Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
It’s would be deeply unpopular but possible.

Would definitely open up a huge can of worms and they would definitely lose customers if they went this route, but it won’t be a major technical challenge to implement

Deeply unpopular is an understatement because it is functionally an expensive brick. It is completely unviable for businesses. Who is going to buy a brick that is worthless after 1 year.

After 6 months, computing power is ~60%
After 12 months, computing power is ~36%
After 24 months, computing power is ~13%
After 36 months, computing power is ~5%

If you need like 50,000 GPUs ($30,000 each*), then you have to spend $1.5 billion every year replacing it. This is an huge scam of planned obsolescence. It might benefit Nvidia and the others in the short term before Huawei shoves them off all off the cliff.
 
Last edited:

GZDRefugee

Senior Member
Registered Member
Deeply unpopular is an understatement because it is functionally an expensive brick. It is completely unviable for businesses. Who is going to buy a brick that is worthless after 1 year.

After 6 months, computing power is ~60%
After 12 months, computing power is ~36%
After 24 months, computing power is ~13%
After 36 months, computing power is ~5%

If you need like 50,000 GPUs, then you have to spend $1.5 billion every year replacing it. This is an huge scam of planned obsolescence. It might benefit Nvidia and the others in the short term before Huawei shoves them off all off the cliff.
Basically: hardware subscription scheme
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
It’s would be deeply unpopular but possible. The CPU/GPU could have power on activation logic, paired to its serial number that’s baked into the silicon. It would require a signed activation token( from Nvidia servers passed in through the GPU driver. It would be similar to the challenge-response tokens used in bank/debit/credit cards with EVM chips.

Then NVidia will need have various KYC (know your customer) infrastructure in place, similar to what banks and financial institutions use.

Would definitely open up a huge can of worms and they would definitely lose customers if they went this route, but it won’t be a major technical challenge to implement
The first time they sell that chip, nobody will buy it anymore because its performance will be discounted vs the risk of cutoff in addition to depreciation.
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
Basically: hardware subscription scheme

IMO that is too generous of a phrase because it sounds more like mercantilism for example Britain and India. Sacks said exported TSMC chips but it did not say which TSMC chip. So that seems to imply every exported chips.

An iPhone might not even boot up Tetris (or itself) within a year. PlayStation/Xbox might not even run any games after 6 months. Computers that contain TSMC chips would be a giant door stopper in 12-18 months. It would obliterate foreign companies in China but it is hard to believe the hawks are that brain dead.
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iran Is Developing Plans for Faster, Cruder Weapon, U.S. Concludes​

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel prepares to meet with President Trump, the question of whether to strike Iran’s facilities or negotiate with Tehran appears certain to be under debate.




Israel smells blood in the water.
All that Persian kowtowing and Iranian begging and for what?
 

FriedButter

Brigadier
Registered Member
The first time they sell that chip, nobody will buy it anymore because its performance will be discounted vs the risk of cutoff in addition to depreciation.

Another problem is when does the degradation begin. When it gets powered on or as per the post “after leaving a specific geographical area” assuming some sort of internal clock. If it is the latter, then you are already losing performance if it sits in a warehouse or port. For retail consumers, how can they risk buying an TSMC chip related product sitting on the shelf for an undisclosed period of time.
 

RedBaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump to reimpose 'maximum pressure' on Iran, aims to drive oil exports to zero​

  • Summary
  • Move brings back tough US policy on Iran from Trump's first term
  • Trump to hold talks with Israeli PM Netanyahu on Tuesday
  • Campaign 'aimed at driving Iran's oil exports to zero'




Iran should have struck Israel when it had the chance, especially since the US is pulling back from Europe and West Pacific now.
Iran has been such a bitter disappointment. All bark & no bite.
 
Top