Modern Carrier Battle Group..Strategies and Tactics

escobar

Brigadier
Research on terminal guidance precision of tactical ballistic missile attacking aircraft carrier

001047w93ujx998gkhnhdyjpgthumb_zpscc36db5f.jpg

001053mhhsb55pwth28pwtjpgthumb_zpse58f195d.jpg

001058ftdo1pxunozrqtunjpgthumb_zpsbf6375e0.jpg

001103pk88z5wwblrkt5lijpgthumb_zpse69552b7.jpg
 

escobar

Brigadier
Wow i am flabbergasted . Excellent find I have been telling people that China has studied this ASBM to death and Now we have glimpse of early theoretical study(Prelim engineering) of this beast. But I still see people in denial and poo poo the idea of ASBM. They definitely study every aspect of ASBM . That must be done in 80's Now we are in IOC phase and every year they will improve the system as we recently witness the UAV brigade deployment with Second artillery

I think it's 2006-2008 not in the 80's
 

advill

Junior Member
Appears to be impressive Chinese academic papers. However, have these been actually tested on the 'ground'? If so, results pl?. In MBA evening classes for working business executives, we stress that whatever biz theories/calculations written/presented will only be relevant if successful in practical/actual implementations. No doubt we need the 'wise' theorists, however actual/proven tests confirm whether they are or are not 'pies in the skies'.



Analysis on the attack of moving mass center surface-to-surface missile

001521c0y75c4z7a45f4afjpgthumb_zps28e7862d.jpg

001525qnsz1vfxx1z3hh00jpgthumb_zps2581ef0c.jpg

001531vubdxgttaeb3iamtjpgthumb_zps459b0d70.jpg
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Appears to be impressive Chinese academic papers. However, have these been actually tested on the 'ground'? If so, results pl?. In MBA evening classes for working business executives, we stress that whatever biz theories/calculations written/presented will only be relevant if successful in practical/actual implementations. No doubt we need the 'wise' theorists, however actual/proven tests confirm whether they are or are not 'pies in the skies'.

I have no doubt that they have been tested. You don't need to test the full fledged system too revealing . You can test component by component like the seeker, the guidance and control etc

You can disguise the missile seeker by mounting it on small missile and use small ship as target with radar reflector.

China do have a small missile that can target slow moving ship It was operational and sell to Pakistan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

CM-400AKG
This supersonic standoff missile was first on display at the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow as part of FC-1/JF-17's "complete" weapon package. Unlike most modern ASMs flying at the low altitude, the missile flies a rare high ballistic trajectory, powered by a solid rocket motor. It appears that CM-400AKG may have evolved from the earlier SY-400 SRBM. Therefore the effectiveness of such attack profile is still unknown. Some specifications: weight 900kg, max range 240km, max speed Mach 5.5 (at diving stage?). It has INS during the mid-course and utilizes active radar/passive radar/IIR seeker with target-recognition capabilities at the terminal stage, which may improve its accuracy. The missile is claimed to be capable of terminal maneuver in some degree to avoid interception by SAM. CM-400AKG is speculated to have been designed to attack fixed or "slow moving", high value ground targets. It has yet to be confirmed that CM-400AGK is in service with PAF's JF-17.

Those papers has been observed by western analyst like Mark Stokes and Ian Easton in 90's by the time new millennium come the paper have moved from generality like this paper to more concrete nut and bolt of how to design the components

This is an excellent primer on ASBM
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Junior Member
I have no doubt that they have been tested. You don't need to test the full fledged system too revealing . You can test component by component like the seeker, the guidance and control etc

You can disguise the missile seeker by mounting it on small missile and use small ship as target with radar reflector.

China do have a small missile that can target slow moving ship It was operational and sell to Pakistan

Those papers has been observed by western analyst like Mark Stokes and Ian Easton in 90's by the time new millennium come the paper have moved from generality like this paper to more concrete nut and bolt of how to design the components

This is an excellent primer on ASBM
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

as an engineer, i can guranntee you that you need to integrate all the components together for testing.
also paper is paper its theoretical studys, its whole another issue to make it work. this only prove theory of concept but not prove work of system/design.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
as an engineer, i can guranntee you that you need to integrate all the components together for testing.
also paper is paper its theoretical studys, its whole another issue to make it work. this only prove theory of concept but not prove work of system/design.

We know that the people who work on the Anti Ballistic Missile system are the same people working on the ASBM and I repeat again if they can hit missile flying at 6000 mile/hour Aircraft carrier with speed of 30 knot is just stationary to me Yup child play

China’s anti-missile test successful: govt
Global Times | 2013-1-29 1:18:01
By Xu Tianran
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China's second ground-based mid-course missile interceptor successfully completed an anti-missile test within Chinese territory on Sunday, hours after the US conducted a test flight of its own missile interceptor.

There were no details available on China's test except for the official announcement that "the test has reached the preset goal" and is "defensive in nature."

It was the second time that China announced such an anti-missile test. A similar test was successfully conducted on January 11, 2010.

Ground-based mid-course anti-missile tests, which involve highly complicated technology in detecting, tracking and destroying a ballistic missile flying in space, have only been attempted by China and the US.

The success of the test, together with a series of other military equipment achievements including China's first aircraft carrier and the maiden flight of the Y-20 large transport aircraft on Saturday, has demonstrated the country's fast-growing ability to defend its own national security and deter any possible threats, the Xinhua News Agency commented Monday.

A ballistic missile's mid-course phase begins after its engines burn out and the warhead begins coasting in space. After mid-course, the warhead of long-range and intercontinental ballistic missiles will re-enter the atmosphere with a velocity of about 20 times the speed of sound, making it very difficult to intercept with current terminal-phase interception systems, according to Lan Yun, a military observer and editor with Modern Ships magazine.

Shao Yongling, a senior colonel from the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Second Artillery Command College, told people.com.cn that China's ground-based mid-course interception test was aimed at intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles, and the test's technical requirements were much higher than that of short- to medium-range missile defense systems.
 
Last edited:
Top