I always felt Modi was doing the elites bidding. He's very good at getting the 1% their wealth by screwing over everyone else.
But that's the point. If you teach that finding citations about your views is all that's needed then as long as enough people reject reality, then you have a sound basis for it. How do you know what's real? If a citation says the economy is doing good but I see it doing bad then the citations are right and you should reject the unreliable personal evidence of your eyes. If China is doing well and citations say it isn't then it just means everything bad is hidden because citations from Harvard say so.That's not the problem.
The point of that writing style is to persuade or convince of a point, and the whole point of citations is so that it's not just based on unverifiable personal observations.
In itself I don't see that as a problem. That's the whole point of academic writing: provide proof to support one's assertions. The problem is when confronted with evidence that conflicts with their preconceived notions they don't re-adjust their views to match the evidence and instead choose to reject the evidence.
Case in point:
1. Assumption: "Asians can't innovate"
2. When confronted with evidence of innovation:
Rather than go "Oh, we were wrong. They innovated", they go "They must have copied because we know they can't innovate."
That is the problem. It is the refusal to adjust views to fit reality, and instead a rejection of reality.
Somewhere in India. Warning, another explicit content of the undesirable type.
The way the world is going. We really do need a puke emoji.
Or they'll just move the goalpost and hope you don't notice.That's not the problem.
The point of that writing style is to persuade or convince of a point, and the whole point of citations is so that it's not just based on unverifiable personal observations.
In itself I don't see that as a problem. That's the whole point of academic writing: provide proof to support one's assertions. The problem is when confronted with evidence that conflicts with their preconceived notions they don't re-adjust their views to match the evidence and instead choose to reject the evidence.
Case in point:
1. Assumption: "Asians can't innovate"
2. When confronted with evidence of innovation:
Rather than go "Oh, we were wrong. They innovated", they go "They must have copied because we know they can't innovate."
That is the problem. It is the refusal to adjust views to fit reality, and instead a rejection of reality.
But that's the point. If you teach that finding citations about your views is all that's needed then as long as enough people reject reality, then you have a sound basis for it. How do you know what's real? If a citation says the economy is doing good but I see it doing bad then the citations are right and you should reject the unreliable personal evidence of your eyes. If China is doing well and citations say it isn't then it just means everything bad is hidden because citations from Harvard say so.
This is not what's taught in Chinese. 议论文 is only 1 aspect. Out of the 4 main styleof writing, also including 记叙文 (narrative), 散文(descriptor) and 说明文 (instructions), Chinese teaches much more about writing narratives and descriptors about own observations.
Most SAT essay problems are about convincing someone else of a viewpoint. but Gaokao essays are often about personal experiences.
People are taught to think in different ways, don't be surprised when they keep thinking that way.
NK has small economy. Russia can easily hire all its population at multiple of its salaries. but based on Arabic news coverage this visit has some thing to do with making NK less belligerent so it does not mess with SKorea and Japan. Gulf Arabs have success fully integrated South Korea and Japan where there weak currencies provide product and services according to Gulf Arab requirements. Putin gave Kim Aurus auto (Arab funded), dagger (famous in Arab world) and was escorted by Lexus V8 SUVs which are common in Mideast. Arab wealth and importance will keep increasing in this divided world.Russia may want to step up its economic relationship with NK, but even the Russian economy needs China to stay as strong as it is. China is the economic bedrock for both nations. Both cannot do well without China in the picture.
when i said integration of SKorea and Japan with Gulf Emirates i didnot mean just for economic reasons. there is that Gulf Arab support for the right beyond Trump.July 3, 2024 2:39 PM
Ilham Aliyev: Azerbaijan is determined to expand the infrastructure of the North-South International Transport Corridor on its territory
Tesla sales down quarter after quarter. People are switching to hybrids instead of pure EVs. Tesla is in no position to execute expansion plans.