Interesting all the entrepreneurs they talked to went by their English names. I think we know the type of people we’re dealing with here…
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
This lady is "connected" in the tech scene. The Chinese still have a complex
Sore losers who suffered in Chinese districts for being Sinophobic.
Using intelligence leaks to affect domestic politics is a tried and true strategy by the CIA to keep their vassals in line. Worked for Australia and now they're doing it here.
Trudeau's retarded for giving in. What politician throws away their supporters to give in to demands of their political enemies?
"Okay ill throw out the Chinese consular"
"Okay ill agree to a review"
"Okay ill fire the reviewer"
"Okay ill let you fuck my wife, just let me watch"
Trudeau's so retarded that the only way he can create the condition to talk to president Xi is to smash his head on the wall a a few dozen times to gain some IQ points.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Well, it looks like we moved past the civilized line now, and I have no choice but to respond in this thread.
Secondly, I never changed the goal posts. I always stuck to this:
pissing or purposely disturbing an average person's grave is low and dehumanizing regardless of their motive. Reasons like atrocities aren't enough since everybody has commited them before.
Shifting the goal posts is changing the rules of a competition to suite myself, not changing settings or examples that I didn't even bring up minus the Vietnam one.
I also would like to add that unless you are a "do as I say, not as I do" type of person, from a Chinese standpoint, under your own standard, you should be willing to be ok with Vietnamese and South Koreans pissing on Chinese remains for the 1979 invasion and Korean War respectively. Justice is in the eyes of the beholder.
Speaking of fallacies, you commited the appeal to emotion fallacy numerous times by invoking atrocities that involve the Chinese to gain sympathy rather than directly refuting why pissing on someone's grave is bad.
Given your repeated appeal to emotion fallacies, I would be happy to take this beef to a private chat with your response. Or we can both accept that we both agree to disagree in a vehement manner. I don't care what you choose, but I have no interest in polluting this thread with a debate like that of pmc and manqiangrexue.
Firstly, the PVA stood for the People's Volunteer Army, which is the precursor to the PLA of China. The Vietnamese counterpart is the PAVN.
Secondly, I never changed the goal posts. I always stuck to this:
pissing or purposely disturbing an average person's grave is low and dehumanizing regardless of their motive. Reasons like atrocities aren't enough since everybody has commited them before.
Shifting the goal posts is changing the rules of a competition to suite myself, not changing settings or examples that I didn't even bring up minus the Vietnam one.
I also would like to add that unless you are a "do as I say, not as I do" type of person, from a Chinese standpoint, under your own standard, you should be willing to be ok with Vietnamese and South Koreans pissing on Chinese remains for the 1979 invasion and Korean War respectively. Justice is in the eyes of the beholder.
Speaking of fallacies, you commited the appeal to emotion fallacy numerous times by invoking atrocities that involve the Chinese to gain sympathy rather than directly refuting why pissing on someone's grave is bad.
Already mentioned my reasoning above.
Appeal to emotion fallacy again. Also a corpse and his or her grave isn't the same as an all-encomposing monument. Apples and oranges fallacy as well.
Because it is low and b*tch move. Go beat up and insult the present British who proudly hold onto their loot and defend their thievery. But beating up the dead is equivalent to attacking the helpless: neither can defend themselves.
Cool. Then you should be ok with the desecration of anyones's remains if they seek justice.
That's a strawman fallacy right there. Never did I say that I forgave them. I just said that it was a form of trash behavior. Plus are we really at war? Did China declare war on the UK? Are you on the battlefield shedding blood and tears to kill a British soldier or are you just talking trash on the Internet like many keyboard warriors do? Or are you a time travelling Chinese soldier from the Opium Wars or Malaya guerilla from the Malaysian "emergency"? If none of the above, then we are at peacetime and you are not a participant in the war. And by my logic, you lack the qualification to ignore peacetime etiquette,
Given your repeated appeal to emotion fallacies, I would be happy to take this beef to a private chat with your response. Or we can both accept that we both agree to disagree in a vehement manner. I don't care what you choose, but I have no interest in polluting this thread with a debate like that of pmc and manqiangrexue.
A more significant lesson here is this lack of proper diligence on their "Uighur persecution" reporting confirms Amnesty International's bias against China.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
UK wanted to get rid of migrant workers because "they were taking people's jobs". So now they have no one to pick crops or drive transport vehicles. Food rotted in the fields, and products did not reach supermarket shelves due to lack of transport. UK citizens are not taking those jobs en masse because of low wages. As a result UK farmers have been reducing planted area (why waste money planting produce you cannot pick later). In addition, extra red tape in importation of produce due to Brexit means the UK cannot import food on time either.
Attachments
-
signal-2023-05-31-20-37-16-772.jpg