Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
The general population buys wholesale into the Chinese = orcs and China = Mordor narrative.

Allow me to remind everyone of this moment.


WTF are they teaching their kids?

China and the west are about to step into the thunderdome of civilizations and only one will leave.
American kids on TV says: "Let's kill all Chinese so that we don't have to pay our debts". They tell us that its only a joke. They tell us that they're just kids. They tell us that we Chinese are overly sensitive.

Imagine if Chinese kids on TV say: "If Americans don't wanna pay their debts, then we should hurt them". They won't see the funny side. They'll scream in outrage that these kids have been brainwashed to hate Americans by the evil "See-see-pee". They'll tell their kind to get tougher on all the Chinese.

Imaging if any kid on TV says: "Lets kill all Jews/Blacks/Indians/Muslims". Would they dare to call that funny?
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
How though would this be achieved?

China would likely use nukes in the event they lost just 21 million Chinese in like 3% of its own territory. Why would US, which is still at the end of the day a near peer to China, not use nukes in response to the loss of over 330 million Americans across 95% of their territory?

I just don't see any realistic route to removing them from mainland USA. At least not through direct military means.

What could you see such a campaign consist of?
You just need to target the establishment (i.e. de-nazify the Five Eyes) and create internal fighting, supporting one group over the other. Internal strife will have them aim their nukes at each other. Divide & conquer - very effective strategy from their own playbook.

Or continue on the current path of no direct interference, focusing solely on the economics; soon they'll run out of money to finance their wars and military, especially with the increasing domestic unrest.

I think option #2 may become unlikely because the US sees this as already happening, hence jumping to initiate war.

While the Europeans are placing trade restrictions on Chinese goods over "Weegur slave labour" They have no problems using Indian slave labour themselves.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


India exports not only labour to Italy, but also Indian labour practices.


The employer must have dumped him back to his Indian agents, and they in turn, just dumped him on the side of the road.



For European standards, this is considered slave labour. But for Indian standards, this is normal.


Building a piece of rural India in Italy.


The main culprits for creating these slave labour conditions are the local Mafia and the Indian labour agencies. But the Italian employers are not innocent too. Willing buyer, willing seller.

Just like what the West did to Chinese goods. Perhaps China could create a certification body to investigate Western goods for slave labour. The results might actually be quite shocking.
This is actually a sad reality of agriculture in many Western countries. Italy has a large Indian slave labor workforce employed in agriculture. Canada has ~40% and USA ~70% of agricultural workforce composed of slaves from Mexico and Central America who come here seasonally, working well below safety standards and minimum wage. Nobody wants to talk about it or fix the issue because the truth is: if it wasn't for this slave labor, the $2 loaf of bread in the supermarket would cost $9.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
People forget that all the West's grand plans to take on China costs money. Americans act like money grows on trees for them and yet they complain about trade imbalances with other countries. If they don't need China, they can decouple like they threatened. They don't because as embarrassing as it is for them, they need China to make money for them to feed their gluttonous lifestyles.

The West wants to emphasize to the world about how much being liked (by them) is most important. The West tries to point out all these new alliances against China yet all of them are with countries that are already allied by treaty. Why this ruse? Because what's old is tiring. They've been at it this long and it hasn't turned out like they said it was going to be. Making something out to be like it's fresh and new gives it more immediacy. They said that China was going to invade Taiwan when the US was preoccupied with Iraq and Afghanistan. Both wars are over and yet no invasion. Now they say China wants to invade Taiwan to steal it's semiconductor secrets. That wasn't important before? Before the Cold War, they hated China because Chinese weren't white. Today they hate China for human rights violations on people they hated before because they ain't white. And all this is a cover because they just want to destroy China because the Chinese ain't white. The oldest reason for why for the West.
 

Chish

Junior Member
Registered Member
What i found odd is that the secret service didn't deploy any type of shield after trump was shot and had to move him. Even an large simple umbrella would of at least shielded some line of sight to Trump's head if there was another shooter somewhere. I think they had brief case that deployed as a shield in Abe's case.
Trump not following security procedures, so Secret Service had to use their bodies as shields and were keeping their heads down but Trump keep popping up his head!!
 

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lol pretty much the only anti-China thing I found from this guy is this bill with another congressman:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And a bit of other mild trade related whining. Could've definitely been worse I think. At least he didn't pick that contemptible rat Little Marco.

Seems not very hostile. Could be trained into a 建国 2.0 with time, potentially?
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member

"proud to be a hindu"
"From Slumdog Millionaire poverty porn to a display of Hinduism, it's a welcome break."

Is Indian Twitter only filled with the upper class or are Indians just that docile?

Lol pretty much the only anti-China thing I found from this guy is this bill with another congressman:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And a bit of other mild trade related whining. Could've definitely been worse I think. At least he didn't pick that contemptible rat Little Marco.

Seems not very hostile. Could be trained into a 建国 2.0 with time, potentially?

JD Vance is married to an openly Hindu Indian woman, and they were introduced by Amy Chua. Yes that Amy Chua.

Make of that what you will.
 
Top