Cognizant is so bad they have to be listed twice. Yes I know it is Indian but still.
Cognizant is so bad they have to be listed twice. Yes I know it is Indian but still.
If this move doesn't work, the US will become more deranged. I recall a proposal, probably inspired by Peter Zeihan, a few years ago about declaring an open season on Chinese merchant ships and encouraging government-funded pirates to attack them while telling the US navy & those of its allies to not respond to Chinese distress calls. The idea being that it'd be way too expensive for China to protect its merchant fleet & hunt down pirates without global ports like the US.Just like the US dollar, at end of the day which currency to use, or which shipping company can operate, and whose ships are used are decided by the world's dominant trading nation, not anyone else, and that nation is China.
I think it doesn't even matter if US goes ahead or not, the fact that they even mentioned it means it's open season for China to take control of global shipping operations and complete its monopoly on shipping.
All that will just give China the excuse to expand her navy 2-300%.If this move doesn't work, the US will become more deranged. I recall a proposal, probably inspired by Peter Zeihan, a few years ago about declaring an open season on Chinese merchant ships and encouraging government-funded pirates to attack them while telling the US navy & those of its allies to not respond to Chinese distress calls. The idea being that it'd be way too expensive for China to protect its merchant fleet & hunt down pirates without global ports like the US.
Nobel prize winners usually think in the western perspectiv after all..If this move doesn't work, the US will become more deranged. I recall a proposal, probably inspired by Peter Zeihan, a few years ago about declaring an open season on Chinese merchant ships and encouraging government-funded pirates to attack them while telling the US navy & those of its allies to not respond to Chinese distress calls. The idea being that it'd be way too expensive for China to protect its merchant fleet & hunt down pirates without global ports like the US.
Actually, I've been trying to start a thread to introduce and discuss 日耳蛮学/日耳曼赢学 (German Barbarology/Winology) for quite a few days, but I was wary it might cause some hate/racist speech...Honestly, it took the wise philosophers of Zhihu and Bilibili for me to finally understand 日耳曼赢学. And here Sleepy offers an excellent example of that.
Nobel prize winners usually think in the western perspectiv after all..

Actually, I've been trying to start a thread to introduce and discuss 日耳蛮学/日耳曼赢学 (German Barbarology/Winology) for quite a few days, but I was wary it might cause some hate/racist speech...
Guys, should I do it or not? Like for yes Sad for no, let me see some ratio pls.
The Nobel Prize is a joke, especially once you look at the list of awardees, which includes this guy:
View attachment 148501
Not looking to put down Sweden or Norway. They are both fun places to visit.
However, both Sweden and Norway are by all reasonable measures rather insignificant in the grand scheme of things, and so are the elites from those countries who select Nobel Prize awardees.
There's no valid reason to put them or their questionable judgement on a pedestal.
