proelite
Senior Member
The 0 value in the FT is likely a definitional change and/or some regulatory evasion but the general directionality: an atrocious sentiment and business environment that has frozen equity investment in high-risk innovative businesses
In many people's opinion, this would be called a smart diversion of resources to more productive forces. If something turns out to be a money printer elsewhere China can simply copy the idea domestically and beat the other company to global expansion.
Chinese startups getting locked out of the 90% of the world that is not China is quite bad for them, as would be the deleterious effect of downstream firms that use Chinese startup inputs to improve business practices since they would have to
1) buy foreign and when Chinese startups get there, reconfigure their business, at substantial cost, to support local protectionism or
2) go without new innovation and run less efficient businesses or
3) wait for Chinese startups to develop (but if they have local protectionism - startups will have no incentive to innovate); and thus have more inefficient business practices
The US is 90% of the world? what?