Why did I not see that? Holy…
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
You can let me run MOFA's twitter account and I can guarantee a scathing roast of America's failings every day. I don't need linguistics or writing training for the shitposts I'm about to drop.
Naah. I've seen enough posts from him to judge that he is arrogant. He always assuming that China is gonna just like that Jai Bharat Superpowah nation or Russia. He wants China to behave itself in this current "rules based international order". He doesn't like China challenging this order, even if it is legitimate. He assumes that the West is always gonna win if China starts to confront them. Pro hint, any nation that bends to Western pressure will automatically lose, and will lose more than they bargained for. Japan, France, Germany, Russia, Libya, Iraq, etc.
He says that China's next leadership is gonna be the doom of China, as if the Chinese are gonna vote a Chinese version of Modi. That for me is ignorance. Then when confronted by other members, he refuses to engage in a proper debate, changes topics, and is wholly unapologetic. He then walks out of a debate and speaks as if he knows more than his challengers. That to me is arrogance.
Last edited:
New Cold War has already started. It is just the cost of decoupling from China is so great that the Western powers don't have the stomach to implement the full scale assaults.
Western powers have tried to portray China is the aggressor for years. Whatever China does or doesn't do won't change this narrative. People buying the Western propaganda would always support the West.
Just look at what happened in Taiwan strait and Philippines for the last few years. There is no accident that the US is trying to provoke and contain China just as it did to the Russia for the NATO eastward expansion.
China fights back, China being portrays as aggressor. China doesn't fight back, the US and its allies would escalate and commit salami slice tactics just as they did to Russia.
At the end of the day, most of the world fall under the US sphere of influence and many people can be easily manipulated. That's why even as the West has been the biggest aggressors for more than a few centuries, people still think positive of the West.
It is not to say China shouldn't engage and support the global south and address some of their concerns. However, China can't be expected to single-handedly fight the Western influence and win the heart and mind of the world when the rest of the world and many the local elites were too embedded with the West.
China isn't going to sacrifice its national interests to appease anyone or being see as a good guy. China might not want to be a superpower or have any interests in toppling any governments but for countries that decided to join the West to contain China then these countries should expect that China would retaliate and fight back. China isn't a hello kitty and people shouldn't expect China being one.
Western powers have tried to portray China is the aggressor for years. Whatever China does or doesn't do won't change this narrative. People buying the Western propaganda would always support the West.
Just look at what happened in Taiwan strait and Philippines for the last few years. There is no accident that the US is trying to provoke and contain China just as it did to the Russia for the NATO eastward expansion.
China fights back, China being portrays as aggressor. China doesn't fight back, the US and its allies would escalate and commit salami slice tactics just as they did to Russia.
At the end of the day, most of the world fall under the US sphere of influence and many people can be easily manipulated. That's why even as the West has been the biggest aggressors for more than a few centuries, people still think positive of the West.
It is not to say China shouldn't engage and support the global south and address some of their concerns. However, China can't be expected to single-handedly fight the Western influence and win the heart and mind of the world when the rest of the world and many the local elites were too embedded with the West.
China isn't going to sacrifice its national interests to appease anyone or being see as a good guy. China might not want to be a superpower or have any interests in toppling any governments but for countries that decided to join the West to contain China then these countries should expect that China would retaliate and fight back. China isn't a hello kitty and people shouldn't expect China being one.
Panda bears may be cute and eat bamboo, but they are still a big bear with claws. But if you don't poke the panda you'll be fine. Poke the panda, fuck around and find out.
I havent studied situation that time but highly likely if China still partnered with USSR it would not have received Western support and ultimately both will have stagnated anyway,
but one thing is clear Gulf Arabs were against Soviet communist party not just because they were communist but they have Turkic inside in power. and that include Afghan of 1980s. when Japanese PM says that Saudi are leader of Islamic world. what does it mean in practical terms?. it means Japan will not do any business in Turkic states or Iran without consulting Gulf Arabs. think about this thing. Even today Gulf Arabs can rolled up entirely of SCO by tweaking some things. and thats reason Russia keep certain distance from Afghan as it can reveal things about Arabs to Turks.
Pro-China front runner Mohamed Muizzu was set to win Saturday’s presidential vote in the Maldives, according to local media tallies, after a campaign dominated by the archipelago’s relationship with traditional benefactor India.
Muizzu was ahead of incumbent Ibrahim Mohamed Solih with 53.92 per cent of the vote and a lead of more than 17,000 ballots.
Muizzu was ahead of incumbent Ibrahim Mohamed Solih with 53.92 per cent of the vote and a lead of more than 17,000 ballots.