China itself has and should also keep not mentioning the "one China policy" which was initially an American attempt to legitimize territorial aggression, and China was forced to accept a compromise it in order to reclaim its UNSC seat with minimal hassle and to deescalate nuclear showdown in Asia.Notice the subtitle but fundamentally important change in language. It changed from the One China policy to our One China policy. And Americans are the masters of bullshit interpretations so the One China policy is dead at this point. The only thing keeping America in line is Chinese raw hard power.
"one China" is highly problematic because it encourages the notion that there can be legal rival claimants to governance in China.
Officials should strike one China from their vocabulary entirely and instead speak about "China's right to security" and "territorial defense".