I don't feel the need to stay away from this thread on the matter of differences of opinions, thank you very much.
The problem isn't that you have difference opinion, but that you are making your point without a full understanding of the industry as a whole.
They didn't confiscate Huawei, but they just used different tools to squeeze it out of the market wherever they could with their influence despite the fact Huawei is the leader in its industry. It all started in the same way, citing 'national security'. The mechanics and details would be different, of course, as the industries are different. China can retaliate but that didn't stop them from making dumb decisions before or twisting around their 'legal systems', which Huawei too had approached in many countries, to no avail.
Secondly, stop putting words into my post and amplifying them, I never said America cannot be stopped and China is a weak little country I'm here for good discourse, and this is a forum of discussion, it's okay to not agree 100% on everything.
In the end, their consumers will lose and their players will remain inefficient, but they will still pursue the course.
If they didn't confiscate Huawei, then they won't confiscate BYD. In fact, Huawei continues to have a huge presence in Europe. At worst, BYD will have to sell their factory. But if they do this, all the German companies will have to do it in China also. That would be a great win for BYD.
BYD should not stop in its process of growing in European market, because it is the second largest EV market. It is getting around possible tariffs by building factories locally.
I think the discussion around Chinese car/EV companies and their efforts abroad cannot be separated from geopolitics.
There is a balance between companies like BYD choosing to expand their overseas presence in the west, and the risk of having investments be compromised through hostile political forces.
And yes, hostile actions towards Chinese car companies can always be responded to with reciprocal Chinese government retaliation to western car companies, but the question is not about whether the Chinese government is powerless or not, but rather the question is whether Chinese car companies are being sufficiently careful so as to minimize the opportunity/cost of pursuing investments in potentially hostile western nations that end up being a poor use of present resources that are better directed elsewhere, in the event of geopolitical blowback.
If BYD does pursue a investment in Italy to manufacture cars, I think it is not an exaggeration to acknowledge the geopolitical hostility that Italy has demonstrated and Italy's vulnerability to geopolitical influence from the US, and that legal protections only exist in so much that a host government (or influencing government) perceives it to be in their interest.
The question then becomes one of whether it was worth BYD's time to pursue an investment into Italy (or XYZ other country) to begin with, and how well their geopolitical risk assessment jives with their loss prevention.
At minimum, I think if we are talking about the idea of BYD setting up shop in Italy, the first and prominent question that BYD should be asking, is "what's the geopolitical risk". Neither they, nor we as observers have the benefit of entertaining Chinese car companies expanding/investing in western nations as if it is just business as usual, instead, having a constant vigilance and paranoia about whether they may be a victim of political hostility is an unfortunate necessity.
Well, I think when you mix in geopolitics, then discussions get overly emotional. BYD mentioning Italy got blowback here because they left BRI. Now if you mention another country like Spain, Greece or Portugal, it has similar risk factor due to their status as NATO members.
Now if you believe that they shouldn't set up factory in Europe, that's a different discussion. Then, you have risk of getting major tariffs and not selling your EVs. Which is a problem after investing in hundreds to thousands of stores + dealership network. The yearly cost of paying these stores are not any less than depreciation/interest/operating cost of a factory.
Then, if your answer is they shouldn't sell cars in any Western countries, then you are missing out on half of world's auto market. All markets where BYD can sell their EVs at much higher prices.
There is risks in every investment. It's silly to think that BYD is not doing their own geopolitical calculations in these decisions. Stella Li recently said BYD has no plan to enter American PV market. And I think that's the right move. BYD has a politically saavy group of people running. They are doing all they can to reduce geopolitical risks.
Remember, BYD has a huge factory in Lancaster California and is probably the largest supplier of electric commercial vehicles in America. In fact, my city buys from them. And they've operated here for a long time. They are extremely good at navigating these things