Last edited:
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Israel is modern state created from ground up. and they have more control over who is Israeli and this give them greater value of each of the person. Putin speak against these people than let them go with all money (official not businessmen). the word financed.
Russia has that Soviet mixture and communist legacy to shade. Putin has been too long in power so he knows things need to be separated and some disposed off. It is Putin way of fighting this conflict that give opportunity to Ukrainian and some become like Boris Nemtsov. Putin understand New Europe. to reach to that understanding country need to be real wealthy and technically advanced.
This Akhmet PMC commander become honorary professor at Kursk university. so obviously this PMC is fighting in Kursk. think disposing and separation by non regional force.
Russia is giving them opportunity to moblize to last ukranian all the way to Canada. If Ukranians have belief they can win this conflict they will mobilize. This Russia strategy contributing to New Europe. see this boy in green drinking clean water from a street fountain and Mosque on mountain top. A country has to give more than just basics to create that new elite.
bajingan
Senior Member
All govt employees should be banned from driving teslas or other western cars would be a good start. With modern softwares it's so easy for those cars to be compromised
I mean, r they actively investigating? If theres like "turncoats" like those in Russia recently?
And every American dying or incompetent promoted is MSS hit job
Stop being a tool buying PMC tier US nationalist copium
Last edited:
US tried that with Vietnam and the result was losing a ton of planes then being unable to sustain the war.
Russia actually wants a lot of Ukrainians, just not anyone who doesn't resist Maidan, they're removing those but letting the remainder stay. Notice how Zelensky approval (even by western admission, which I'll use since there's no impartial sources with access) now approach single digits. That's mostly not because of changing minds but because people are just gone, fled or killed.
The numbers sit at like 40k-60k, they would have taken that town already if they had killed half of the inhabitants lmao
Showing why it's important to have a large industrial capability like Russia or US in their wars.
the difference is, when Ukraine loses on the field, Russia gains population from captured territories and POWs. Russia already gained 5 million population from the war: ,
.
Russians and west both just don't make a big deal out of it for different reasons. , etc.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
More emotions and lack of concentration on the main body of the war. He gets it on the battlefield; that is where the efforts are concentrated. If you win this, you don't need anything else. If you lose this, nothing else will help. Everything about handing "death sentences" to "criminals" is just an emotion while war and territorial conquest is cold hard business.
What does that mean? Nothing that supports your argument. Russians take away Ukraine's ability to kill by literally killing off significant portions of their male population and causing another significant portion to flee. Ukraine does what? Assassinate a Russian general who's replaced so fast, it's an automatic function of the chain of command.
Many many Ukrainian nobodys, often those who get arrested or killed without any fanfare because they were just nobodies caught up in a war.
I see the risk-to-reward concept flew way over your head. Also, I had already asked before, who are these "masterminds" that you claim exist? They look like just a function of the Ukrainian military unless you have some evidence.
Hold on, you read this paragraph and that's all you were able to get out of it?
"Russia kills them on the battlefield and it's fine with the ones that are failing and not on the battlefield. There is no individual who is a bane to Russia, producing force multipliers on the battlefield while safe in a Ukrainian city. Ukraine has no commanders of such worth and basically no scientists who produce anything at all. Sending assassins comes with risks; you don't need to take that risk if you're confident in combat. The risk-to-reward has to make sense for assassination attempts. Ukrainians risked a nobody to plant a bomb; if he were sniped in the head on the way over, nobody would care. His target was a Russian general would would be the highest profile target Ukraine ever aimed for. Risk-to-Reward makes sense. If Russia sends someone, they are risking a professionally trained agent from the Spetznaz or FSB with intelligence and operational value everywhere; his target would be some useless loudmouth beggar daydreaming about invading China while getting invaded by Russia. Risk-to-Reward, totally opposite of what it needs to be. Your assassination of leaders is just an emotional reaction which is an unneeded risk and endeavour in a situation of battlefield victory and in an enemy environment that is extremely poor in valuable/meaningful targets."
If that's what you concluded, then it is over for you and we've maxed out your intellectual capability at the risk-to-reward concept.
Last edited: