Miscellaneous News

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Better to eat bitterness than eat to shit, which is something the garden is gonna discover very soon!

I don’t know about that I’m afraid. Jai Hinds love shit from cows aka bullshits, might be why the notoriously colour sensitive west isn’t all that bothered by the Indian takeover of certain western countries and companies.

Also, pretty sure garden vegetables love shit of all variants, which is a core reason why China is now actively helping the US to return the EU to its preferred, natural state - a de-industrialised garden and farm, for their citizens to visit as a quant tourism destination and source of organic foods (the current overpriced problem will be solved once the sheeple of these lands listen to the advice of their own betters and just accept that being poor is their lot in life now).
 

daifo

Captain
Registered Member

Once China starts taking market share from European shipbuilders, how long do you think it would take the US or EU to start sanctioning Chinese shipyards for national security reasons... LOL.

Not sure how popular "cruise" are in China, but it seems like a good "soft power" industry to grow. Bring tons of Chinese tourist to random pacific islands and ports around asia which helps to bring them onto "china's side". Staff can be hired from the poorer regions of China. Assuming the cruise company is Chinese, most of the money stays "internal".
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
That choice was always a complete lie and inversion of truth and reality. The only way China would ever have become a security threat to Australia is if Australia first became a security threat to China.

Australia could have had prosperity and security both, and all it had to do was nothing. Stay neutral in America’s race war against China and live free, rich and safe.
What you are writing here is being told as a betrayal of values. China was made an adversary in the Anglosphere using almost religious arguments. The word "Democracy" is being used to rally people just like "Christ" was getting used by the Vatican 1000 years ago. So this is nothing new. It happening in the 21st century also show Anglosphere's education systems are bad at teaching critical thinking. Australia won't be the first country to do unreasonable things over religion either.
The info he posted my be some years back which could be true. Either he intentionally trying to mislead or he is hopelessly outdated by China speed.
According to wiki, 70% of all pharmaceuticals were domestic in China of 2007. The guy's data is not even outdated. It is outright wrong.
 

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
Hmmm a good way to basically chase away every Chinese talent that could’ve helped that sorry nation and given how stupid these people are, they will chase away all Asian talent in that nation........If that nation undergoes the purge, I everyone hear to shed no tears but simply take it as a story of caution instead, what freedom and democracy ultimately ends up becoming, especially under America characteristics, no one will miss this nation and many will not give a rats ass when it finally goes down

Funny that you mentioned this, as I'm rewatching The Purge, one of my favorite series of films and because life imitates art, showing us the trajectory of American "greatness"... The experiment of freedom and democracy has high chances of failure, but things get really interesting (and entertaining for us folks on the opposite side of the Pacific) when this precarious social experiment is mixed with plenty of guns, massive racial tension and inequality, a collapsing economy and fentanyl....


The Purge.jpg
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
I wonder what law did this scrapper break except the sensitivity and significance of the wreck. Just because the American or British says "it is illegal" doesn't make it illegal.

The wreck is far out of any territorial water of any state. Malaysia got involved only because the wreck is within its EEZ (100km off Malaysian coast). However, any coastal state only has limited jurisdiction and right in its EEZ, namely economical related matters, such as fishing and oil gas etc. A ship wreck isn't economical resource, so Malaysian law seems not apply. The UK is the owner of the wreck, but it is outside of UK territory, so UK law does not apply either. There is no international law covering such matter as far as I know.

An analogy can be made inside a country, there are many dead bodies on Zhumulangma (Mount Everest) which is a public land, not grave yard, moving their bodies are perfectly legal without the concent of relatives. But in reality, the concent is sought after as respect for the deceased.

I am not advocating such kind of activity, but I doubt that the scrapper would end up in any legal panalty, nor do I think such activity would stop because there is no legal base to prevent it, nor can any country to amend their domestic law to prevent it without changing international treaty on EEZ.
We are using lands an soil where thousands of soldiers died... I think salvaging a battleship is clearly not worse than spraying manure on your ancestry and tilling their bones and resting places relentlessly.
 

KYli

Brigadier
After scratching my head and ask how, I realize that MSM is shameless and doesn't need fact. Mental masturbation in this article is just too much.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Apart from that brief statement, there is no detail whatever in the chummily positive Corporate Plan about the threat to peace on Earth posed by China’s well-advanced preparations for war – not even a line about putting a stop to decades of Chinese IP theft from British centres of space-related scientific and technical excellence.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
After scratching my head and ask how, I realize that MSM is shameless and doesn't need fact. Mental masturbation in this article is just too much.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Apart from that brief statement, there is no detail whatever in the chummily positive Corporate Plan about the threat to peace on Earth posed by China’s well-advanced preparations for war – not even a line about putting a stop to decades of Chinese IP theft from British centres of space-related scientific and technical excellence.
I'm often pleasantly surprised by the comment section in these articles. The top comment about Newton's Principia is particularly funny.
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
I'm often pleasantly surprised by the comment section in these articles. The top comment about Newton's Principia is particularly funny.
Jokes aside Britain is still very successful at research. Its universities outperform American universities per personnel by a significant margin. But it has a bad economy and industry. Therefore it has many technologies that are stuck at low-tech readiness levels. Still, claiming that Chinese success is because of tech theft from Britain is ridiculous.

To people who are confused by tech readiness level:
1685640896034.png
 
Top