Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Talking about rural China...
Parents can barely read and write is scratching the surface... lighting and running water are luxuries, heat is directly proportional to amount of kindling collected, almost zero support structure for post-secondary aspirations...

It is a better now with the Poverty alleviation programs making progress, but even the government acknowledges much work is still to be done. Clearly OP has no clue what life in rural China is like.
To be fair, that person is a byproduct of that same "elite" group who rightfully find distasteful and abhorrent, which may or may not affect his overall analysis and objectivity on this matter. The same thing can be said to many of us here quite frankly.
 

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not enough though. The country’s Household Registration System (Hukou) system really disadvantages the true patriots (migrant workers and constructions workers/engineers who actually built China’s cities, high-speed rail, and serve in the military), whilst privileging the rich Shanghainese and Beijing liberals who see themselves as superior to their countrymen simply because they see themselves as “more western and inernationalised (国际化)”. In fact, even my white British friends are sickened by some of China’s supposedly cosmopolitan second-generation riches because the latters would drive Ferraris and talk about climate change and need for China be more more democratic on one hand, whilst spitting on and disparaging migrant workers and peasants at the same time. I am 100% for technology-oriented market economy, but the excesses of China’s supposed elites is way worse than most Western countries. They pretend to represent the best of liberalism, but they actually posses worst of both the East and the West. Reforming the Hukou system is one way to diminish the power of these arrogant and pretentious elites, whilst enhancing social mobility.
Liberals get the bullet too. But neoliberals—they get the bullet first.
 

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member
No, alternatives is city and rural should have equal treatments. If the kid is rich but has more merit than the rural one, he deserves to get in. If he don't, no advantage. No more no less.
no, this only sounds like its fair, but in the end a rich kid has access to so much more resources such as private tutor, extra time freed from not having to do home chores etc.
 

OTCDebunker

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Bet you won’t see any republicans screeching about it. Japan just bought a big chuck of US steel production with a annual capacity of 22.4 million tons.
Cleveland-Cliffs and U.S. Steel were supposed to merge together and all the murikan news outlets were bragging about how they'd make soooooo much steel...equivalent to about 1/4th of the Baowu Group.

Hahahahahaha

Now it's not even that paltry amount (technically).

And these maniacs honestly think that a war where attrition of heavy industrial weapons is going to go well for them.
 

Intention

New Member
Registered Member
Not really. Rural regions get affirmative actions via easier tests. Therefore these rural kids are not actually more competent than urban kids.

I am not Chinese so I might be completely off, but my understanding is that the Gaokao score is administered provincially so it isn't strictly a rural vs urban divide. A student in Chengdu would likely reach a higher percentile for their province than one in Guangzhou who has the same score so they would have better chances getting into an elite university? Individual universities set provincial quotas though and normally they favour their home province, so the kid from Guangzhou can go to Sun Yat-sen and the Chengdu kid goes to Tsinghua? Everyone is happy.
I don't know how effective it is in practice but I support some kind of regional adjustment to reflect variation in levels of development and promote national cohesion.
 

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
The US is exerting pressure on Saudi Arabia to delay the signing of a peace agreement with Yemen and instead join an expanded maritime protection task force to confront Yemeni attacks against Israeli-linked ships in the Red Sea.

According to a report by Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, a draft peace deal between Sanaa and Riyadh has been finalized. It could be signed before the end of the year, potentially ending a NATO-backed war that has decimated the Arab world's poorest country for eight years.

“Saudi Arabia is going through a difficult test between two options […] Either it will emerge from the Yemeni quagmire under a roadmap agreed upon with Sanaa, or it will submit to US dictates and join the international maritime coalition, and this means remaining vulnerable to [western] blackmail,” the Al-Akhbar report details.

Despite the pressure from Washington, the kingdom is reportedly “continuing on the path to peace" and is working to “speed up” the completion of the peace agreements to avoid “further obstruction by the Emiratis or local agents.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Zionist ruling clsss are screaming that if Israel must suffer shipping attacks, all of its goyim slave states must demonstrate fealty and solidarity by similarly taking the long route and expense as Israeli shipping.

Funny, any other insurer would consider shipping to Israel as uninsurable considering wars and conflicts are exclusions yet the Zionist ruling class are forcing shipping insurance companies to continue insuring.
 

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
❌ US Def Sec Lloyd Austin announces ‘Operation Prosperity Guardian’ to respond to “reckless Houthi attacks” from Yemen in Red Sea.

"Operation Prosperity Guardian", is a new international task force aim to target Yemen under the pretext of "protecting ships in the Red Sea from Houthi attacks".


The group will include the UK, Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.

@DDGeopolitics

Notably, Bahrain is the only arab country they managed to pressure into participating. From the Guardian article I posted yesterday :

The US had been seeking to persuade China to join an enlarged maritime protection force being mounted out of Bahrain, but some officials believe it has secured the involvement of Jordan, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Egypt and Bahrain.
 
Last edited:

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Israel plans ‘new ground war against Hezbollah’​

Israel’s military has drawn up plans to invade southern Lebanon, risking a further escalation in the war in the Middle East and in the face of calls for restraint from its western allies.

The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) says it wants to drive Hezbollah forces in the southern Lebanon north to the Litani River, a line of symbolic importance for both sides.

The two sides have been exchanging artillery and missile fire since the start of the war in Gaza in early October. Initial fears that the conflict would spread more seriously to other fronts were lowered when Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, said the group would not launch a major offensive unless provoked or unless Hamas was on the verge of an overwhelming defeat.

However, Israel’s politicians and military strategists say they have decided that they cannot accept a simple ceasefire with Hezbollah at the end of the current war in Gaza.

About 86,000 people have fled or been evacuated from the border area since the missile exchanges began, and a senior IDF officer said on Sunday that many would be unlikely to return even with a ceasefire. Given Hezbollah’s much greater strength compared with Hamas, the IDF feared the scale of a potential October 7-style attack in the north of Israel.

“What happened in the south is nothing compared to what they could do here,” the senior officer said. “Israeli doctrine is to take the war to the other side.”

The decision as to whether to launch a ground force across the border is one for Binyamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, and his war cabinet.

The dirt road towards the Israel-Lebanon border. Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, is said to be nervous about starting a conflict on a new front

But there could be no going back to the status quo before October 7, Lt Col Jonathan Conricus, an IDF spokesman, said. “The IDF is prepared, has been preparing,” he added. “The IDF chief of staff has approved plans and defined schedules for readiness.”

There has been internal debate within the war cabinet from the beginning as to how seriously to take the threat from Hezbollah, which is both a political and militia force in Lebanon, backed with a large arsenal of weapons provided by Iran.

Some assessments say that Hezbollah is afraid of a political backlash inside Lebanon if it became sucked into a serious conflict with Israel, which has repeatedly threatened to rain destruction on the country if that occurred.

Hezbollah is dominant due to its own Shia community, which forms a majority in the south, but needs some political cover from Christian, Sunni and Druze communities which would also be devastated in the case of an all-out war.

However, the IDF believes that Hezbollah nurses hopes of limited attacks in northern Israel, and it already regards the abandonment of the border area by its civilian population as a victory.

Of the war cabinet, Netanyahu is said to be the most nervous about starting a conflict on a new front, even as the IDF continues to face fierce resistance in Gaza and worldwide opposition to the extent of the civilian casualties it is inflicting there.
Yoav Gallant, Israel’s defence minister and former IDF general, has been bullish about the need to deter Hezbollah, however.

Earlier this month, he demanded that Hezbollah withdraw its forces north of the Litani, or that Israel would force it to do so. Israel would “act with all the means at its disposal” if no peaceful means to ensure that were not enacted, he said.

On Sunday he went on the offensive again. “We want to restore peace and we will do it either through an agreement, or with forceful action, with all its implications,” he told soldiers at the northern border.

The Litani River is significant because at the end of the brief 2006 conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, a UN ceasefire resolution agreed on the removal of all armed forces in Lebanon to north of the river, except for the UN peacekeeping force and the official Lebanese army.

Hezbollah has nevertheless made the area a well-fortified stronghold and missile base, claiming as part justification that Israel has not withdrawn from a small disputed area of the Golan Heights it has laid claim to.

Many analysts have assumed that the heightened Israeli rhetoric is largely an effort to put pressure on countries with ties to Lebanon to force a Hezbollah concession. France has said it would be prepared to make that argument.

However, there is little sign Hezbollah would ever withdraw voluntarily — its forces on the Israeli border playing a major role in its argument that it is the main power “resisting” Israel.

The Israeli government is also under increasing pressure to take action from residents of the area, keen to return to their homes.

“We are terrified here,” said Benny Pilveri, 62, a manager at a large egg farm in Dovev, on the border with Lebanon. “We need to get rid of Hezbollah, get them far away from the border.”

For historic reasons, the border area is home to 70 per cent of Israel’s egg production, and Pilveri and two colleagues, who have evacuated with their families to Tiberias further south, return every day to collect the eggs from the 250,000 chickens they oversee. Their coops were hit by a Hezbollah rocket two weeks ago, only eggs and no chickens were destroyed, and another rocket hit and killed an electrician restoring power to the farm.

The three men bring a bottle of cognac with them on their daily mission, which they say helps numb the fear. But they agree this is not a long-term solution.

Israel Yakouti, Dovev’s mayor, said the government wanted the community to invest millions of dollars in new coops, but this was unrealistic without security. “There’s no way people are going to come back while this is all happening,” he said.

The other concern is that the IDF, already seen by some as having set itself unreasonable goals in Gaza by insisting it will “eradicate Hamas”, would be taking an even bigger risk in trying to take on Hezbollah, a larger and better equipped force.

The IDF’s performance in the 2006 war was widely regarded as poor, including by its own officers. They insist, however, that lessons have been learned and Hezbollah, now battle-hardened from its role in the Syrian war, will not be under-estimated again.

At a watch-tower on the border yesterday, a sergeant who gave his name as Itai, a veteran of the 2006 war who has been called up again from the reserves, said he was now much better trained for the sort of guerilla fighting at which Hezbollah excels.

“What happened in 2006 was a total disaster,” he said. “But we will not make the same mistakes again.”
Israel’s politicians and military strategists say they have decided that they cannot accept a simple ceasefire with Hezbollah at the end of the current war in Gaza.
the senior officer said. “Israeli doctrine is to take the war to the other side.”
Lt Col Jonathan Conricus, an IDF spokesman, said. “The IDF is prepared, has been preparing,” he added. “The IDF chief of staff has approved plans and defined schedules for readiness.”

Basically the nail in the coffin for Biden 2024 if the war expands. Meanwhile, it will be an actual coffin for Ukraine.
 

ChongqingHotPot92

Junior Member
Registered Member
Liberals get the bullet too. But neoliberals—they get the bullet first.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That’s what I mean by arrogant Chinese liberal elites (in this case, a Shanghai belle again). If the context within this video were true (albeit posted by an anti-CCP dude), it shows how incredibly arrogant and rude these rich liberal elites (who themselves benefited from the Party state) are. In this case, a rich Shanghai girl (many Shanghai women are infamous for being gold diggers, fake feminists, and fantasising Anglo-Saxon men, whilst belittling Asian and black men) publicly humiliating a PAP soldier and tell him to go earn money instead of serving the Party. I recall something like this happened during the white paper movement as well, when rich spoiled Shanghai belles telling police officers to quit their low paying jobs and start earning money.

My apology if this is interpreted as misogynistic, but there are fellow Chinese, especially the well-connected neoliberal novel rich in Shanghai and Beijing, who are simply disgusting by pretending to cherish the best of liberalism and equality for all, whilst engaging in actions representing the most feudalistic and zero-sum mindsets (way more feudalistic and elitist (I mean pretentious) than even the present-say European nobilities).
 
Top