China is incorporating both in their Arsenal, the fancy stuff and the budget stuff at the same time. That is the interesting thing of US permanent adventurism is that allows other global powers to see what works and whatnot for free, ever since their relative good performance in the Gulf War 1991 to the relative bad performance in the Gulf War 2026.
Is it really asking that?DW is butthurt that Chinese ownership of MG had managed revitalized the failing British automotive company.
DW is trying to ask the golden question: But at what cost?
At damn well lower cost than if you let the Germans or Americans run MG.
China Geely saved Sweden Volvo.Is it really asking that?
The headline says "China saved this British Legend", the conclusion says "MG has a thrilling future"
Most of the people are pretty complementary
From what I see in UK car publications, most do not see the Chinese ownership as harmful. The UK government had already destroyed any brand equity in the 70's/80's with the British Leyland group. BMW further chopped it up to pieces. The fact that MG is still existing, and actually in fact is quite popular in the UK and Australia is better than nothing.
DW is butthurt that Chinese ownership of MG had managed revitalized the failing British automotive company.
DW is trying to ask the golden question: But at what cost?
At damn well lower cost than if you let the Germans or Americans run MG.
The only real solution is Industry 404 (not found).
This meme would be more realistic if in the bottom panel, the lights were also out.