Due to effects of Tibetan genocide you see a lot fewer Tibetans in the second photo.
Also the smiles seems a whole lot more genuine in the 1980s photo, compared to the 2024 one.
Due to effects of Tibetan genocide you see a lot fewer Tibetans in the second photo.
Taylor Swift completely avoiding both China and Taiwan when Taiwan made great effort to get here there.
Aside from the fact its not correct and its obviously done to remove Chinese influence, the most offensive thing is it just sounds so low-energy and weak. Like try typing it out to people. It sounds so fake and weak just like Happy Holidays. You can feel its fakeness being forced on you.The western, specifically Anglo propaganda organs doing their thing over “lunar new year” is the same bs red herring propaganda diversionary tactic the Anglo oligarchs always use to waste the public’s bandwidth and attention span so they don’t focus on the real news that matters. Things like how Yellen has to go begging bowl to China yet again or that the USG may have to do another round of QE or that conscription was a hot topic of discussion last week.
They did it to death throughout the 90s and 2000s over the “war on Christmas” by gettin ppl to fight ppl over “happy holidays” as opposed to “merry Christmas“. Whichever mean girls boomer tier CIA team that came up with ”lunar new year” should really go out more and meet real people.
This is why right wing liberalism doesn't work: nobody actually wants it. Only those who are extremely out of touch think that people focus all day on the exceptional rights of some 5% minorities or vocabulary policing or something.Aside from the fact its not correct and its obviously done to remove Chinese influence, the most offensive thing is it just sounds so low-energy and weak. Like try typing it out to people. It sounds so fake and weak just like Happy Holidays. You can feel its fakeness being forced on you.
That's why there's a popular quote about the "liberals": Scratch a Liberal, and you'll find a FASCIST.This is why right wing liberalism doesn't work: nobody actually wants it. Only those who are extremely out of touch think that people focus all day on the exceptional rights of some 5% minorities or vocabulary policing or something.
Both socialism and conservatism/fascism have simple messages that actually appeal to the majority. I can't think of even 1 person that will genuinely fight for liberalism when physical consequences are on the line. Many of those who say they are, are actually fascists.
Rest easy, I am fundamentally ineligible for PRC leadership. However, what I proposed is entirely in reaction. How can retaliation be seen as aggression?I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm fearful for the next generation of Chinese leadership. The strength that China has displayed in restraint has the collective west losing their minds and not knowing what to do. China hasn't fallen for their traps and has come out strong. Do not let them bait you into doing anything that will appear like China is the aggressor, time is on China's side!
easily. just a matter of framing.How can retaliation be seen as aggression?