Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum said:

@ACuriousPLAFan whos that certain Chinese history expert on Twitter you're referring? It can't be Carl Zha is it? He's not a pseudo expert but a very well-read, well-versed person in everything about Chinese history.

Click to expand...

No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:


Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.

Overbom said:

By our favourite gardener, Mr. Borrell.
Seems that Wang Yi was quite clear here. No weapons for Russia
View attachment 107892

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628060074294870016

Click to expand...

Well good thing Russia and Ukraine are not at war isn’t it? It’s just a special military operation and thus far I haven’t seen any one of the two direct belligerents officially declare war on the other.

Stating China doesn’t provide weapons to countries at war and that China isn’t providing weapons to Russia are just listing two independent facts. If EU vegetable Borrell wants to link the two, that’s his choice, but it doesn’t represent the official policy of China.

ACuriousPLAFan said:

No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:
View attachment 107895

Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.

Click to expand...

No different than this dumb dumb westoid bum, larping as Chinese expert, Bill Hayton author of this propagandist book:




In all probability, the person behind that Twitter page is a westoid or worst, a self-loathing, self-appointed China expert that despises himself for not being born huwhite. I have the book because I thought I could be dispassionate enough to avoid getting mad reading a perspective from a propagandist point of view. I could not read beyond 20 pages before wanting to kill the man in my head or think of ways to beat him up metaphorically. It was not worth getting so riled up, so I stopped reading the book completely.

Here's his debate with Carl Zha where Bill Hayton was predictably out of his element against a real Chinese Historian.

Give it a rest. Nobody gives a damn except Americans and American stooges.

ACuriousPLAFan said:

No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:
View attachment 107895

Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.

Click to expand...

I got my Twitter account blocked because this guy said something like the Japanese were innocent during ww2. I told him he could "off himself" twitter didn't agree with my language...

It just made my blood boil.

NBC: China would like 'prolonged' war in Ukraine to keep U.S. 'tied down':

Bellum_Romanum said:

No different than this dumb dumb westoid bum, larping as Chinese expert, Bill Hayton author of this propagandist book:

View attachment 107896
View attachment 107897

In all probability, the person behind that Twitter page is a westoid or worst, a self-loathing, self-appointed China expert that despises himself for not being born huwhite. I have the book because I thought I could be dispassionate enough to avoid getting mad reading a perspective from a propagandist point of view. I could not read beyond 20 pages before wanting to kill the man in my head or think of ways to beat him up metaphorically. It was not worth getting so riled up, so I stopped reading the book completely.

Here's his debate with Carl Zha where Bill Hayton was predictably out of his element against a real Chinese Historian.

Click to expand...

Ah, this guy. Hayton is probably the perfect mix of malice of and ignorance in tempting people to punch him in the face. Even a cursory reading between the lines would show his argument boils down to splitting China into different ethnostates based on a mix ignorance and plain misinformation. Just shows how low the bar is to be taken seriously by western media.

Think tankie coping and seething over chinese kids playing with their parents

BlackWindMnt said:

More like how many child skeletons are buried in canadian soil.

Click to expand...

A lot... until the 1920 child death ratio was over 25% it was way worse in orphanages and residential school systems and for a way longer time. Childs where dying in masses before and after 5 years old.


They talk about 3000 to 6000 death on news for Canadian Indian residential school system, but over 150 000 where taken to these facilities during that time. I think the real number would be in the tens of thousands. Just because of children mortality rates of the time and the tenure of these facilities sadly.

Kids in orphanages where often burn or buried on orphanage grounds so number of skeletons are probably way lower than total number of dead. In an orphanage in my home town, they where burning them in the trash furnace... article in french:


It was a sad part of history for all kids in these facilities from any ancestry. The biggest problem for the natives is that they where taken from their parents to put them in these hell holes.

Breadbox said:

Hopefully never, an independent Mongolia is a necessary reality check for ethnic separatists who believe they can make it out-there on their own. It's also helpful reminder to those who unironically believe chanting Western buzzwords will magically solve all their problems, and somehow westerners will make it rain if they chant them loud enough.

Click to expand...

China has no need for outer Mongolia, even the most backwards provinces which are headaches for the government are not as backwards as outer Mongolia.

Just because the country can become larger doesn't mean it should become larger.

When Mongolia is its own country but dependent on China/Russia, Mongolia will send resources to China as well as what little useful talent they can occasionally make, all this is paid for by Mongolia itself. Whereas if Mongolia was reincorporated into China, the living standards, resource development and education of them must be paid from China's pockets.

Inner Mongolia is the part that is rather industrialized and has skilled workforce.