think that is actually exactly what other people here are saying.
I.e.: that there is a risk, that all Chinese investment in XYZ western nations in sensitive industries, face the danger of being setup to fail or be seized in time.

I agree that it is a bit of an extreme argument, but the best way for this thread to approach that argument IMO is just to acknowledge it as a possibility and a risk (albeit an unlikely one in the short term future).
Calling it paranoid or overly emotional imo is not helpful from the perspective of enabling the thread to continue.


The underlying skepticism towards legal protections in western nations and the overall belief that western nations will seek to actively undermine or seize Chinese "higher tech" industries, is one that is not unfounded, and at minimum should be acknowledged.





Sure, you're probably right.
But it is also undeniable that BYD's current US efforts have received next to no political or media scrutiny.


That is the whole point of business.

Risks have to be taken.

That is why the Chinese excel at business. For two reasons.

One, we are economic animals, and cheap too.
Two, we love to gamble, aka, take risks.

They got the cash, they feel lucky.

We get to sit back and watch.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
anyways, more EV news


Li Auto has now launched MEGA at 559.8K RMB


Li Auto L7/L8/L9 2024 version has come out
Lol, Dolby Atmos speakers, for whatever reason seems to be a Lux selling point in China.
Mercedes was the first to have the automotive Atmos license, but all others are Chinese-origin (except Lucid)
Li, XPeng, Nio, AION, Geely group (Polestar, Volvo, Lotus)
 
Top