Miscellaneous News

Santamaria said:

This is one of the best post I have ever read in this forum. Harsh truth after harsh truth.

I would also add how all muslims states (even IRAN wtf?) only some days ago joined US, UK and European State in an absurd statement about "Srebenika genocide".

Once get to think what kind of dust have in their minds all those leaders of the Arabs and Muslim countries joining the West in that joke.

In only one week in Gaza died 4 times more Palestinians than in Sberenica even trusting NATO numbers (that are obviously made up). Add that deaths in Iraq, Lybia, Afganistan, etc etc etc.

But best thing those idiots can do is join the West in condemning tiny Serbia playing along the West to divide the Global South.

Amazing

Click to expand...

Exactly. You've just described what the Muslim Brotherhood does. Led by Turkey and Qatar, the MB is not really aligned with any anti-imperialist struggle. They would complain everytime they see Muslims victimized, without checking the context. While the MB demands for better treatment towards Muslims globally, they do not show the same compassion at all for the non-Muslims. So while they are opposed to the Zionists, they are no saints themselves.

Sometimes they've got things right, like with condemning the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts and the second Iraq War. But way too often, they're on the wrong side. Such as condemning the "Sebrenica massacre", supporting ETIM, supporting the Chechen Jihadists, and fighting against the Syrian government. Oftentimes, they enthusiastically went along with Western agenda, as long as it furthers their own extremist agenda.

Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is busy condemning Israel, but have not violently opposed Israel. In the past, when the MB condemns somebody, they'll send their Mujahideen to fight. They do this against Russia, China, and Syria. But when it comes to Israel, it's just lip service. This sums up who the Muslim Brotherhood truly are.

Cross posted from EV thread:

Biggest news of May just came lol

Qin L DMI and Seal 06 DMI 80km base version for just 9.98w (!!!)

Game breaking price. This is an almost Camry size car with world leading technology and fuel consumption, selling cheaper than a Corolla.



Funnily the price was leaked earlier in the day and a ton of people were saying they would eat the car if it was really 9.98w

Click to expand...

Chevalier said:

I've been rewatching the Sopranos and it struck me that the Anglo Zionists projected a lot of their own crimes and sins onto the italian mafia. THat's why the FBI only went after the italian mafia but seemed to ignore the jewish mafia which had already infiltrated the USG.

Click to expand...

The most quintessentially American characteristic is to forge a sense of a shared identity by projecting all of their sins and character flaws onto a new minority to all gang up on.

It happened with the Irish and Italians. They then got their white card stamped so they got to join the gang in discriminating against Arabs and Asians.

Now the Americans are trying to sub divide Asians into good Asians and Chinese, but that is hampered by the claim that all Asians look the same to them. Hence why when Asians suffer racist abuse in American pop culture, the ‘correct’ response is for the ‘good Asians’ is to reply with their nationality.

But it’s interested to note however, they never seem to have any difficulty in singling out Asians who commit any crime for specially harsh punishment. So if their racism is so sophisticated as to be context specific, I guess there is hope that one day the Anglos will be able to train their thugs to be able to tell Japanese and Koreans and Chinese apart to limit racist collateral damage against their government approved Asians.

Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc.’s iPhone staged a rebound in China last month with shipments rising 52% amid a flurry of discounts from retail partners.

Requiring Apple to use Chinese components should be a retaliation option against US tariffs & sanctions. If Apple responds by pulling out of China, all the better & it shows their attitude.

"Let's not just attempt to jam-pack China's doorstep with missiles, warships and warplanes - But now, we're gonna have those missiles tipped with tactical nukes! What could possibly go wrong?"

Time To Deploy Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons at Sea

Click to expand...

TBH, the more the China-hawk Blobs in DC came up with stunts like this, the more I seriously hope that a certain shipyard in Huludao would be working 24/7 to pump out as many "Big Black Fish" as quick as possible.

Given that we're already seeing certain Chinese naval institutes working on VPT-like multipack VLS tubes for submarines right now and submarine-launched long-range strike missiles - It wouldn't be difficult for China to have her own Ohio-conversion SSGNs and Block 5 Virginia SS(G)Ns sometime in the not-so-distant future.

In fact, those multipack-VLS tubes should be capable of launching land-attack/anti-ship ballistic/hypersonic missiles (LA/ASh BM/HM) that can reach as far as 1500-2500 kilometers away. And if those submarine-launched missiles can be made longer (the older JL-2 SLBM is ~3 meters longer than the longest possible missile that can fit into the UVLS found on Chinese DDGs, let alone the newer JL-3) - The strike ranges can even be expanded upwards of 3000 kilometers.

In fact, here's what a 2500-kilometer strike radius looks like in the EastPac:


Besides, given how SSNs are growing in size as they got more advanced and more capable - We may be reaching a point sometime in the future where it would be more cost-effective and effort-effective for SSNs and SSBNs to share a largely similar hull design. And given that the multipack VLS tubes have pretty much similar dimensions as a typical SLBM - Any SSBNs can have their role swapped between that of the SSBN and the SSGN by simply swapping the SLBMs with multipack VLS tubes (and vice versa), instead of having to go through a lengthy SSGN-conversion process like the first 4 Ohio boats did.

In fact, China won't even need to have a Cuba Missile Crisis 2.0 of her own (and unlike the US, China has neither the need nor justification to find her own sacrificial lambs in the Murican backyard). The PLAN could then have these SSGN armed with LA/ASh BM/HMs conduct regular patrols in the Eastern Pacific, which can actually provide similar value of conventional deterrence and warfighting capability as those Typhon MRC systems through the capability of threatening strikes against Hawaii, Alaska and the western CONUS (just like hot the Typhon threatens the eastern and southern seaboard of the Chinese homeland) - All without not requiring the political and financial minefields of having to establish and maintain these weapon systems and the manpower that operates them on foreign soil.

These LA/ASh BM/HMs should also be equipped with the capability for its conventional warheads to be swapped with nuclear warheads for countervalue strikes against US&LC targets in the Pacific and western CONUS, in case the US thinks that it is funny to have a go tactical with their nuclear arsenal again like during the 1st Cold War.

The point being - If the China-hawk Blobs in DC believes that they can shoehorn China into a corner without the need to expect payback, then Beijing should make them rethink again.

Two can play that game, after all.

ACuriousPLAFan said:

"Let's not just attempt to jam-pack China's doorstep with missiles, warships and warplanes - But now, we're gonna have those missiles tipped with tactical nukes! What could possibly go wrong?"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

TBH, the more the China-hawk Blobs in DC came up with stunts like this, the more I seriously hope that a certain shipyard in Huludao would be working 24/7 to pump out as many "Big Black Fish" as quick as possible.

Given that we're already seeing certain Chinese naval institutes working on VPT-like multipack VLS tubes for submarines right now and submarine-launched long-range strike missiles - It wouldn't be difficult for China to have her own Ohio-conversion SSGNs and Block 5 Virginia SS(G)Ns sometime in the not-so-distant future. In fact, those multipack-VLS tubes will be capable of launching land-attack/anti-ship ballistic/hypersonic missiles (LA/ASh BM/HM) that can reach as far as 1500-2500 kilometers away.

And if those submarine-launched missiles can be made longer (the older JL-2 SLBM is ~3 meters longer than the longest possible missile that can fit into the UVLS found on Chinese DDGs, let alone the newer JL-3) - The strike ranges can even be expanded upwards of 3000 kilometers.

In fact, here's what a 2500-kilometer strike radius looks like in the EastPac:
View attachment 130215

Besides, given how SSNs are growing in size as they got more advanced and more capable - We may be reaching a point sometime in the future where it would be more cost-effective and effort-effective for SSNs and SSBNs to share a largely similar hull design. And given that the multipack VLS tubes have pretty much similar dimensions as a typical SLBM - Any SSBNs can have their role swapped between that of the SSBN and the SSGN by simply swapping the SLBMs with multipack VLS tubes (and vice versa), instead of having to go through a lengthy SSGN-conversion process like the first 4 Ohio boats did.

In fact, China won't even need to have a Cuba Missile Crisis 2.0 of her own (and unlike the US, China has neither the need nor justification to find her own sacrificial lambs in the Murican backyard). The PLAN could then have these SSGN armed with LA/ASh BM/HMs conduct regular patrols in the Eastern Pacific, which can actually provide similar value of conventional deterrence and warfighting capability as those Typhon MRC systems through the capability of threatening strikes against Hawaii, Alaska and the western CONUS (just like hot the Typhon threatens the eastern and southern seaboard of the Chinese homeland) - All without not requiring the political and financial minefields of having to establish and maintain these weapon systems and the manpower that operates them on foreign soil.

These LA/ASh BM/HMs should also be equipped with the capability for its conventional warheads to be swapped with nuclear warheads for countervalue strikes against US&LC targets in the Pacific and western CONUS, in case the US thinks that it is funny to have a go tactical with their nuclear arsenal again like during the 1st Cold War.

The point being - If the China-hawk Blobs in DC believes that they can shoehorn China into a corner without the need to expect payback, then Beijing should make them rethink again.

Two can play that game, after all.

Click to expand...

Like I said before, is this lack of respect by these stooges that is making China accelerate their nuclear programs even collaborating with Russia and one day under Western pressure China will build nuclear weapons at an industrial scale, at a cheaper price than Western powers can afford. For every nuke they will point to China they will have two pointed at them.

ACuriousPLAFan said:

"Let's not just attempt to jam-pack China's doorstep with missiles, warships and warplanes - But now, we're gonna have those missiles tipped with tactical nukes! What could possibly go wrong?"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Click to expand...

A Canadian advocating for this lunacy? They ought to just stick to what they do best, and that's "peacekeeping"

Imagine believing nuking Chinese territory from forward deployed war ships is any different from using land based nukes. A different option here is just to build more strategic weapons at different yield levels and make it clear any use of nuclear weapons whether ship based or otherwise will invite strategic retaliation at 10x the yield.