Miscellaneous News

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
@ACuriousPLAFan whos that certain Chinese history expert on Twitter you're referring? It can't be Carl Zha is it? He's not a pseudo expert but a very well-read, well-versed person in everything about Chinese history.
No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:
civtw.jpg

Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
By our favourite gardener, Mr. Borrell.
Seems that Wang Yi was quite clear here. No weapons for Russia
View attachment 107892


Well good thing Russia and Ukraine are not at war isn’t it? It’s just a special military operation and thus far I haven’t seen any one of the two direct belligerents officially declare war on the other.

Stating China doesn’t provide weapons to countries at war and that China isn’t providing weapons to Russia are just listing two independent facts. If EU vegetable Borrell wants to link the two, that’s his choice, but it doesn’t represent the official policy of China.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:
View attachment 107895

Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.
No different than this dumb dumb westoid bum, larping as Chinese expert, Bill Hayton author of this propagandist book:

Screenshot_20230226_103102.jpg
9780300264807.jpg

In all probability, the person behind that Twitter page is a westoid or worst, a self-loathing, self-appointed China expert that despises himself for not being born huwhite. I have the book because I thought I could be dispassionate enough to avoid getting mad reading a perspective from a propagandist point of view. I could not read beyond 20 pages before wanting to kill the man in my head or think of ways to beat him up metaphorically. It was not worth getting so riled up, so I stopped reading the book completely.

Here's his debate with Carl Zha where Bill Hayton was predictably out of his element against a real Chinese Historian.

 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
No, Carl Zha is great, I do suggest you guys to follow him.

The "cHiNeSe hIsToRy eXpErT" which I referred to is this mothafuka right here:
View attachment 107895

Go have a read at his tweets - Your blood is gonna boil.

Oh, and this guy is based in Taiwan, a renegade province known for rewriting their history textbooks. So, no surprise there.
I got my Twitter account blocked because this guy said something like the Japanese were innocent during ww2. I told him he could "off himself" twitter didn't agree with my language...:rolleyes:

It just made my blood boil.
 

measuredingabens

Junior Member
Registered Member
No different than this dumb dumb westoid bum, larping as Chinese expert, Bill Hayton author of this propagandist book:

View attachment 107896
View attachment 107897

In all probability, the person behind that Twitter page is a westoid or worst, a self-loathing, self-appointed China expert that despises himself for not being born huwhite. I have the book because I thought I could be dispassionate enough to avoid getting mad reading a perspective from a propagandist point of view. I could not read beyond 20 pages before wanting to kill the man in my head or think of ways to beat him up metaphorically. It was not worth getting so riled up, so I stopped reading the book completely.

Here's his debate with Carl Zha where Bill Hayton was predictably out of his element against a real Chinese Historian.

Ah, this guy. Hayton is probably the perfect mix of malice of and ignorance in tempting people to punch him in the face. Even a cursory reading between the lines would show his argument boils down to splitting China into different ethnostates based on a mix ignorance and plain misinformation. Just shows how low the bar is to be taken seriously by western media.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
More like how many child skeletons are buried in canadian soil.
A lot... until the 1920 child death ratio was over 25% it was way worse in orphanages and residential school systems and for a way longer time. Childs where dying in masses before and after 5 years old.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They talk about 3000 to 6000 death on news for Canadian Indian residential school system, but over 150 000 where taken to these facilities during that time. I think the real number would be in the tens of thousands. Just because of children mortality rates of the time and the tenure of these facilities sadly.

Kids in orphanages where often burn or buried on orphanage grounds so number of skeletons are probably way lower than total number of dead. In an orphanage in my home town, they where burning them in the trash furnace... article in french:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It was a sad part of history for all kids in these facilities from any ancestry. The biggest problem for the natives is that they where taken from their parents to put them in these hell holes.
 
Last edited:
Top