Miscellaneous News

Puss in Boots

New Member
Registered Member
I said deposing the Japanese monarchy will be acting in the same vain as colonizers, I stated it won't go down well and will create resentment, this will make things difficult for China. What the hell does that have to do with a Chinese person inserting themselves into an African discussion and espousing revisionist history? What revisionist history was I talking about? Heck, wtf are you even talking about? Where did I say anything about the Japanese monarchy not being bad? I ridiculed it and called it a mascot.
According to your understanding, was destroying Nazi Germany also wrong? You can't simply lump all wars into the same category. The Chinese call people like you "white leftists" or "saints."
"Do you think there are more good people or more evil people in this world? Of course there are more good people. Then why is there never peace in the world, and why are evil people always rampant? Because goodness that doesn't distinguish between good and evil is not good, but an accomplice of evil."
You have reached your current conclusion because you can't distinguish between good and evil. The PLA liberated Tibet and destroyed the slavery that had ruled Tibet for thousands of years. Do you also think this is wrong?
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
good summary of the current China Australia iron ore debacle

high time, Anglo Australia got with the program and stopped behaving like whites supremacy is still in fashion. If it were up to me I’d force every ASX 200 company to accept and pay for CPC commissars and monitors in every board room with total executive power.

But if you really wanted to know what was my hearts desire, it’s to have teams of PAP justiciars and spec ops with the full inquisitorial authority to perform no knock raids on whites supremacist Anglo Australian groups and individuals in Australia, starting with the neonazis at last months parades across Australia, and members of ASPI?

because face it, the Anglo atlanticisr west knows it has to pull back

china as it is, has always been a proxy or a reflection of whatever’s inside a westerns mind whenever he transfers and projects his own issues, much like how Zionist atlanticists accused China of Uighur organ harvesting then turned around and tore organs out of Palestineans and arabs for Jewish bodies.
 
Last edited:

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
According to your understanding, was destroying Nazi Germany also wrong? You can't simply lump all wars into the same category. The Chinese call people like you "white leftists" or "saints."
"Do you think there are more good people or more evil people in this world? Of course there are more good people. Then why is there never peace in the world, and why are evil people always rampant? Because goodness that doesn't distinguish between good and evil is not good, but an accomplice of evil."
You have reached your current conclusion because you can't distinguish between good and evil. The PLA liberated Tibet and destroyed the slavery that had ruled Tibet for thousands of years. Do you also think this is wrong?
Oh, you people are too young. Yes, us sane folks can all agree on clear actions that can be classed under good and evil but for the most part it's subjective. Many Americans hate communism and the Communist Party of China, according to them it's evil and they should do away with it, they believe the world will be a better place. The same Europeans who are justifying colonialism, forced settlement, mass displacement of natives, genocide and slavery are the same people who are moaning about immigrants that have flooded their countries. They tell you it was "conquest", I tell them well after Russia slices Ukraine and takes a chunk of it then it's rightfully theirs because it's conquest as well. In other words: "when I do it, it's good. When the others do it, then it's wrong!"

So you think going to Japan and forcefully removing their emperor and killing the institution will get you a round of applause and you'll be greeted as great liberators for being the good guys? Don't be naive. The same way you're looking at them (the institution) as evil is the same way folks are looking at the CPC and it's brand of politics as evil and they've dedicated resources to bring it down. Outside of retribution, I simply can't see the point of forcefully abolishing their monarchy. Why bring the heat on yourselves? Why create a hostile environment? There's a reason why even the Americans didn't do it and resisted the urge to do so even though they would've been justified. The cost of having a potential hostile population was too great and so they thought better of it and decided to keep it but neuter the institution. You don't play the game with your emotions, if you do you've lost.
 

Puss in Boots

New Member
Registered Member
Oh, you people are too young. Yes, us sane folks can all agree on clear actions that can be classed under good and evil but for the most part it's subjective. Many Americans hate communism and the Communist Party of China, according to them it's evil and they should do away with it, they believe the world will be a better place. The same Europeans who are justifying colonialism, forced settlement, mass displacement of natives, genocide and slavery are the same people who are moaning about immigrants that have flooded their countries. They tell you it was "conquest", I tell them well after Russia slices Ukraine and takes a chunk of it then it's rightfully theirs because it's conquest as well. In other words: "when I do it, it's good. When the others do it, then it's wrong!"

So you think going to Japan and forcefully removing their emperor and killing the institution will get you a round of applause and you'll be greeted as great liberators for being the good guys? Don't be naive. The same way you're looking at them (the institution) as evil is the same way folks are looking at the CPC and it's brand of politics as evil and they've dedicated resources to bring it down. Outside of retribution, I simply can't see the point of forcefully abolishing their monarchy. Why bring the heat on yourselves? Why create a hostile environment? There's a reason why even the Americans didn't do it and resisted the urge to do so even though they would've been justified. The cost of having a potential hostile population was too great and so they thought better of it and decided to keep it but neuter the institution. You don't play the game with your emotions, if you do you've lost.
Good and evil are something you have to understand for yourself, not someone else telling you!
You keep repeating Western media propaganda, and I find it hard to believe you're an independent thinker.
Europe's centuries of colonization of Africa were undoubtedly evil. But can the West now claim the Communist Party was evil? Can they find any strong evidence? Look at a map published in China, and you'll be surprised to find that Crimea still doesn't belong to Russia. Do you understand the meaning of this?
Why did the Russo-Ukrainian war break out? I believe you haven't done any careful research, because in your eyes, anything that opens fire is wrong. As for color revolutions, they're all about pursuing democracy and freedom, and are just!
We're not asking for trouble, but others are picking on us. Is the emergence of the far right a result of our own creation of a hostile environment? What allowed Sanae Takaichi to appear here? Why don't you think about this?
As for why the United States allows Japan to retain these old systems, that's a very complex question. Simply put, Japan is currently a colony of the United States. Colonies don't need a normal political environment; as long as they can serve as a bridgehead for anti-China and anti-communist movements and can be controlled by the United States, that's enough.
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
Such friendly words from the Indian Army Chief to Pakistan.
Indian media is hyping up Operation Sindoor 2.0. The language is getting more aggressive. Are they actually preparing for something? Or is this yet more Jai Hind hot air?

This, after an apparent Pakistani military buildup near Sir Creek.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
On Thursday Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said attempts to illegally occupy more of India, i.e., its half of Sir Creek, will be met with a response that will change "history and geography".

Singh said India remains open to a peaceful resolution of the border dispute in Gujarat (and other areas) but "Pakistan's intentions are flawed and unclear". The recent expansion of military infrastructure -bunkers and radars, as well as forward bases capable of launching attack drones or infantry operations - in adjacent areas reveal that country's intentions, he said

Yeah, India is such a benevolent and peaceful Supapowar. Threatening to erase another nation off the map is such a language of peace. Jai Hind!
 

Randomuser

Captain
Registered Member
Such friendly words from the Indian Army Chief to Pakistan.
Indian media is hyping up Operation Sindoor 2.0. The language is getting more aggressive. Are they actually preparing for something? Or is this yet more Jai Hind hot air?

This, after an apparent Pakistani military buildup near Sir Creek.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Yeah, India is such a benevolent and peaceful Supapowar. Threatening to erase another nation off the map is such a language of peace. Jai Hind!
Guess mods need to start preparing in advance for inevitable India vs Pakistan thread part 2.
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
According to your understanding, was destroying Nazi Germany also wrong? You can't simply lump all wars into the same category. The Chinese call people like you "white leftists" or "saints."
"Do you think there are more good people or more evil people in this world? Of course there are more good people. Then why is there never peace in the world, and why are evil people always rampant? Because goodness that doesn't distinguish between good and evil is not good, but an accomplice of evil."
You have reached your current conclusion because you can't distinguish between good and evil. The PLA liberated Tibet and destroyed the slavery that had ruled Tibet for thousands of years. Do you also think this is wrong?
Using his idiotic logic. The Third Reich shouldn't be dismantled because that is an act of "killing an institution", and its "evil". Forget about what the Nazis did in WWII. Germany had Emperors and then a Fuhrer for centuries, and such an institution should be preserved.

According to that deranged individual, only Hitler is evil, but Nazi Germany as an institution isn't. How does someone who wants to lecture people about imperialism can come up with such a conclusion?
 
Last edited:

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
Using his idiotic logic. The Third Reich shouldn't be dismantled because that is an act of "killing an institution", and its "evil". Forget about what the Nazis did in WWII. Germany had Emperors and then a Fuhrer for centuries, and nobody should dismantle that, because such an act is plain evil.

According to that deranged individual, only Hitler is evil, but Nazi Germany as an institution isn't. How does someone who wants to lecture people about imperialism can come up with such a conclusion?
No, what's deranged is a deranged psycho who wants to play empire and is twisting words to suit their subjective argument. Please quote me where I brought up Nazis. Young man go sit in a corner before I really put belt to ass and teach you a thing or two on how to debate. This is above you.
 

Sardaukar20

Major
Registered Member
No, what's deranged is a deranged psycho who wants to play empire and is twisting words to suit their subjective argument. Please quote me where I brought up Nazis. Young man go sit in a corner before I really put belt to ass and teach you a thing or two on how to debate. This is above you.
Very classy. Can't win debates, so you threaten to "put belt to ass". I'm keeping this quote for the mods and everyone else to see.
 
Top