Miscellaneous News

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
lol are you serious?
Are you seriously questioning that the Americans wouldn't do it if they had the chance? Seriously they examine the poop or foreign dignitaries to gain advantage. Don't tell me your that naive. That's why the US secret service takes their presidents feces with them. Do you have medical knowledge to say otherwise?
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Are you seriously questioning that the Americans wouldn't do it if they had the chance? Seriously they examine the poop or foreign dignitaries to gain advantage. Don't tell me you’re that naive. That's why the US secret service takes their presidents feces with them. Do you have medical knowledge to say otherwise?
Omg you are being serious!

Xi Jinping is not going to be poisoned while visiting America. Just stop it.
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Are you seriously questioning that the Americans wouldn't do it if they had the chance? Seriously they examine the poop or foreign dignitaries to gain advantage. Don't tell me your that naive. That's why the US secret service takes their presidents feces with them. Do you have medical knowledge to say otherwise?
It's one thing to passively observe the poop for whatever reason and another thing to commit brazen acts of war.

If US doesn't even dare let ships react when Chinese ships and planes spam radar lock/unlock on them, why would they start a war in the worst possible way by poisoning Chinese officials?

President Xi is an intelligent and well spoken leader. Hes also far, far from the only person who can lead China. And there are also many far more destructive personalities that would be more powerful during wartime leadership.

US cannot hide any action they take against the delegation, and that would lead to a state where open season is on all US officials, from top to bottom.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
The Taiwanese believed in the status quo, both side want a peaceful resolution, how to achieved that is for us to decide NOT the American or anybody else.

I believed that in 2030 the American will leave the Pacific for good, they can't sustained their current imperial agenda and will suffer a system collapse if they didn't change course. The trajectory is there for everyone to see, by that time the Chinese will have an escalatory dominance from the SCS to the second Island chain, defending Taiwan will be an oxymoron decision as logistically and militarily is impossible to defend and IF America is defeated or even 1 aircraft carrier is sunk, its prestige will suffer and hasten its collapse.

This show of force is design to force the Chinese into a settlement that is favorable to the US, there is an acceptance that their plan for 2025 war is deemed impossible as they were bogged down in Ukraine and in the middle east. Will the Chinese complied, well there is NO harm in talking and time is on her side, there is an unerring confidence among the CCP leadership that 2025 is the inflection point, they will able to solved their vulnerability (semiconductor and aircraft engine) and the following years will only increase its Comprehensive National Power.
That is certainly very optimisitc and reasonable, thats why I reject that because it is too rational. American politicians are not rational.

What will happen is Americans beg China not to start a war, while offering almost no concession. China reject the offer. Politican use it to justify China bad, I am tough on China. Then it loops back to domestic propaganda only.

Example:

Joe: How about you promise not starting trouble in Asia while I am busy. I offer to sanction 90% of your semiconductor instead of 95%.

Xi: How about no. We act as we fit.

Media: Joe lectured evil Xi and stared him right in the eye. Big win.

China gets nothing. US politicians gets some media points.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The fact is they can do nothing unless the US wants to be a dictatorship. Why don't they just order everyone on what stories they can air or movies and TV shows they make? It shows how much this committee can nothing but superficial nonsense to say to Americans they're doing something.
The US government is not known for superficial nonsense.

The US government definitely rationally spent $55 million to try to arrest Barry Bonds for using steroids. It was not their fault that the case fell apart because his buddy didn't snitch.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Omg you are being serious!

Xi Jinping is not going to be poisoned while visiting America. Just stop it.
Are you saying it's not even plausible? Off the top of my head I can think of many ways to make Xi sick, and it wouldn't kick in until he left the US or even a week later. Just a quick example. Food laced with Apixaban and plavix causing a GI or hemorrhagic stroke. Easier than you think. Undetectable after a few days. I work in medial overdose and toxicology. What are your credentials?

I mean the US allowed their company to sell HIV laced hemophilia drug to HK in the 80s causing a spike in HIV cases in China. It's true, google it if you don't believe me. I would not put it past the US to try and poison people they deem to be key in another countries stability.

Are you one of those people who also think that Canada would never kidnap Meng Wanzhou? Or the US would never dare to bomb the Chinese embassy in Belgrade?

Every possibility needs it be considered and properly vetted. It's a war. So get off your high horse and consider all the possibilities.
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Are you saying it's not even plausible? Off the top of my head I can think of many ways to make Xi sick, and it wouldn't kick in until he left the US or even a week later. Just a quick example. Food laced with Apixaban and plavix causing a GI or hemorrhagic stroke. Easier than you think. Undetectable after a few days. I work in medial overdose and toxicology. What are your credentials?

I mean the US allowed their company to sell HIV laced hemophilia drug to HK in the 80s causing a spike in HIV cases in China. It's true, google it if you don't believe me. I would not put it past the US to try and poison people they deem to be key in another countries stability.

Are you one of those people who also think that Canada would never kidnap Meng Wanzhou? Or the US would never dare to bomb the Chinese embassy in Belgrade?

Every possibility needs it be considered and properly vetted. It's a war. So get off your high horse and consider all the possibilities.
Loll. Keep worrying about how U.S. may lace Xi’s food with Eliquis. I won’t stop you from embarrassing yourself further.

Of all the things you can worry about between US - China relations, you’re worried about Xi getting poisoned.
 
Top