Miscellaneous News

Eventine

Senior Member
Registered Member

A little revolt from the MIC media recently lol. Couldn't be a more obvious coordinated pressure campaign to extort a bit more pay from their MIC funders. This is what presstitutes going on strike looks like. They'll get their wish and then it's back to the regularly scheduled propaganda soon enough.
More likely internal consensus manufacturing to make way for a Democratic break from the Republican strategy of China bashing all day long in the up coming election.

The problem with the Democrats doing exactly what the Republicans do is that they can never "out hate" the Republicans. The latter will always have an advantage in selling the China threat to their base. The Democrats have no hope of matching the Republicans in appearing to be more China hating. So it isn't an effective election strategy.

So they're testing the water on whether they can sell a different narrative to the American public - "we are responsible competitors who'll beat the Chinese by being the best version of ourselves." This will play out vastly better to the Democratic base, who love to think they have the moral high ground.

It's all performance, of course. In the end, neither party's policies will be all that different.

But it's very telling that it's the media sources connected to the Democratic establishment that are pushing this story right now.
 

birdlikefood

Junior Member
Registered Member
Many of us in the states have a deeply-engrained sense that only our side is capable of doing anything "good," and that anything "the enemy" does is just a clever ruse, a cynical exploitation, or a propaganda stunt to lower our guard.

We can see this most evidently in our attitude towards BRI. China has been successfully coupling itself to smaller economies, providing infrastructure and capital for lesser-developed nations, and broadly enhancing its global prestige in the process. Instead of acknowledging this fact and coming up with a better alternative for these nations, we decried it as "debt trap diplomacy" and "neocolonialism," making CN out to be an untrustworthy, predatory entity.

Another example is MIC2025, we took it as a "threat to global trade!" and painted it as an aggressive, dishonest attempt to "dominate" the world market, fuel neo-imperialist/expansionist military ambitions, and subvert the US industrial supply chain. Of course, we ignored that such an initiative is the obvious, sensible direction for a developing nation that is integrating itself into high-value-added industry and trade; and forgot that we had done quite literally the exact same thing (if not worse) for most of the cold war.

Much of this zeitgeist is a product of Cold War era cultural Oikophilia, wherein everything Freedom and Liberty and Democracy and Human Rights and blah blah blah was ascribed to the West and considered the ultimate "good" in the world; whereas The Enemy™ was painted as the antithesis to those concepts, and thus always should be seen as the ultimate "bad." When you think about it like that, especially when you consider that the fundamental framework for our "system of morality" is derived from religious iconography of a similar style (God == ultimate "good" & Devil == ultimate "bad" - and any "good" done by the Devil is always actually "bad" no matter how it may look at first), then our aversion towards acknowledging good deeds by The Enemy™ is a little more comprehensible.

In my opinion, CN deserves to be proud of what they've accomplished; so it's incredibly frustrating watching us seethe and whine instead of just trying to do better. We didn't win the Space Race by kneecapping the Soviet space program, we won it by building our own.
Brilliant summary!

In fact, the values that best represent most chinese people have always been written in the most conspicuous place in China.

1678596299477.png

“Long live the People's Republic of China !” and “Long live the great union of the people of the world!”

Its modern version is "The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation" with a strong spirit of nationalism and "A human community with a shared future" with a strong spirit of internationalism.

The core spirit of the People's Republic of China has never changed.
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Here's the senile Peterson's tweet. He should just stick to what he knows best and that's crying.

jordan peterson just RTed fetish porn of some white guys with the matrix filter over it because he thought it was a chinese breeding facility
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
March 11, 2023
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It’s like during the 2019 HK riots where Western propaganda used a bdsm sex dungeon as proof of china torturing dissidents. It actually speaks volumes of the calibre of individuals who join with western imperialism: perennial incels unable to score a real woman and who have a crushing porn addiction.
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
It’s like during the 2019 HK riots where Western propaganda used a bdsm sex dungeon as proof of china torturing dissidents. It actually speaks volumes of the calibre of individuals who join with western imperialism: perennial incels unable to score a real woman and who have a crushing porn addiction.
This thing happened many times. There were photos from a BDSM club in Taiwan which were posted as leaked photos of torture in Uyghur concentration camps. Fetish and BDSM material getting posted as "leaked CCP atrocities" is not a very obscure event. It happens every 1-2 years and we only see ones that get viral. I bet you'd see it happening regularly if you follow enough anti china and falun gong accounts
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US Discusses Fund to Backstop Deposits If More Banks Fail​

  • FDIC, Fed weigh special vehicle after SVB swiftly collapses
  • Regulators are racing to stem the fallout for other banks

Fears Spread​

First Republic’s stock had tumbled 15% on Friday, extending the bank’s slide to 34% for the week. The firm
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in a statement that its liquidity remained strong and that its deposit base was very diversified.

Representatives for San Francisco-based First Republic and the FDIC didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the interactions.


A number of other regional lenders also saw their stock plunge on SVB’s collapse, prompting their own assurances of financial stability.


At the rate this is developing, I would not be surprised if next week we hear a story about how Yellen already called her Chinese counterpart over this phone this weekend.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US Discusses Fund to Backstop Deposits If More Banks Fail​

  • FDIC, Fed weigh special vehicle after SVB swiftly collapses
  • Regulators are racing to stem the fallout for other banks




At the rate this is developing, I would not be surprised if next week we hear a story about how Yellen already called her Chinese counterpart over this phone this weekend.
Xi shouldnt budge, nothing short of a fleet of Boeing 747 delivery of EUV machines to Beijing would do this time around...
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Many of us in the states have a deeply-engrained sense that only our side is capable of doing anything "good," and that anything "the enemy" does is just a clever ruse, a cynical exploitation, or a propaganda stunt to lower our guard.

We can see this most evidently in our attitude towards BRI. China has been successfully coupling itself to smaller economies, providing infrastructure and capital for lesser-developed nations, and broadly enhancing its global prestige in the process. Instead of acknowledging this fact and coming up with a better alternative for these nations, we decried it as "debt trap diplomacy" and "neocolonialism," making CN out to be an untrustworthy, predatory entity.

Another example is MIC2025, we took it as a "threat to global trade!" and painted it as an aggressive, dishonest attempt to "dominate" the world market, fuel neo-imperialist/expansionist military ambitions, and subvert the US industrial supply chain. Of course, we ignored that such an initiative is the obvious, sensible direction for a developing nation that is integrating itself into high-value-added industry and trade; and forgot that we had done quite literally the exact same thing (if not worse) for most of the cold war.

Much of this zeitgeist is a product of Cold War era cultural Oikophilia, wherein everything Freedom and Liberty and Democracy and Human Rights and blah blah blah was ascribed to the West and considered the ultimate "good" in the world; whereas The Enemy™ was painted as the antithesis to those concepts, and thus always should be seen as the ultimate "bad." When you think about it like that, especially when you consider that the fundamental framework for our "system of morality" is derived from religious iconography of a similar style (God == ultimate "good" & Devil == ultimate "bad" - and any "good" done by the Devil is always actually "bad" no matter how it may look at first), then our aversion towards acknowledging good deeds by The Enemy™ is a little more comprehensible.

In my opinion, CN deserves to be proud of what they've accomplished; so it's incredibly frustrating watching us seethe and whine instead of just trying to do better. We didn't win the Space Race by kneecapping the Soviet space program, we won it by building our own.
Too many moral reasons. Its just the usual hegemonic clash. The current (and others in the past) hegemon cannot accept a rising power. China could invent a cure for cancer and a warp drive and it will would still have to face US attacks.

The stakes for the hegemon are way too high to simply accept a rising power to take its proper place. The US (as with others in the past) have built their entire economy on the basic premise that they are the undisputed hegemon and that their dollar is the global currency. China challenging them, is a proper life and death battle for the US. There is simply no way they can compromise on that

You say MIC2025 is a good thing for China and the US should be happy with this, but dig a little deeper and you will see that its a disaster for the US.
 
Top