Miscellaneous News

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member
At least the Italians and other europeans are more logical. They are okay with Chinese cars as long as they setup local factories, unlike the US whom either total ban or seize.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This is a good move on Italy's part. Given the success of MG branded cars globally, those historical brands may help auto makers like Chery, Changan or GW penetrate local markets. Italy also enjoys some logistics advantages over other EU countries in shipping. The main variable would be local production costs. In Italy for EU, not a bad option ...


 
Last edited:

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is a good move on Italy's part. Given the success of MG branded cars globally, those historical brands may help auto makers like Chery, Changan or GW penetrate local markets. Italy also enjoys some logistics advantages over other EU countries in shipping. The main variable would be local production costs. In Italy for EU, not a bad option ...

Maserati and Alfa Romeo seems promising. ;)
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member

I think it’s funny how the Anglo Americans are forcing all European companies to move their factories into the continental US because they want America to be the new China, except that Anglo Americans are not Chinese people with a millennia of learning and genetic memory but are rather, the product of settler colonists and pirates are are therefore ill suited to manufacturing and innovation. We must remember that the UK had to force their products into the rest of the world by gunboat diplomacy, the British empire was a captive market for evidently inferior British craftsmanship, in fact, look to the modern debacle of forcing semiconductor factories into arizona. It’s obvious the Anglo plan is to make Taiwanese TSMC build and set up and train Americans so that Intel and the USG can just pull an India and steal the factory or force its sale for nil.

Not a bad idea, really. Since the first industrial revolution, Germany, Russia, US, Japan, Korea, ... I think that is the way it is supposed to be in local industrialization or re-industrialization.
not necessarily gonna work. White people hate having to take instruction from asians, especially when it’s a field where white Europeans used to dominate. They’ll definitely steal the tech and know how as they stole silk production and ceramic technology, but will try to pass it off as their own and force their histories to make white Europeans as the original innovators. This, even as they are struggling with 5G and China is now testing 6G.

secondly. How are the Anglo led westerners gonna do this when they are harassing Chinese phd students and trying to get them to learn lgbtq bs subjects at uni because Chinese learning science triggers them like the fragile Neanderthal sub 70 IQ barbarians they really are? where the machine gun obliterated Millenia old steppe nomad threat, I can only imagine the weapon used that will obliterate Anglo European predation.
 
Last edited:

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member

I think it’s funny how the Anglo Americans are forcing all European companies to move their factories into the continental US because they want America to be the new China, except that Anglo Americans are not Chinese people with a millennia of learning and genetic memory but are rather, the product of settler colonists and pirates are are therefore ill suited to manufacturing and innovation. We must remember that the UK had to force their products into the rest of the world by gunboat diplomacy, the British empire was a captive market for evidently inferior British craftsmanship, in fact, look to the modern debacle of forcing semiconductor factories into arizona. It’s obvious the Anglo plan is to make Taiwanese TSMC build and set up and train Americans so that Intel and the USG can just pull an India and steal the factory or force its sale for nil.
That is a given BUT the Taiwanese are also very clever, I don't know it's intentional or not by delaying the FAB opening in 2026 and mass production of 5nm chip by 2027, the US will be a generation behind the Chinese when they introduced their 3nm in late 2026, While TSMC will introduced its 2nm node process, 2 generation ahead.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
The EU are now talking about seizing Chinese owned assets, using the ostensible excuse that it might be used to fund Russia. In my opinion, since they are openly discussing it, It is no longer a matter of whether they will do it now, but a matter of when.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
What about EU investment in China? surely its 100 times bigger than what the Chinese had invested.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
The EU are now talking about seizing Chinese owned assets, using the ostensible excuse that it might be used to fund Russia. In my opinion, since they are openly discussing it, It is no longer a matter of whether they will do it now, but a matter of when.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Say goodby to European standards of living. I look forward to many European prostitutes akin to the many Russian prostitutes of the 90s.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and again, what is swedens problem? Why is it that Norway and Denmark don’t appear to go out of their way to start trouble with China and yet Sweden does?
 
Top