I am of the firm belief that the existing setup of the UN (with a handful of countries possessing veto power) is itself discriminatory, unequal, oppressive, and conducive to neo colonialism. While the order itself "apparently" aims to create global equality, end oppression and discrimination. The aim and (unchangeable) reality are contradictory.
The West in particular is caught in a Catch 22 situation (not the first time). When it suits them, they trap their enemies/opposition with UN; when it doesn't suit them, they themselves defy UN without penalty. A better name for UN is United Colonies.
In the case of Israel, a big Western investment that solved the
, the West has to decide between two polar opposite options with no middle ground:
- Support the UN system, that they created, by penalizing Israel for violations.
- Support Israel and show the world that their UN system is a farce.
I believe that ^^ is why Western leaders may show some contempt for Israel, telling it to calm down because it is hurting their global colonial order, while doing nothing to penalize it. They've chosen option #1 which carries the risk of delegitimizing the UN order itself.