Hollywood.. pretty much was invented by migrant Jews in early 1900s. They took the narrative of the Zionists and instilled it into the minds of Americans through false representations in media.
Poor crane operatorZPMC would like to send their regards (and their product catalog for new container cranes).
At first I thought it was a Chinese ship but if turn out to be Taiwanese owned. HiyaZPMC would like to send their regards (and their product catalog for new container cranes).
I’m sure they will wait 30 years for the Mitsui MADE IN THE USA cranesZPMC would like to send their regards (and their product catalog for new container cranes).
Well Indo-Europeans are descendants of nomadic Eurasian steppe tribes like Mongols and Turkic, Most of their history they made a living by being glorified porch pirates
is it an Anglo or Indo-European thing to steal from successful foreign companies and people? Indians did it to ZTE as the anglos are doing it to Binance and attempting to do it to TikTok.
I’m sure they will wait 30 years for the Mitsui MADE IN THE USA cranes
edit:
Link
20B for “national security”, why aren’t people laughing at this like The Wall which was also for “national security” and roughly the same cost.
there are alot of Ukranians and French in Canada are those also protestant. That Greek Ukrainian church is Catholic.Canada wasn't founded by Catholics. It was founded by Protestants who hate Catholics. Most of the ruling class have also been Protestant. Protestant schools aren't funded by the government.
Yup UAE/Iraq/Oman and every thing associated with them?. Iran is well integrated into Arabic economic system.Except Iran.
Abbasi, one of the most prominent hardliners in the Iranian regime, said in the circulating clip: “When Soleimani was targeted, we received $3 billion from Qatar in compensation, because the drone that targeted him was launched from Qatar.”
Abbasi's statements may explain the hasty visit of the Qatari Foreign Minister to Tehran just hours after Soleimani's killing, which was followed by another visit by the Emir of Qatar days later
you ignore the US President meeting with Saudi King. and it is not just Israel but division of India that was integral to Arab interests. and it is that Arabic soft power behind Israel and India to keep muslim discipline now.Um.. European Rothschilds financed both Hitler and Britain in WWII, and pretty much forced Britain to create Israel.
First the house that he bought was designed by another Arab and that person probably knew that only Arab can afford this scale of home in that region. if they are decadent how can they have greatest Soft Power ever created? and i would think they have amassed greatest wealth in the world due to family structure. and only they are keeping afloat various design houses in Europe. If this trend continue Master Slave relationship will be created.So much Arab soft power.. but still cannot make a motor for a go-kart. Arab royals are decadent which is why they live lavish lives in Europe because they are too stupid to know how to spend their wealth. What you're thinking of as soft power is nothing more than a bunch of people telling the world that we have a lot of money and the only thing we know what to do with it is spend it on products/services made by our foreign colonial masters. You're talking about a country whose major contribution to the world, apart from oil, is dates grown on trees.
Every civilization starts with democracy. In a tribal system, the chief has limited power and has oversight by elders. Centralized leadership is a more advanced system that performs much more efficiently, but when failing is more catastrophic. The power that comes from centralization has to be managed. This is what humans have been trying to resolve for the past 5000 years.Agreed on the first part. But I would argue that inept leadership will make any type of government suck. Whether it's a democracy, autocracy, monarchy, theocracy, or whatever.
Historically, many autocracies were voted in by democracies. Just like how Hitler and Mussolini were voted into power, India is also going through a similar political journey. Too many Indians who could vote were captured by the BJP's constant promise of a Supapowar Bharat Hindu Empire. Nations who like that are quite prone to going to war. But thanks to India's sheer incompetence, they were unable to act on their warmongering dreams.
Assuming that India doesn't collapse from it's internal contradictions, if India continues going down this path, its going to eventually get itself into a war.
To the West, everything is politics. If you're their enemy, even your own land is not recognized by them as yours. But if you're their friend, you can invade, butcher, massacre, and take other lands at will. They'll happily recognize your gains and tell the world that you have rightfully gained what you have taken.
India to it's Asian neighbours is considered an expansionist power. And quite a nasty one too. It is an artificial nation created by the British. It had claimed and annexed territories that had never belonged to it prior to British colonisation. But this point of view had been suppressed and dismissed by the West because India is their darling. After all, India uses their political system, it speaks the Anglo language, and most importantly, it is a willing pet of the Anglos.
Ironically, India's new Hindutva path, and the waning power of its Anglo masters will eventually put it's identity into question. What is India actually without the British Empire? What is this Akhand Bharat? It has never actually existed in history. If India does go on a rampage to realize Akhand Bharat, then all of these questions will eventually emerge.