Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Now we know why they were silence on the whole Biden debacle.

It was because of NATO. Now the wolves are out and Biden is practically finished.

Playbook: What Obama and Pelosi are doing about Biden​

Pelosi has advised those members, however, to wait until this week’s NATO Summit is finished out of respect for Biden and national security writ large

In fact, she’s advised some Democrats in swing districts to do whatever they have to do to secure their own reelections — even if it means asking Biden to relinquish his place atop the ticket.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Scoop: Schumer open to dumping Biden in 2024​

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is privately signaling to donors that he's open to a Democratic presidential ticket that isn't led by President Biden, Axios has learned.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Morning Joe’ co-host Mika Brzezinski accuses Obama of being behind Clooney op-ed, claims his presidency wasn’t ‘historic’ like Biden’s​

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski claimed on Thursday that former President Barack Obama was behind George Clooney’s New York Times op-ed demanding that President Biden not seek re-election.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Obama knew in advance of George Clooney’s bombshell call for Biden to drop out — but didn’t object​

Former President Barack Obama was given a heads-up but didn’t object to Oscar-winning actor George Clooney’s bombshell call for President Biden to drop out of the 2024 race, a new report says.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer says ‘it wouldn’t hurt’ for Biden to take cognitive test​

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said Wednesday “it wouldn’t hurt” for President Joe Biden to take a cognitive test, a move that could quell mounting concerns over his mental fitness following a poor debate performance in June.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
horse

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
If the anglos are so committed to an anti China crusade, why don’t they throw down the gauntlet and let their own sons and daughters lead the way. A merchant slaver pirate nation like the five eyes lacks the cojones to pull off a Ghengis khan, and judging by chinas production of carriers, I sure hope conquest of the lands of the five eyes are on the cards. It’ll have to be like the Han campaign against eh Xiongnu, a multi decade intergenerational project to eradicate Anglo domination of the North American and Australian continents.
Click to expand...


I think this is all idle talk.

The truth remains from the day the Berlin Wall fell, that NATO had no purpose anymore.

A few decades later, NATO is still looking for a purpose.

Oddly, this war in Europe gave NATO a purpose, supposedly.

Does not look like it will pan out that way.
 
I

Index

Junior Member
Registered Member
Chevalier said:
If the anglos are so committed to an anti China crusade, why don’t they throw down the gauntlet and let their own sons and daughters lead the way. A merchant slaver pirate nation like the five eyes lacks the cojones to pull off a Ghengis khan, and judging by chinas production of carriers, I sure hope conquest of the lands of the five eyes are on the cards. It’ll have to be like the Han campaign against eh Xiongnu, a multi decade intergenerational project to eradicate Anglo domination of the North American and Australian continents.
Click to expand...
We can't get the North American continent anymore probably due to nukes. It's also not really needed.

China should focus on containing US to North America. Even if we can't do to the new Axis what Stalin did to the old Axis, we can still demilitarize them from military aged population. Create multiple proxy war fronts or even direct war if that's needed.

Not going after mainland US, but rather baiting US to throw human wave after wave until they lost all offensive capability, then after that China can hold the Pacific, while keeping the amerinazi imprisoned on mainland USA. They'll then destroy eachother among themselves for what scraps of power are left there.

The valuable parts of the former European Imperial powers are actually the colonies. It's those which China should exercise economic and military conquest over. While leaving the former colonizers imprisoned in their own homeland, where China will control the inflow of food, civilian goods and infrastructure needed to sustain modern life. Austerity will then be measured out as needed to former nazist or imperialist powers, depending on how civilized their conduct is.
 
P

pmc

Major
Registered Member
AssassinsMace said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is an odd story I saw this morning on cable news. My brain feels like exploding trying to figure out what these two authors are trying to say. They're peddling a book they wrote about how back during the Obama Administration, the Pentagon decided to partner with Silicon Valley and formed "Unit X" to create technologies of the future and they claim the results are being seen in Ukraine today. For some weird reason, they're citing enemy tactics from Ukraine to Israel to the Red Sea as examples of how the battlefield has changed. The US side isn't the one that's victorious there. Are they trying to claim the technology used comes from "Unit X'? All the conflict zones where they claim "Unit X" technology is being used are examples where their side is failing. Where's the scandal that all this new advanced US technology is falling into the hands of the enemy? They're trying to blame China for somehow getting into the supply chain of Boeing blaming them for the bad quality airliners being produced there. But no word here...?

Not sure why one of the authors cites riding in an F-16 over the Iraq/ Iranian border didn't have a map so he didn't know which country he was flying over and then mentions something that cost a $100. Is this an example of this amazing technology of what...? Then one of them mentions commercial technology. They brought up drone warfare and how M1 tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine. DJI drone technology has been at the forefront of drones being used for these purposes. Are they claiming DJI is using "Unit X" technology?

It's suspicious. Nothing makes sense. When the authors talk in the interview, they don't sound natural. The entire piece seems scripted with bad actors playing the roles. Is this really for dumb Americans to see to say how the Pentagon and the US are doing a great job so Americans shouldn't use their votes to change anything? Naturally Americans are going to assume that these "battlefield changing technologies" came from the US because why else would they try to take credit for victories by the enemy against their own side?
Click to expand...
It make sense if you have read about Syria. this type of explosive small size drone swarm done started from there. it was written that that was beyond the ability of commercial drones at the time. Russia influenced by those events in many ways that have delayed development of so many of its platforms and systems.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1720727210096.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top