Miscellaneous News

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
In light of the recent debate, I stumbled on something that belongs in the funny thread but since it's gone, I'll drop it here:

Some US bot's take on Xi Jinping vocabulary: https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dqjhva
(to their credit, the commentator who wrote it defintely seems to have undergone formal education in Chinese, which must be a rarity among USG peeps)

Very impressive analysis. Now lets see one for Biden's vocabulary!
 

CMP

Captain
Registered Member
In light of the recent debate, I stumbled on something that belongs in the funny thread but since it's gone, I'll drop it here:

Some US bot's take on Xi Jinping vocabulary: https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dqjhva
(to their credit, the commentator who wrote it defintely seems to have undergone formal education in Chinese, which must be a rarity among USG peeps)

Very impressive analysis. Now lets see one for Biden's vocabulary!
The average IQ of that thread is 80 at best. And it's honestly quite interesting how many people there have a psychopathic and sadistic perspective. What could have possibly happened to them in their lives to have such thoughts? Being subjected to abuse throughout their lives seems likely.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
The average IQ of that thread is 80 at best. And it's honestly quite interesting how many people there have a psychopathic and sadistic perspective. What could have possibly happened to them in their lives to have such thoughts? Being subjected to abuse throughout their lives seems likely.
Rate of domestic abuse especially among low ranking public "servants" is very high

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Abused children often grow up to become abusers themselves. And likewise those born to petty authority also tend to follow the same careers as their parents. Hence psychopathy is common among the fodders of US government.
 

siegecrossbow

Field Marshall
Staff member
Super Moderator
In light of the recent debate, I stumbled on something that belongs in the funny thread but since it's gone, I'll drop it here:

Some US bot's take on Xi Jinping vocabulary: https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dqjhva
(to their credit, the commentator who wrote it defintely seems to have undergone formal education in Chinese, which must be a rarity among USG peeps)

Very impressive analysis. Now let’s i see one for Biden's vocabulary!

Xi wins by not using adult diapers.
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
In light of the recent debate, I stumbled on something that belongs in the funny thread but since it's gone, I'll drop it here:

Some US bot's take on Xi Jinping vocabulary: https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dqjhva
(to their credit, the commentator who wrote it defintely seems to have undergone formal education in Chinese, which must be a rarity among USG peeps)

Very impressive analysis. Now lets see one for Biden's vocabulary!
What's the point honestly. Xi was literally growing up during the cultural revolution so his education isn't completed. For some reason they love bringing up the cultural revolution all the time except for this time.

Taro Aso was literally prime minister of Japan and was known to read the kanji wrong. Unlike Xi he has no excuse. Yet this was never a major issue. I rmb some Taiwan leaders also have issues reading but I forgot who.

Let's not forget Biden even when he was young graduated near bottom of his class. Reagan was an actor. They had no cultural revolution either. Again these things were noticed but never considered an actual issue.
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
What's the point honestly. Xi was literally growing up during the cultural revolution so his education isn't completed. For some reason they love bringing up the cultural revolution all the time except for this time.

Taro Aso was literally prime minister of Japan and was known to read the kanji wrong. Unlike Xi he has no excuse. Yet this was never a major issue. I rmb some Taiwan leaders also have issues reading but I forgot who.

Let's not forget Biden even when he was young graduated near bottom of his class. Reagan was an actor. They had no cultural revolution either. Again these things were noticed but never considered an actual issue.
Xi did complete his education later and defended his thesis in law. He's done no different than ppl who took a gap year.

It's just funny to me how Americans combed random soundbites where Xi showed his regional accent or maybe misprounonced a single word while delivering an hour long speech/presentation. Meanwhile America's own top officials range from ppl who can't string together a coherent sentence, ppl barely intelligbly muttering under their breath "my son is not the loser not the sucker, you are the loser you are the sucker" on live television, a literal stroke victim with aphasia, and ppl inventing new english words out of nonsense.

By US' own logic, if an US president spoke in perfect southern drawl, that would mean he's uneducated and dumb. But we all know that if they had a leader like that, all their media and the nafo bots would (correctly) praise him as the most regal and articulate US president in the last 12 years.
 

d3dx9

New Member
Registered Member
In light of the recent debate, I stumbled on something that belongs in the funny thread but since it's gone, I'll drop it here:

Some US bot's take on Xi Jinping vocabulary: https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/dqjhva
(to their credit, the commentator who wrote it defintely seems to have undergone formal education in Chinese, which must be a rarity among USG peeps)

Very impressive analysis. Now lets see one for Biden's vocabulary!
I watched some of the videos from that link, and I don't think there's any major issue with Xi Jinping's pronunciation. If the education level of all Chinese people were to be judged by whether their pronunciation is perfectly standard, the vast majority of Chinese would be considered illiterate.
Anyone who has received higher education should realize that one's pronunciation should not be used to assess their level of education. The teacher who taught me the Computer Networks course during my undergraduate studies was from Kazakhstan. And to be honest, her English pronunciation was extremely poor. However, this does not change the fact that she was an excellent scholar, and indeed, I learned a lot from her
 

9dashline

Major
Registered Member
E tu Yang?


Well, many people’s worst fears were realized on Thursday, as President Biden had the most dismal and depressing performance in the history of presidential debates.

I had seen President Biden live in February. He did not look good. He was old and shuffling, his skin translucent. His delivery of remarks was uneven and performative – when he says something that is supposed to have emotion behind it but it seems like an old guy reading lines instead of genuine sentiment.

Still, I figured that his team had figured out a regimen to make him seem pumped up and energetic for 90 minutes – they seemed to have it pretty well managed for the State of the Union. I thought if they give him a week of rest and preparation Joe would probably be able to channel some of his vigor from his many debates of 2020, and he’d be genuinely fired up to debate Trump.

I was wrong. It was a doddering disaster.

One thing that was always in the back of my mind - a debate is a LOT harder than giving a speech off of a teleprompter. You have to have command of the material and some messages memorized. You have to project energy in response to your opponent and in some cases the moderators. Let’s say I had you memorize a 60-second message to camera. You’d have to be able to bust that out on command after 80 minutes of back and forth. It’s a lot of cognitive loading.

If someone asked me to give a good speech off of a teleprompter, I could do that with almost no notice. If someone asked me to do a great job at a televised debate it would take some runway. This was a much higher hurdle to clear than the State of the Union, and Joe Biden essentially faceplanted on the first lap.

So what happens now?

I’m clearly in the camp that Joe Biden should step aside and let the Democrats nominate someone else. A ticket of well-liked governors would be a much tougher foil for Trump than Joe and Kamala at this point. I got the hashtag #swapJoeout trending at one point.

The New York Times, the Atlantic, and even CNN have all piled on to make the same case. It’s been a remarkable shift. It’s tough to imagine a successful Democratic campaign that has lost the media to this degree.

But the Biden camp is digging in. The flagship Democrats – Obama, Harris, Newsom, Clyburn, Jeffries, Schumer – are circling the wagons, at least publicly. Donors are being managed and told to stay steady. Biden is campaigning away to try to demonstrate vitality. They have internalized the lesson – that has been true in the past – that if you hunker down you can weather any storm. Each passing day gives them more distance from the debate.

Still, behind the scenes some of the other candidates-in-waiting are staffing up and preparing.

Most debates don’t change a race fundamentally. This one is an exception – Americans saw firsthand that the President isn’t up to the job. He is running an unwinnable race. He is making the case that he is running to defend democracy, but then clinging to the office.

Joe Biden’s superpower has been that he’s a good man who will do right by the country. He is doing wrong by the country now. The question is whether anyone around him will have the courage and moral clarity to save him, and the rest of us, from himself.

If the debate made you wish for a new party in American politics, check out Forward – we are growing every day and got a lot of new recruits this week.

Andrew Yang
Co-Chair, Forward Party
 
Top