Modern Carrier Battle Group..Strategies and Tactics

delft

Brigadier
Uhmmm, lemme see now.

If these old eyes don't deceive me, that looks like a ski-jump carrier.

But does the Italian Navy operate aircraft that can actually use the ski-jump?

I suspect not.

And if they don't, why have it on the carrier?

Furthermore any prospects of getting something in the future are rather dim given Italy's economic problems.

Just my 2 cents.
MM acquired AV-8B's in the 1990's and the US hopes it will buy F-35B's ( the plan was 22, but it has already been reduced to 15 ) but that seems to me to be financially highly irresponsible.
 

Lezt

Junior Member
Uhmmm, lemme see now.

If these old eyes don't deceive me, that looks like a ski-jump carrier.

But does the Italian Navy operate aircraft that can actually use the ski-jump?

I suspect not.

And if they don't, why have it on the carrier?

Furthermore any prospects of getting something in the future are rather dim given Italy's economic problems.

Just my 2 cents.

They are flushed deck. for harriers II
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
But does the Italian Navy operate aircraft that can actually use the ski-jump?

I suspect not.
Dusky, the Italians have two carriers, and they have operated Harriers since the late 1980s. They currently have 15 Harriers.

Their intent is to go to the F-35B on the carriers, and they will do so. They confirmed orders in 2013 for 60 F-35A and 30 F-35B (see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). The F-35Bs will be for the carriers.

Now, there were
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that the Italians may reduce this number...but most view those as threats to get better concessions out of Lockheed Martin and we will have to just wait and see what happens.

As it is, the Italians are a strong member country in the JSF partnership and will actually have a manufacturing and maintenance plant in Italy to service other European countries, which will bring in money to Italy. If they drop their orders too low, they will lose that opportunity.

Here are their carriers showing the aircraft:

First, the Cavour, 550, with nine Harriers aboard:


cavour-01.jpg


Then the Garibaldi, 551, with seven Harriers aboard:


garibaldi1.jpg


They also operate AW-101 helos for AEW, Specifically the 112-AEW model, of which they have four.

With their Horizon class escorts and the FREMM class FFGs, they also have a very credible escort force for these carriers.

BTW, if you ever have any questions about modern aircraft carriers or large Amphibious Assault Ships, just check my World-wide Aircraft Carriers page:


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


...or for the principle escorts of these carriers, my AEGIS and AEGIS-like Vessels of the World page:


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 
Last edited:

duskylim

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Dusky, the Italians have two carriers, and they have operated Harriers since the late 1980s. They currently have 15 Harriers.

Their intent is to go to the F-35B on the carriers, and they will do so. They confirmed orders in 2013 for 60 F-35A and 30 F-35B (see
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). The F-35Bs will be for the carriers.

Now, there were
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that the Italians may reduce this number...but most view those as threats to get better concessions out of Lockheed Martin and we will have to just wait and see what happens.

As it is, the Italians are a strong member country in the JSF partnership and will actually have a manufacturing and maintenance plant in Italy to service other European countries, which will bring in money to Italy. If they drop their orders too low, they will lose that opportunity.

Here are their carriers showing the aircraft:

First, the Cavour, 550, with nine Harriers aboard:

Then the Garibaldi, 551, with seven Harriers aboard:

They also operate AW-101 helos for AEW, Specifically the 112-AEW model, of which they have four.

With their Horizon class escorts and the FREMM class FFGs, they also have a very credible escort force for these carriers.

BTW, if you ever have any questions about modern aircraft carriers or large Amphibious Assault Ships, just check my World-wide Aircraft Carriers page:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


...or for the principle escorts of these carriers, my AEGIS and AEGIS-like Vessels of the World page:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Oh! Okay, I am properly humbled.

Last I knew G. Garibaldi operated only helicopters.

I remember seeing pictures of her operating with the Spanish Navy's Principe de Asturias.

There were Harriers on the Asturias, but none on the Garibaldi.

Well, that's why we have these forums, ya live and learn.

And the Italians are re-cycling all the old battleship names, both the Conti de Cavour and Giuseppe Garibaldi were ships of the line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Last I knew G. Garibaldi operated only helicopters.

I remember seeing pictures of her operating with the Spanish Navy's Principe de Asturias.

There were Harriers on the Asturias, but none on the Garibaldi.

Well, that's why we have these forums, ya live and learn.
No problemo, Dusky.

Right now, there are only three nations in the world that have more than one fixed-wing aircraft carrier.

- United States has ten Nimitz class and the one Ford, one America and eight Wasp. or twenty.
- Italy has two with the Cavour and Garibaldi.
- India has twothe Vikrmaditya and the Viraat.

(Note: I include the America and Wasp class with the US because they in fact regularly operate fixed wing aircraft off of their large decks. Harriers for now, but soon to be F-35B Joint Strike Fighters)

India is going to end up with three with their new Vikrant, to be followed by the Vishal, by which time the Viraat will be decommissioned and they will fulfill their goal for three active carriers.

The UK will join the group with the Queen Elizabeth and the Prince of Wales, and of course, we all expect the Chinese to join that group.

Then, with China, like the Indians, the PLAN will move on to three. But unlike the Indians, it is expected that the Chinese will build as many as five.

So when all is said and done, the nations who plan at this point to oeprate more than one fixed wing aircraft carrier will end up being:

- United States with 20
- China with 5
- India with 3
- United Kingdom with 2
- Italy with 2

Then there are several of countries who operate one:

- France
- Russia
- Brazil
- Thailand
- Spain

Now, Japan may end up with two or more. The Izumo Class (one built the other building) may in fact one day carry the J-35B aircraft. If they do, then Japan will have at least two.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Remember two months ago it was reported that Iran built a mock up carrier? Well it appears they plan on sinking the fake CVN during a war game. Question is, is this just a PR move or do the Iranians really think they can learn anything by sinking this ship?.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


By ASSOCIATED PRESS | 4/27/14 8:36 AM EDT
TEHRAN, Iran — An Iranian newspaper is reporting that the country’s military plans to target a mock-up American aircraft carrier during upcoming war games.

The Sunday report by independent Haft-e Sobh daily quotes Adm. Ali Fadavi, navy chief of the powerful Revolutionary Guards as saying Iranian forces should “target the carrier in the trainings, after it is completed.”

"Adm. Fadavi said: “We should learn about weaknesses and strengths of our enemy.”

Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This is the first reaction by Iranian officials to a March report that said Iran is building a simple replica of the USS Nimitz in a shipyard in the southern port of Bandar Abbas. Iranian officials did not comment then but state TV said it would be used in a movie.

Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iran's fake CVN..March 2014

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Of course since the "Carrier" is defense less lacking the helicopters and escorts that would surround her she's not going to give much of a fight.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: How Do You Sink A Carrier?

A carrier is a just an airbase. You would attack a carrier at sea as if it was an airbase on land. Find it, overwhelm the defense in numbers, and bomb the remains.
So easily said...but extremely difficult to do.

Today's US Navy CSGs present a very difficult air defense, electronic warfare, anti-submarine labrynth that is both hard to find and difficult to overwhelm.

The former Soviet Union was prepared to commit to a single US carrier strike group, regiments of long range attack aircraft, expecting to lose a large percentage of them to take one on. Regiments.

That's the level of commitment an OPFOR s going to have to make...without my guarantee of success.
 
Last edited:

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) has generated a tremendous amount of interest over the past five years. If it works, it poses a very serious threat to U.S. Navy (USN) carriers, as well as to the other advanced warships of the USN, of the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force, and others.

An anti-ship ballistic missile is more than just a missile; it requires a broad, sophisticated support system. Unlike a missile launched at static targets, a carrier-killing ASBM requires terminal guidance, as it must revise its flight path after reentering the atmosphere. From launch to strike, the flight of an ASBM can take fifteen or so minutes, at which time the carrier in question will have more than likely moved its position on the open ocean. The missile thus needs to be adjusted remotely or needs to have the capacity to identify the carrier on its own. Both of these processes depend on the operation of a sophisticated set of sensors, as well as a communication system capable of integrating these sensors and transmitting information to shooters. As
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“the successful achievement of high-quality, real-time satellite imagery and target-locating data and fusion as well as reliable indigenous satellite navigation and positioning would facilitate holding enemy vessels at risk via devastating multi-axis strikes .”


The USN is very concerned about the DF-21D, which is one reason it’s working so hard on
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(ABM) technology.

The USN is also working on other countermeasures, including strikes on DF-21 launch sites at the onset of war (potentially delivered from nuclear cruise missile submarines (SSGNs), and electronic warfare.


This is why it’s so important to emphasize the importance of the ancillary ISR and communication system that make the DF-21D possible. The US doesn’t need to destroy ever launcher, or shoot down every missile in flight. Both of those represent important capabilities, but the key task is to disrupt the system that supports the missile, making it hard for China to identify, target, and strike US carrier groups.


No one knows what would happen if the Second Artillery launched a salvo of DF-21Ds at a US carrier battle group. Some percentage (depending on reliability) would invariably go astray without US help. US escorts would shoot down some percentage with ship-board ABM systems. Electronic disruption would cause some to plunge harmlessly into the ocean. And finally, some might hit a carrier, or hit carrier escorts. A successful hit will almost certainly result in at least a “mission kill,” disabling a US carrier for the remainder of the conflict.

Anti-Access System of System

It bears emphasis that Chinese carrier-killing capabilities constitute a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
not dependent upon any particular weapon. The rest of China’s system of systems includes nuclear and conventional submarines, medium and long range strike aircraft, surface warships, and land-based cruise missile installations. These platforms can launch a wide array of weapons, most importantly China’s vast
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.


In sufficient numbers, all of these can threaten to kill a carrier. In a shooting war we could expect China to use all of these systems, or to graduate their use depending on political and military developments. Some of these are more easily countered than others, while some pose greater costs to the Chinese. For example, any surface ship launching a cruise missile at a USN carrier group can likely expect quick destruction. Similarly, both aircraft and submarines would face a high rate of attrition while making attacks on US ships and installations.

ASBMs have some obvious advantages over these other systems. Operating from land bases, the DF-21D can strike carrier groups at greater range (1000+ miles) than any cruise missile. US air defense systems were designed to defend against Soviet cruise missile attacks, but a ballistic missile attack is a different prospect entirely. While the US can strike land bases, China can defend these targets more heavily through active and passive measures that it can protect relatively fragile ships and aircraft.
 
Top