Channel 4 news released a documentary talking about Chinese spies in the UK:
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
You’re witnessing the Indian infiltration of western nations as they did with the UK and Anglo firms like cisco and Oracle.
The problem is democracy allows corruption to go unpunished. You don’t have Jewish and Indian interest groups with their tentacles inside China because the CPC comes down hard on corruption. Even Singapore which has strong anti corruption culture has been infected with Indian nepotism because of its democratic government.
Democracies are promoted by the Anglo west because it allows their Zionist masters to better control and corrupt the target nation‘s elites. The Indians are doing what they did in the corporate west and mimicking the Hebrew LARPers to advance their own people.
im actually worried that the new visa rules China has with certain European countries will result in illegal immigration from Europe stealing Chinese jobs and opportunities from local Chinese. As europe descends further into their Anglo dug hole re Russia and recession, more Europeans will be trying to immigrate to China and not just bto cause of white privileg in Asia as you’re seeing with the neckbeards in Japan and the paedophiles in Thailand and the Philippines.
But, like you said, since China isn't run under a western based democracy system, if the need to execute a policy that would correct the issue you raised (Foreigners "stealing" jobs) will be quickly remedied since the people of China will demand action from their government.
Milei is an idiot. He is just going to do another re-run of the Yeltsin years in Russia if he pursues his policies. It will lead to mass unemployment, people getting destitute, and civil unrest. Argentina already tried doing shock therapy when Menem was President of Argentina in the 1980-90s.
supercat
Colonel
I don't think China has any illusion over the Taiwan issue, even without such Freudian slips from Western politicians.
New "at what cost" just dropped.
The Economist:
The same Economist:
Want some good laugh? Just glance over the titles of the articles. No need to waste your time by actually reading the the articles. They don't even know the size of the Russian Army: more than 1.32 million active and 2 million in reserve.
New "at what cost" just dropped.
The Economist:
The same Economist:
Want some good laugh? Just glance over the titles of the articles. No need to waste your time by actually reading the the articles. They don't even know the size of the Russian Army: more than 1.32 million active and 2 million in reserve.
Putin is just trying to keep the legacy of the man who put him in power in the first place. But Yeltsin's government's catastrophic governance only started to improve after Primakov was made Prime Minister.
By comparing what happened with the Russian and Chinese economies it is pretty easy to tell that shock therapy is basically a disaster. The Chinese economy started out from a much lower baseline yet did more gradual and limited in scope changes to the economy which simply worked better. Processes need to be more gradual and the state should always retain the commanding heights of the economy and natural monopolies. This is basically the same mixed market economy which the Western countries used in the post war period to great success.
Claimed "successes" of shock therapy like Poland after the Cold War happened because of several factors. The West forgave Poland's debt, and they got massive cash infusions both before and after they joined the European Union. But even then a lot of the population emigrated and much of the industrial sector collapsed.
By comparing what happened with the Russian and Chinese economies it is pretty easy to tell that shock therapy is basically a disaster. The Chinese economy started out from a much lower baseline yet did more gradual and limited in scope changes to the economy which simply worked better. Processes need to be more gradual and the state should always retain the commanding heights of the economy and natural monopolies. This is basically the same mixed market economy which the Western countries used in the post war period to great success.
Claimed "successes" of shock therapy like Poland after the Cold War happened because of several factors. The West forgave Poland's debt, and they got massive cash infusions both before and after they joined the European Union. But even then a lot of the population emigrated and much of the industrial sector collapsed.
Last edited:
I don't think these are that bad except maybe the "temporary" tax import tax.
All these subsidies, and the value of pesos have been artificially maintained and are 100% not an indicator of the real economy.
With these measures, people will get poorer, but their current lifestyle isn't naturally created by realistic economic conditions anyway. So measures like this can at least alleviate the government's deficit and redirect some funds to more productive sectors. If your country is poor, don't expect big subsidies.
I am lacking the details of his economic program but IMO these enacted policies look ok to me. The most important thing are not these, its the regulations around business environment and trade. Big things need to happen there to fully utilise the domestic capital potential and and also allow big foreign companies to invest there
lol at that previous gov