D
Deleted member 24525
Guest
I pointed out, correctly, that there exists no evidence that a compound like that describes actually exists. I then provided further reasoning for why this is correct by saying that such a compound, if it existed, would almost certainly be used prolifically, and therefore we would observe a much higher than normal rate of heart attacks among political elites. But we don't, so it very likely doesn't exist.I'm not the one claiming China does not possess that technology, the onus is on you to backup your assertions.
You then deflected by moving the goalposts and asking me to essentially scour every nook and crany of the entire world to prove that it doesn't exist, a kind of request that is reminiscent of those made by religious individuals when faced with someone who points out the lack of evidence in God, or maybe more relevantly, a liberal when faced with the lack of evidence of mass killing of Uyghurs. Such a request is obviously ridiculous and you can't really expect me to take it seriously.
Last edited by a moderator: