What helps me to clear biases is to play a role reversal game. Say if I think the US is doing something unreasonable, I just try to think what if China did the same, or vice versa.
For this particular instance, one should ask that until the industrial revolution, what did the rest of the world invent that's on the magnitude of gunpowder, paper, etc.? The Europeans were the first to industrialize, and that seems to make some think that not only will they be the first to everything from that point onward, but they were primed to be the first to everything from the beginning of human history. Rather unsound logic, I'd say.
To me the answer to why the Europeans industrialized first is rather simple. It's competition. China had no need to do so, it's been the pre-eminent power in its part of the world for millenia. When China was in prolonged period of chaos, plenty of inventions were made. Europe was in perpetual competition between its various nations, and that created the impetus to evolve. Necessity is the mother of all inventions, isn't it?
China saw the need to modernize 100 years or so ago, and it's now the preminent industrial power in the world. In many metrics it's also the preminent scientific power already, but that'll become more obvious within the next 10-20 years IMO. The competitive impetus is there, and the resources are getting there as well. If China does get to the top though, the competitive impetus will diminish, and that'll likely be when the fall of the current iteration of China will begin.