Miscellaneous News

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
E tu Yang?


Well, many people’s worst fears were realized on Thursday, as President Biden had the most dismal and depressing performance in the history of presidential debates.

I had seen President Biden live in February. He did not look good. He was old and shuffling, his skin translucent. His delivery of remarks was uneven and performative – when he says something that is supposed to have emotion behind it but it seems like an old guy reading lines instead of genuine sentiment.

Still, I figured that his team had figured out a regimen to make him seem pumped up and energetic for 90 minutes – they seemed to have it pretty well managed for the State of the Union. I thought if they give him a week of rest and preparation Joe would probably be able to channel some of his vigor from his many debates of 2020, and he’d be genuinely fired up to debate Trump.

I was wrong. It was a doddering disaster.

One thing that was always in the back of my mind - a debate is a LOT harder than giving a speech off of a teleprompter. You have to have command of the material and some messages memorized. You have to project energy in response to your opponent and in some cases the moderators. Let’s say I had you memorize a 60-second message to camera. You’d have to be able to bust that out on command after 80 minutes of back and forth. It’s a lot of cognitive loading.

If someone asked me to give a good speech off of a teleprompter, I could do that with almost no notice. If someone asked me to do a great job at a televised debate it would take some runway. This was a much higher hurdle to clear than the State of the Union, and Joe Biden essentially faceplanted on the first lap.

So what happens now?

I’m clearly in the camp that Joe Biden should step aside and let the Democrats nominate someone else. A ticket of well-liked governors would be a much tougher foil for Trump than Joe and Kamala at this point. I got the hashtag #swapJoeout trending at one point.

The New York Times, the Atlantic, and even CNN have all piled on to make the same case. It’s been a remarkable shift. It’s tough to imagine a successful Democratic campaign that has lost the media to this degree.

But the Biden camp is digging in. The flagship Democrats – Obama, Harris, Newsom, Clyburn, Jeffries, Schumer – are circling the wagons, at least publicly. Donors are being managed and told to stay steady. Biden is campaigning away to try to demonstrate vitality. They have internalized the lesson – that has been true in the past – that if you hunker down you can weather any storm. Each passing day gives them more distance from the debate.

Still, behind the scenes some of the other candidates-in-waiting are staffing up and preparing.

Most debates don’t change a race fundamentally. This one is an exception – Americans saw firsthand that the President isn’t up to the job. He is running an unwinnable race. He is making the case that he is running to defend democracy, but then clinging to the office.

Joe Biden’s superpower has been that he’s a good man who will do right by the country. He is doing wrong by the country now. The question is whether anyone around him will have the courage and moral clarity to save him, and the rest of us, from himself.

If the debate made you wish for a new party in American politics, check out Forward – we are growing every day and got a lot of new recruits this week.

Andrew Yang
Co-Chair, Forward Party
 

Randomuser

Junior Member
Registered Member
I watched some of the videos from that link, and I don't think there's any major issue with Xi Jinping's pronunciation. If the education level of all Chinese people were to be judged by whether their pronunciation is perfectly standard, the vast majority of Chinese would be considered illiterate.
Anyone who has received higher education should realize that one's pronunciation should not be used to assess their level of education. The teacher who taught me the Computer Networks course during my undergraduate studies was from Kazakhstan. And to be honest, her English pronunciation was extremely poor. However, this does not change the fact that she was an excellent scholar, and indeed, I learned a lot from her
Yeah but that requires a deep knowledge of a field which most people don't have. Therefore they need to rely on superficial shallow methods to assess someone.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
In the same vein as above, we do lose muscle mass relative to how much we exercise with every weight loss method known to mankind, that's just how our body works. It doesn't matter if it makes sense to you or not.
No, it doesn't. Elevated HGH in fasting (diminished insulin) conserves muscle mass.

It's okay if you don't know, but don't think you can get away with peddling misinformation, ignoring well-understood concepts even as they're laid bare in front of you.

Might I reiterate again the nonsense you posted? >> "excess calories are stored as fat; in caloric deficit, the body will burn muscle"... which ultimately begs the question: wtf is the point of storing calories in fat if you're just gonna burn muscle (non-fat tissue which include your vital organs)?

Having said all that, you know what has been shown to result in weight loss? Clorie in calorie out. Oh, and Ozempic.
It hasn't. Refer to previous post where it's been explained, and in the video going into the technical details, which you've conveniently ignored, negating exactly this point you've typed.
 

coolgod

Major
Registered Member

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
Top