Miscellaneous News

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
China will lose WWIII if it fails to addresse the India situation.. They aren't threat by themselves but they can be used as mercenaries.. It's a country of servitude and live for to serve others hence they will also provide the hand to eventually undo you all tho they themselves don't pose threat but anyone who has ambitions to march into China could make use of them..

This is why China will eventually get defeated by the Americans not because the Americans are strong just smarter geo-politically and empire building.

You can't grow if you don't understand what blocks your path or what can or could be a threat against you

In the words of Malcolm X..
View attachment 103629
You seem to advocate China to follow the American's footstep in wasting resources on secondary target for endless time (Iraq and Afghanistan for US, and India for China).

You also seem to advocate what the US has been doing in provoking China and India to fight one another for ever. A play book of divide and conquer. The US is doing in the manner of "India is the next champion of Democrazy against evil China". You are serving the same end by doing in the other direction "China to break India before taking on US."

Taking together your disapproval of China-Iran relationship, I am sure you are not speaking from the Chinese side, nor are you speaking for the Indians, but for the US, knowingly or simply out of ignorance. The core is to make China isolated and distracted.

BTW, your quoting is pretty much missing the essence of what Malcom X intended to say. Whatever Nehru did was judged on his impact on India. Any Chinese leaders are judged on their impact on China's future. Mao did great by beating India in 1960s. Any Chinese leader today wasting time on fighting India while letting US to sleep comfortably is worse than Nehro did to India, and he would not have been respected by Malcom X.

Americans would be smart (China would be stupid) if China actually follows your suggestion.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Maybe we are exporting a bit too much fentanyl?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



As Ronald Reagan famously quipped on his debates with Carter and Mondale

America has already declared Mission Accomplished and itself the winner of this geopolitical contest rather impetuously cqgand prematurely. The arrogance of these folks are stupefyingly terrifying.
 
Last edited:

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Maybe we are exporting a bit too much fentanyl?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
To be fair, Washington is extremely shortsighted.

The current USA victory plan seems to be to do ??? and then Crimea-action Taiwan when the mainland isn't looking and get fait accompli before the PLA can do anything. But such a plan address none of America's actual problems or China's strengths.

Even if US troops march in Taipei, China remains the world's largest economy. Perhaps losing a short limited war with America will put China in a lost decade similar to Japan. But they will still keep what economy they have, even if it is in stagflation.

Under communist rule, China devotes about 1.4% GDP to military spending. If the communist is toppled due to force, the conclusion of the people will be that they didn't try to fight hard enough.

1.4% of the world's no1 economy buys you the current PLA, that is a fair bit smaller than US military but is considered roughly equal in quality give or take some asymmetric advantages and disadvantages.

As a reference, (hard to find an exact number), but it would seem that Imperial Japan right before WW2 was spending 15-20% of its GDP on its armed forces.

Therefore as I see it, as long as US walks the path of confrontation with China, American defeat is guaranteed.

Even if lady luck gives America a natural 20 and it accomplishes all of it's current victory plan, all it does is delay the inevitable because there is a (large) difference in strength when it comes to national foundation, and both sides can't touch each other's foundations in a meaningful way due to MAD.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Maybe we are exporting a bit too much fentanyl?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This is all for foreigners to stop doing business with China getting them scared losing their money. Like I've been saying in previous posts, no one talks about the importance of natural resources that the Western world doesn't have within their own borders that exists in the non-Western world they look down at. It's a grand weakness of the West they don't want anyone seeing. During the US/Africa summit that just took place, all you have to do is read comment sections to any articles talking about it. A lot of people mockingly talk about how the West shouldn't bother with insignificant Africa because they've been brainwashed into believing the US and West need no one while the rest of the world needs them.

The reason why they put that out there is to get their citizens believing their leaders are doing a great job for them to be able to brag it thus those leaders will keep elected positions. The Ukraine war shows how easily supply chains can be disrupted and can be cut-off to the West. The West's unprecedented "Hail Mary" actions is because of desperation at seeing a changing world moving away from them. The West claims they're the preferred choice of the world. Well then they shouldn't be worried about China. This is to claim China is doing something underhanded against the West hence why they shouldn't buy anything from China.

Even longer before they want to believe everyone in the world naturally wants to worship Westerners as gods. Because there are those in the world that don't, it's because they're being prevented from worshipping them as gods, thus their human rights are being violated and their own citizens should be okay with more extreme actions against those countries including sacrificing their own lives going to war with countries that deny their own people from worshipping the West. People around the world are moving away from the West... That's what's natural. You see even Europeans that liberals in the US paint as more evolved saying stupid things like Europe is a garden while the rest is a jungle.

This all is a game of chicken the West chooses to play and they are worst players in history. Their desperation comes from realizing what they arrogantly believed before is not true like thinking China was going to immediately surrender to all US demands by cutting-off computer chips or threatening to cancel China. The West can't admit they were wrong so they keep doubling down on bad bets. The West is cancelling itself.
 

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Australia owes its economic boom to China, and it should think twice about moving on​

  • After recent tensions, Australia’s new relationship with China can be described as blind political adventurism mixed with juvenile opportunism – and it will regret this

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and China’s President Xi Jinping shake hands before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Leaders’ Summit in Bali, Indonesia, on November 15. Photo: EPA-EFE

Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and China’s President Xi Jinping shake hands before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Leaders’ Summit in Bali, Indonesia, on November 15. Photo: EPA-EFE

Australia and China are set to mark 50 years since establishing diplomatic relations in 1972. What should have been a celebration of a blossoming exchange of economic, cultural and academic endeavours between the two countries will, instead, be marked by a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The late 1970s and much throughout the 1980s were transformative years for both countries, as Australia began deregulating its industries and opening up to the world around the same time Deng Xiaoping embarked on revolutionising China through its open-door economic policy.

As a result, Beijing needed resources to build the country from the ground up. Australia, conveniently located, had an abundant supply of raw materials for construction, industrialisation and the transformation of China from an agrarian society to a global manufacturing hub.

The win-win trading formula touted by Beijing allowed Canberra to experience exponential growth as a by-product of its success, shielding the country from the 1997 Asian financial crisis and 2008 global financial crisis. China is Australia’s largest export partner, with iron ore and coal exports accounting for 57 per cent of total exports before the Covid-19 pandemic.


From 1995-2015, Australia’s economy grew three times faster than Japan, twice as fast as Europe, and one-third more quickly than the United States. Before Covid-19, Australia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for Chinese tourists, with 1.43 million visiting the country in 2019, residing for extended periods and spending more than other nationalities.
As a result, by 2017, passenger airlines that flew between the two countries had increased to 15 airlines from four in 2009. There were also 200,000 Chinese students studying in Australia, accounting for one-third of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Relations peaked in 2014 when President Xi Jinping
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. A defining feature between the countries until 2017 was having no outstanding historical, political or economic grievances, which was a rarity in international relations.

Australian prime minister Tony Abbott (centre) and other members of parliament listen at Parliament House in Canberra on November 17, 2014, as Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks, after the two countries signed a declaration of intent on a landmark free trade deal. Photo: Reuters


Australian prime minister Tony Abbott (centre) and other members of parliament listen at Parliament House in Canberra on November 17, 2014, as Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks, after the two countries signed a declaration of intent on a landmark free trade deal. Photo: Reuters

But Australia’s insecurity and fantasy about being invaded (which has historically extended to Japan, Indonesia and now China) caused a monumental shift when it took an abrasive position with its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, aimed at the country.


The Australian government has gone on to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from bidding for its 5G network,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the origins of Covid-19,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the memorandum of understanding signed by the Victoria state government to join the Belt and Road Initiative, and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
takeover bids by Chinese companies despite the deals being cleared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

Australia’s current relationship with China can be described as blind political adventurism mixed with juvenile opportunism. Australia’s economy was hit with its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
two years ago and continues to struggle.

After rabid opposition to China in the past few years, Canberra now seeks to lift
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
which have jolted its economy and are bound to increase pain as Australia prioritises ideology in aligning with the US over trade and the well-being of people in affected industries.


Trade ‘only one part of the battle‘ in China-Australia dispute, says legal expert Bryan Mercurio​

The US has been
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in Northern Australia, creating a secondary logistics hub similar to Guam. As Canberra grins ear to ear in becoming the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the US, it is losing its middle-power status in the eyes of Beijing, and its impartiality in playing a leading role in de-escalating tensions between the great powers if an event were to emerge regarding Taiwan.

China has maintained its one-China policy from the outset and intends to reunify with its territories, a “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” explained very clearly since establishing diplomatic relations with countries such as Australia, which
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on that recognition.

Think tanks such as the Australian Strategic Policy Institute continue to antagonise rather than resolve tensions, suggesting the country buy 12 recently unveiled B-21 stealth bombers to counter China’s ballistic missiles. Such rhetoric is ill-conceived, especially as Australia’s Defence Force spends A$14 million (US$9.5 million) a year buying Chinese-made uniforms, safety goggles and gloves.

The next 50 years will probably see further attempts by Australia to diversify away from China. But it will quickly realise that no nation has the hunger or appetite for natural resources as China does. When the dust settles and Australia recovers from its self-inflicted wound, it will realise that China has the world to trade with, but Australia’s economic success was made in China.
 
Top