Miscellaneous News

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Many of us in the states have a deeply-engrained sense that only our side is capable of doing anything "good," and that anything "the enemy" does is just a clever ruse, a cynical exploitation, or a propaganda stunt to lower our guard.

We can see this most evidently in our attitude towards BRI. China has been successfully coupling itself to smaller economies, providing infrastructure and capital for lesser-developed nations, and broadly enhancing its global prestige in the process. Instead of acknowledging this fact and coming up with a better alternative for these nations, we decried it as "debt trap diplomacy" and "neocolonialism," making CN out to be an untrustworthy, predatory entity.

Another example is MIC2025, we took it as a "threat to global trade!" and painted it as an aggressive, dishonest attempt to "dominate" the world market, fuel neo-imperialist/expansionist military ambitions, and subvert the US industrial supply chain. Of course, we ignored that such an initiative is the obvious, sensible direction for a developing nation that is integrating itself into high-value-added industry and trade; and forgot that we had done quite literally the exact same thing (if not worse) for most of the cold war.

Much of this zeitgeist is a product of Cold War era cultural Oikophilia, wherein everything Freedom and Liberty and Democracy and Human Rights and blah blah blah was ascribed to the West and considered the ultimate "good" in the world; whereas The Enemy™ was painted as the antithesis to those concepts, and thus always should be seen as the ultimate "bad." When you think about it like that, especially when you consider that the fundamental framework for our "system of morality" is derived from religious iconography of a similar style (God == ultimate "good" & Devil == ultimate "bad" - and any "good" done by the Devil is always actually "bad" no matter how it may look at first), then our aversion towards acknowledging good deeds by The Enemy™ is a little more comprehensible.

In my opinion, CN deserves to be proud of what they've accomplished; so it's incredibly frustrating watching us seethe and whine instead of just trying to do better. We didn't win the Space Race by kneecapping the Soviet space program, we won it by building our own.
Too many moral reasons. Its just the usual hegemonic clash. The current (and others in the past) hegemon cannot accept a rising power. China could invent a cure for cancer and a warp drive and it will would still have to face US attacks.

The stakes for the hegemon are way too high to simply accept a rising power to take its proper place. The US (as with others in the past) have built their entire economy on the basic premise that they are the undisputed hegemon and that their dollar is the global currency. China challenging them, is a proper life and death battle for the US. There is simply no way they can compromise on that

You say MIC2025 is a good thing for China and the US should be happy with this, but dig a little deeper and you will see that its a disaster for the US.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Seeing as I'm doing my degree in this field, reproducibility is unfortunately one of the weak parts of biotech research, despite it being one of the fundamental tenets of the scientific method. Dubious practices are much more regular than anyone would like, with much of it attributed to limited funding and the very stiff competition for it. Publish or perish is a real thing, so the pressure is on to write and publish as many papers as feasible to attract funding (as flawed as they may or may not be). If someone in the same field writes a paper on the same discovery before you, you can say goodbye to getting that funding. There is plenty of perverse incentive to either misrepresent and/or doctor results if one is desperate enough for money to fund their research. The problem is structural at this point, so anything short of a complete overhaul of how we fund research won't be curtailing that problem.
publish or perish is real in every field, but I've never seen it anywhere as bad as biology.
 

measuredingabens

Junior Member
Registered Member
Too many moral reasons. Its just the usual hegemonic clash. The current (and others in the past) hegemon cannot accept a rising power. China could invent a cure for cancer and a warp drive and it will would still have to face US attacks.

The stakes for the hegemon are way too high to simply accept a rising power to take its proper place. The US (as with others in the past) have built their entire economy on the basic premise that they are the undisputed hegemon and that their dollar is the global currency. China challenging them, is a proper life and death battle for the US. There is simply no way they can compromise on that

You say MIC2025 is a good thing for China and the US should be happy with this, but dig a little deeper and you will see that its a disaster for the US.
At the same time, rationalisation is still a significant part of the decisionmaking process, regardless of the underlying reasons one might have for a decision. In order to garner support for a policy the ability to spin a popular narrative is important, especially if there are a number of people who actually believe in such rationals or moralisations. Buy in from one's voter base or even opposition party or parties are an integral part in ensuring the continuation of a policy. While no doubt hegemony is one of, if not the largest parts of the current hostility towards China by the US, rationals and narratives that are spun for it still make up a significant part because they are a driver of support for such policies.
 
Last edited:

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
This probably lies at the core of American culture being the best representation of a "peach culture" - superficially very friendly but inaccessible and hostile at heart. Americans only to be friendly as not to get into (shooting) fight with each other but not as friendly as to have to sacrifice for or share with others who they don't approve because they have almost never had the need to do so while in old cultures this type of cooperation was a necessity whether you liked someone or not.
That is not that bad here in Europe. But still, you shouldn't take Westerners you just met at their face value. As far as I see most immigrants from outside of the West never get this. The facade of friendliness is the default here, unlike in Asia. A smiling face or, in the US case, small talks never mean that the person in front of you is not hostile to you.

As far as I see, the biggest red flag immigrants almost always miss is the refusal to clear misunderstandings. Like how a lot of Americans think all Chinese food is greasy or there is a war in Turkey, etc... If someone has such a generalizing bad opinion and that opinion doesn't change regardless of what you say, that person is hostile to you. That "We don't care about correcting our misunderstandings" is how modern Western passive-aggression works. Americans practice it a lot more. Most immigrants mistake it for innocent ignorance but it isn't. People who were born or grew up in the West have an instinctual understanding of how this works thus you have woke politics. This is why progressives obsess over tiny nuances. Unfortunately, all of this is also why you see immigrants from "third world" voting for Republicans in the USA. They take them at face value and they think progressives are dumb.


Another example is MIC2025, we took it as a "threat to global trade!" and painted it as an aggressive, dishonest attempt to "dominate" the world market, fuel neo-imperialist/expansionist military ambitions, and subvert the US industrial supply chain. Of course, we ignored that such an initiative is the obvious, sensible direction for a developing nation that is integrating itself into high-value-added industry and trade; and forgot that we had done quite literally the exact same thing (if not worse) for most of the cold war.
The US still does it. The most recent examples would be the CHIPS act and the Inflation Reduction Act. Pentagon also routinely subsidizes various industries. The Silicon Valley came into existence pretty much because of US military investment in electronics,
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US Discusses Fund to Backstop Deposits If More Banks Fail​

  • FDIC, Fed weigh special vehicle after SVB swiftly collapses
  • Regulators are racing to stem the fallout for other banks




At the rate this is developing, I would not be surprised if next week we hear a story about how Yellen already called her Chinese counterpart over this phone this weekend.
Apparently some customers of Wells Fargo were having trouble withdrawing and transferring money and it could be from Wells Fargo doing a 'bail in' ie using customer deposits just to make payments.
Hand over Taiwan also, no conditions.
Taiwan is China's by rights, what right does the US have to give something that originally belonged to China? Better for the US to give up Hawaii, Alaska and the continent of Australia (notice how i discounted the australian government, incorporated in new york?).

Here's the senile Peterson's tweet. He should just stick to what he knows best and that's crying.

jordan peterson just RTed fetish porn of some white guys with the matrix filter over it because he thought it was a chinese breeding facility
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
March 11, 2023
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
i did some...uh, research into that site and it's apparently a kink fetish in the very Anglo culture of the UK, where Anglos can PAY to get their dicks milked. This is an actual facility, an actual business that is patronised by the Anglos. I wouldn't kink shame anyone but given the highly sexually repressed shame culture of the Anglos, they ought to be humiliated and shamed.
They put it into their propaganda against China!!
Narcissism much?

Re SVB, did you know the fair and objective Free Press of the Anglosphere rated SVB as one fo the world's best banks?
 

ficker22

Senior Member
Registered Member
This thing happened many times. There were photos from a BDSM club in Taiwan which were posted as leaked photos of torture in Uyghur concentration camps. Fetish and BDSM material getting posted as "leaked CCP atrocities" is not a very obscure event. It happens every 1-2 years and we only see ones that get viral. I bet you'd see it happening regularly if you follow enough anti china and falun gong accounts
Somebody has to search for it....

And 100% some sus website is advertising "Weeghür ZZZP male milking/ force impreg" stuff......
 
Top