This post made by @CarlZha has been made IMPOSSIBLE for anyone user to repost, linked, like the comment.
What's up? You can see and try yourself if you have X.
View attachment 131229
This post with link was posted on this thread a couple pages ago.
That’s typical American MO. It goes something like this:
1) US creates a problem, eg tensions with North Korea
2) US tries to extricate itself from problem without losing face, fails.
3) US tries to get China to fix the problem which in no way relates to China
4) when China wants no part of it, US threatens China to fix the problem the U.S. caused, thereby creating another copy of the problem leading us back to 1).
you must remember that western leaders never experienced the ramifications of their actions, they believe in concepts like whipping boys and scapegoats and you see their members getting promoted after creating a mess eg von der leyen.
That has been their standard operating procedure everywhere they adventured, and you are correct that they never experienced the ramifications. This is because their opponents were always weak. During the NATO occupation of Afghanistan when Taliban had turned the table and shifted the momentum towards their own favor c.2010, US went on a limb to blame Pakistan for not securing the border, i.e. shift the blame on Pakistan which had a total military budget of less than $5 billion which was the most comical event of the war because the trillion dollar military of NATO with the most sophisticated systems could not secure the other side of the border themselves.
But now they have a formidable opponent in the form of China, and their usual tactics are no longer working. This is both a shock and a new experience for them. Everything new they do from here is an anxiogenic untested procedure, with an unknown result. Like they claimed of Russia resorting to nukes because Russia got nothing else left, if that claim is applied to themselves, then we can see their repeated rhetoric of employing nukes as an indication that they really got nothing else left in the barrel.
It's pretty clear that both sides are deranged
1. Americans for thinking south korea is a good model that people want to be like
2. South Koreans for being okay with being an americanised colony
Mass entertainment is what prevents society from becoming cognizant of and revolting against the absurd realities that surround them. Never mind the role models, and keep an eye on the sedative. The American drone operators realized quickly that they're killing innocent civilians; viewing a body of a child turning red to blue on an infrared camera's feed from 15000km away took a toll on the operators, so their senior management gave them endless entertainment and free booze every night with prostitutes. Because viewing silicone calcium cannons at night during your stupor will not endanger the status quo unlike the contemplation of a child's body changing colors on a screen caused by a trigger that you pulled in the morning.
You may note societies stricken with conflict generally have poor entertainment industries, as the public has more time and faculty to contemplate about and aggravate change in the real world; while societies with well-established entertainment industries generally have absurd realities with nobody to challenge the status quo in any meaningful way because their seditives are too potent.
In stuff like boxing or amateur wrestling I noticed from anecdotal evidence that the Indian guys who have success tend to be bigger than their opponents. However the catch is that this usually the lowest weight classes. Since they don't have such large frames, it's easier for a taller guy to fight in a smaller division and use his physical advantages like being 170 against people who are 160. The talent pool is also smaller since most countries aren't going to have a pro 5'9 guy weighing only 125 pounds. However this doesn't really work once you start going up weight classes coz the weight goes up but your height doesn't go proportionally. And this where more countries start feeling comfortable at that weight class. Suddenly an Indian finds himself against a guy who's similar height as him but buff as hell. Oh dear.
It's also why you may notice India has more success at u23 or u20 but suddenly the success goes away at senior adult level. Again they can exaggerate a guys age and make an experienced guy go against some inexperienced teenage opponent. An adult basically picking on a kid younger than him.
So as sardaukar said, Indians really love picking on people they perceive as smaller than them. They avoid similar size guys and pipe down quickly when the bigger guys arrive. The problem is when they misjudged the guys they perceived as smaller which is how some big buff Punjabi jawan is now captured and kneeling in front of some Chinese Manlet who tells him to pulls his ears like kids do at school when do they do something wrong. Truly humiliating.
Speaking of boxing, in an unrelated event, the Anglo-Saxon feminazis in their unequal right's campaign once put a women's professional boxer with a 3-0 win-loss record against a shorter unknown ethnic Chinese male b̶o̶x̶e̶r̶ jockey with a 0-2 record and high blood pressure to show the world that women can beat men. The fight displayed how much strong women struggle against supposedly weak men. After the judges gave a controversial and marginal victory to the woman, a reporter asked Chow what the fight proved, to which he responded: "It proves a woman cannot hurt a man."
Since then, every memory of this fight has been supressed in the media, not allowing even a clip to surface. I watched the fight in school 25 years ago and the students couldn't stop laughing how he was toying with her and running around the ring.