Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
good summary of the current China Australia iron ore debacle

high time, Anglo Australia got with the program and stopped behaving like whites supremacy is still in fashion. If it were up to me I’d force every ASX 200 company to accept and pay for CPC commissars and monitors in every board room with total executive power.

But if you really wanted to know what was my hearts desire, it’s to have teams of PAP justiciars and spec ops with the full inquisitorial authority to perform no knock raids on whites supremacist Anglo Australian groups and individuals in Australia, starting with the neonazis at last months parades across Australia, and members of ASPI?

because face it, the Anglo atlanticisr west knows it has to pull back

china as it is, has always been a proxy or a reflection of whatever’s inside a westerns mind whenever he transfers and projects his own issues, much like how Zionist atlanticists accused China of Uighur organ harvesting then turned around and tore organs out of Palestineans and arabs for Jewish bodies.
 
Last edited:

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to your understanding, was destroying Nazi Germany also wrong? You can't simply lump all wars into the same category. The Chinese call people like you "white leftists" or "saints."
"Do you think there are more good people or more evil people in this world? Of course there are more good people. Then why is there never peace in the world, and why are evil people always rampant? Because goodness that doesn't distinguish between good and evil is not good, but an accomplice of evil."
You have reached your current conclusion because you can't distinguish between good and evil. The PLA liberated Tibet and destroyed the slavery that had ruled Tibet for thousands of years. Do you also think this is wrong?
Oh, you people are too young. Yes, us sane folks can all agree on clear actions that can be classed under good and evil but for the most part it's subjective. Many Americans hate communism and the Communist Party of China, according to them it's evil and they should do away with it, they believe the world will be a better place. The same Europeans who are justifying colonialism, forced settlement, mass displacement of natives, genocide and slavery are the same people who are moaning about immigrants that have flooded their countries. They tell you it was "conquest", I tell them well after Russia slices Ukraine and takes a chunk of it then it's rightfully theirs because it's conquest as well. In other words: "when I do it, it's good. When the others do it, then it's wrong!"

So you think going to Japan and forcefully removing their emperor and killing the institution will get you a round of applause and you'll be greeted as great liberators for being the good guys? Don't be naive. The same way you're looking at them (the institution) as evil is the same way folks are looking at the CPC and it's brand of politics as evil and they've dedicated resources to bring it down. Outside of retribution, I simply can't see the point of forcefully abolishing their monarchy. Why bring the heat on yourselves? Why create a hostile environment? There's a reason why even the Americans didn't do it and resisted the urge to do so even though they would've been justified. The cost of having a potential hostile population was too great and so they thought better of it and decided to keep it but neuter the institution. You don't play the game with your emotions, if you do you've lost.
 

Puss in Boots

Junior Member
Registered Member
Oh, you people are too young. Yes, us sane folks can all agree on clear actions that can be classed under good and evil but for the most part it's subjective. Many Americans hate communism and the Communist Party of China, according to them it's evil and they should do away with it, they believe the world will be a better place. The same Europeans who are justifying colonialism, forced settlement, mass displacement of natives, genocide and slavery are the same people who are moaning about immigrants that have flooded their countries. They tell you it was "conquest", I tell them well after Russia slices Ukraine and takes a chunk of it then it's rightfully theirs because it's conquest as well. In other words: "when I do it, it's good. When the others do it, then it's wrong!"

So you think going to Japan and forcefully removing their emperor and killing the institution will get you a round of applause and you'll be greeted as great liberators for being the good guys? Don't be naive. The same way you're looking at them (the institution) as evil is the same way folks are looking at the CPC and it's brand of politics as evil and they've dedicated resources to bring it down. Outside of retribution, I simply can't see the point of forcefully abolishing their monarchy. Why bring the heat on yourselves? Why create a hostile environment? There's a reason why even the Americans didn't do it and resisted the urge to do so even though they would've been justified. The cost of having a potential hostile population was too great and so they thought better of it and decided to keep it but neuter the institution. You don't play the game with your emotions, if you do you've lost.
Good and evil are something you have to understand for yourself, not someone else telling you!
You keep repeating Western media propaganda, and I find it hard to believe you're an independent thinker.
Europe's centuries of colonization of Africa were undoubtedly evil. But can the West now claim the Communist Party was evil? Can they find any strong evidence? Look at a map published in China, and you'll be surprised to find that Crimea still doesn't belong to Russia. Do you understand the meaning of this?
Why did the Russo-Ukrainian war break out? I believe you haven't done any careful research, because in your eyes, anything that opens fire is wrong. As for color revolutions, they're all about pursuing democracy and freedom, and are just!
We're not asking for trouble, but others are picking on us. Is the emergence of the far right a result of our own creation of a hostile environment? What allowed Sanae Takaichi to appear here? Why don't you think about this?
As for why the United States allows Japan to retain these old systems, that's a very complex question. Simply put, Japan is currently a colony of the United States. Colonies don't need a normal political environment; as long as they can serve as a bridgehead for anti-China and anti-communist movements and can be controlled by the United States, that's enough.
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
Such friendly words from the Indian Army Chief to Pakistan.
Indian media is hyping up Operation Sindoor 2.0. The language is getting more aggressive. Are they actually preparing for something? Or is this yet more Jai Hind hot air?

This, after an apparent Pakistani military buildup near Sir Creek.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
On Thursday Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said attempts to illegally occupy more of India, i.e., its half of Sir Creek, will be met with a response that will change "history and geography".

Singh said India remains open to a peaceful resolution of the border dispute in Gujarat (and other areas) but "Pakistan's intentions are flawed and unclear". The recent expansion of military infrastructure -bunkers and radars, as well as forward bases capable of launching attack drones or infantry operations - in adjacent areas reveal that country's intentions, he said

Yeah, India is such a benevolent and peaceful Supapowar. Threatening to erase another nation off the map is such a language of peace. Jai Hind!
 

JohnnyD

Junior Member
Registered Member
Exactly who is China trying to impress? Atlanticist European middle class sensibilities who are secretly happy that Asians are killing each other?
If China determines the annexation of the Japanese islands and the destruction of Japanese nationhood to be in the national interest then so be it; the empire of Japan should have followed the same footsteps as the xiongnu and the khitans.

victor gao was being diplomatic as a reflection of current PRC policy to appear to be magnanimous towards India even as it attempts to suck up to the Anglos despite being beaten by them.



Don’t forget Australia as well; the Pine Gap facility will be used to coordinate communications as part of the kill chain. A IRBM there should put paid to that but expect to also have to conquer Australia as well in the third act.


This is like when deepseek first debuted, the western spy agencies mounted 24/7 cyber attacks on the website and tech company.
That men have the Isreal flag
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Argentina tightens sorghum rules to boost China trade, risking new clash with Trump team​

Argentina has tightened export standards for sorghum to strengthen sales to China, a move that could add new strain to relations with the United States, once the main supplier of the grain before tariffs upended global trade.

The Agriculture Secretariat issued a resolution on Friday, setting new grading rules based on test weight and limiting impurities, broken kernels and non-grain material.

Exports must now meet minimum weights of 72, 70 and 67 kilograms per hectolitre depending on grade. Cargoes below those levels no longer qualify for standard export certification.

The measure also updated how sorghum is graded to meet foreign feed and processing requirements, according to the resolution, which said the changes would help avoid cargo rejections and strengthen Argentina’s reliability as a supplier.

In a statement, the agency said the measure was meant to “facilitate domestic marketing, raise the quality of national production and improve Argentina’s position in more demanding markets”. Officials said it aligns local standards with those used by key trading partners.
The resolution replaced a 1994 rule and cited China’s rise as Argentina’s main sorghum buyer since 2021, saying “higher export volumes make it necessary to adapt quality parameters to global demands”.

Its language effectively tied the update to China’s import requirements, signalling that the new grades were designed to meet that market’s expectations on grain quality and consistency.

Government data showed China has become Argentina’s dominant sorghum buyer, taking nearly all shipments this year. Between January and August, Argentina exported 1.23 million tonnes of sorghum, of which 1.22 million tonnes went to China.

Officials said the tighter standards were designed to keep that trade steady by improving cargo consistency and traceability.

The new rules highlight Argentina’s push to expand farm exports to China, where US suppliers once held the upper hand. Before the first round of tariffs under US President Donald Trump, American farmers filled about 90 per cent of China’s sorghum demand. Beijing’s retaliatory duties sent Chinese buyers looking to South America instead.

That competition resurfaced in Washington last month after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was photographed at the United Nations General Assembly reading a message that appeared to criticise Argentina for dropping grain export taxes soon after receiving a US$20 billion financial package from the United States.

The text, reportedly from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, quoted an Iowa grain trader saying the policy had hurt American farmers.

“We bailed out Argentina yesterday and in return Argentina removed their export tariffs on grains, reducing their price to China at a time when we would normally be selling to China,” the message said.

“Soy prices are dropping further because of it. This gives China more leverage on us.”

The episode drew attention to divisions inside the Trump administration over how to balance financial aid for Buenos Aires with efforts to counter Chinese influence in South America.

Under the bailout terms, Argentina had been expected to scale back financial cooperation with Beijing, including an US$18 billion currency swap line.

Yet days before the UN meetings, President Javier Milei’s government suspended export levies on soy, corn and wheat, prompting $7 billion in new export declarations within 48 hours, most bound for China.

Those shipments coincided with a shift in Chinese buying patterns. In August, traders said China had already booked 12 million tonnes of soybeans from Brazil and Argentina for September and October, covering about half its needs and narrowing the export window for US producers.

Brazil has also moved to capitalise. After Presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Xi Jinping signed a deal in November to open sorghum trade, Brazil’s agriculture ministry urged farmers to boost maize and sorghum output, though large-scale investment would depend on firm buying commitments from Beijing.

Brazil and Argentina have since captured much of the Chinese demand that once went to the United States, cementing South America’s role in China’s feed supply chain and leaving US farmers watching as another export season slips away.
Exports must now meet minimum weights of 72, 70 and 67 kilograms per hectolitre depending on grade. Cargoes below those levels no longer qualify for standard export certification.
The measure also updated how sorghum is graded to meet foreign feed and processing requirements, according to the resolution

Trump should bail out Argentina again.
 
Top