Modern Carrier Battle Group..Strategies and Tactics

TerraN_EmpirE said:

Jura... I was talking about Ground strikes not naval missions. Using the F35 and UAV's sensors to guide precision long range weapons like Tomahawk and future rail guns.

Click to expand...

TerraN_EmpirE said:

Jura... I was talking about Ground strikes not naval missions. Using the F35 and UAV's sensors to guide precision long range weapons like Tomahawk and future rail guns.

Click to expand...

Jura said:

F35 guiding rail guns, got it
LOL!

Click to expand...

Equation said:

I think what TE meant that the communications and computer systems can help the F-35 pilot guide munitions at a precise location fired from either a rail gun or vertical launch system cruise missiles.

Click to expand...

Jura said:

LOL I guess I know what TE meant, but that's not the point, the point is I originally attempted to realistically discuss NIFCA and F-35, so I then took here what started in
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread
the last one there was
#4635 TerraN_EmpirE, Yesterday at 12:17 AM

and here I just quit while fed up ... you know, when talking to F-35 proponents who give this "projected" capabilities connected to now pretty much nonexistent "options", I feel as if I was in
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/star-wars-sc-fi-talk.t5702/
and personally I don't like Sci-Fi (I like History though)

Click to expand...

TerraN_EmpirE said:

Well realistically speaking NIFCA is not fielded neither is F35, discussing their aim means speaking from the mission Objective perspective IE Not where it is, not what was but what is planned. Of Course F35 opponents like to stick there fingers in there ears and go LALALALALALALA! when it comes to developmental because they think it has to be looked at from the now when They can let loose on F35 as a Turkey. and historically have done the same for F22 and V22.

Click to expand...