Let me introduce to this things called smuggling. America couldn’t keep drugs or illegals out, but they can keep chips in?
They can’t even prevent North Korea from obtaining chips…
Let me introduce to this things called smuggling. America couldn’t keep drugs or illegals out, but they can keep chips in?
It’s would be deeply unpopular but possible.
Would definitely open up a huge can of worms and they would definitely lose customers if they went this route, but it won’t be a major technical challenge to implement
Basically: hardware subscription schemeDeeply unpopular is an understatement because it is functionally an expensive brick. It is completely unviable for businesses. Who is going to buy a brick that is worthless after 1 year.
After 6 months, computing power is ~60%
After 12 months, computing power is ~36%
After 24 months, computing power is ~13%
After 36 months, computing power is ~5%
If you need like 50,000 GPUs, then you have to spend $1.5 billion every year replacing it. This is an huge scam of planned obsolescence. It might benefit Nvidia and the others in the short term before Huawei shoves them off all off the cliff.
The first time they sell that chip, nobody will buy it anymore because its performance will be discounted vs the risk of cutoff in addition to depreciation.It’s would be deeply unpopular but possible. The CPU/GPU could have power on activation logic, paired to its serial number that’s baked into the silicon. It would require a signed activation token( from Nvidia servers passed in through the GPU driver. It would be similar to the challenge-response tokens used in bank/debit/credit cards with EVM chips.
Then NVidia will need have various KYC (know your customer) infrastructure in place, similar to what banks and financial institutions use.
Would definitely open up a huge can of worms and they would definitely lose customers if they went this route, but it won’t be a major technical challenge to implement
Basically: hardware subscription scheme
All that Persian kowtowing and Iranian begging and for what?Iran Is Developing Plans for Faster, Cruder Weapon, U.S. Concludes
As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel prepares to meet with President Trump, the question of whether to strike Iran’s facilities or negotiate with Tehran appears certain to be under debate.
Israel smells blood in the water.
The first time they sell that chip, nobody will buy it anymore because its performance will be discounted vs the risk of cutoff in addition to depreciation.
Iran has been such a bitter disappointment. All bark & no bite.Trump to reimpose 'maximum pressure' on Iran, aims to drive oil exports to zero
- Summary
- Move brings back tough US policy on Iran from Trump's first term
- Trump to hold talks with Israeli PM Netanyahu on Tuesday
- Campaign 'aimed at driving Iran's oil exports to zero'
Iran should have struck Israel when it had the chance, especially since the US is pulling back from Europe and West Pacific now.