Both Johnson and Sunak have sullied the good name of Churchill.
If Boris wanted to be like Churchill he would have been Putin's best friend and ordered the carpet bombing of Kiev.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
If Boris wanted to be like Churchill he would have been Putin's best friend and ordered the carpet bombing of Kiev.
The petrodollar is coming under massive attack
india may believe it can get away with stuff because both blocs want it on their side, but it’s evident after doklam and galwan that India is of questionable use as an ally anyway. Poor fighters, and slavishly Anglo. They bloody wanted English as an official language of the SCO!! Cucks.
For the British ruling class it’s personal. The tsars who were overthrown were related to the British royal famil, but that didn’t stop the house of Saxe-Coburg from denying asylum to the Romanovs.
why did the Anglo Atlanticists hold the meeting in Hiroshima?
because the message is they want for nuke Asians again and genocide Chinese as they genocided the native Americans.
I was wondering why Hiroshima of all places. That makes a lot of sense. The colonial slavers have bullying and genocide encoded into their DNA, all they know is to double-down on the gunboat diplomacy. But they can't do it to the actual lands they covet, so instead they can only turn their rage onto their whipping boy vassals. Extra extra humiliation for the Japanese. I'm not sorry for them.
Taiwanese crusaders: 'Other Than Money, There Is Something We Call Values'
Boris is emotionally invested into the Ukraine project. Remember when Macron stepped out of line? Here’s Boris saying they should take Macron to the back rooms and beat the shit out of him.
I feel that the Japanese PM really takes it up where the sun don't shine and even walks a little funny. Purposely nuking a 2 cities to kill civilians seems like a major war crime to me. Some claimed it was unecessary but to show up the Soviets. Considering today's rheotorics, I kinda don't feel this little ceremony as genuine for some reason.
It is just a dog and pony show and the intended audience isn't for us but for Japanese citizens. Nuking civilians is never justifiable but between another million of Americans and allies troops that would need to die in order to take Japan. I think it is a necessary evil. In addition, as much as these politicians laying flowers today, most of them won't hesitate to do it again if their rivals can't retaliate in kind.
But for many mainland Chinese, I do believe they would choose not to nuke Japan during WW2 so that they could seek revenge and made Japanese paid for their crimes. As much as some people claimed that it is time to forgive and forget, Japanese never paid for their crimes and compare with the suffer that Asians and especially China by the hands of Japan, Japanese got away too easy with the nuke. That's why I never understand why they have the audacity to play victims. But as long as you are the ally of the West, you probably can get away with anything.
But for many mainland Chinese, I do believe they would choose not to nuke Japan during WW2 so that they could seek revenge and made Japanese paid for their crimes. As much as some people claimed that it is time to forgive and forget, Japanese never paid for their crimes and compare with the suffer that Asians and especially China by the hands of Japan, Japanese got away too easy with the nuke. That's why I never understand why they have the audacity to play victims. But as long as you are the ally of the West, you probably can get away with anything.
See what I mean when I say the British ruling class is too emotionally invested in the Ukraine war and Russia?
But it wasn’t like they were on good terms with the Tsars either, having fought the Crimean War in the 19th c.
Remember what happened after the Jingkang incident and why there are no more jurchens as a real political state and entity.
The Jingkang incident was the Song dynasty equivalent of the rape of Nanjing with the jurchens being the offending party. Eventually, the jurchens were destroyed by the mongols and later became the Manchu.
In fact, in the event of war, I’m personally in favour of inducting Japan as a new province of the PRC along with South Korea. If these former protectorates of imperial China don’t know what to do with their independence and would rather live on their knees as the white mans coolie, then they should be deprived of said “independence“.
Militarism and it's natural follow-on of colonialism is in fact not something dirty that China should avoid at all. That type of thinking makes the country less able to tackle external threats.
Most colonized countries love their colonizers. Why? Because you can impose total control over their elites, which will sway the dregs because the dregs in most societies have no freedoms and simply live vicariously through their elites.
Throughout Asia, the countries that have been occupied by the West will never love China - unless they've become counter occupied by China, in which case they will become the staunchest sources of support for China. To institute increased militarism, create the colonial systems, is the most efficient way to win hearts and minds. Of course, the communists do not acknowledge this, but the beauty is that eventually, their hand will be forced by the west anyways.
Authoritarianism throttles a country's growth, but liberalism throttles a country's ability to leverage strength. The west is the king of authoritarianism, able to control the minds of almost all their population and exert complete military and economic control over the formerly(currently still de facto) occupied. That also makes the west the kings of not growing economies, not inventing new things and not building better stuff. (obviously, they still produce some innovation and growth due to sheer size, but it is proportionally worse)
To confidently face the west, the status quo where China allows far too much internal criticism and pro foreign voices must be stopped. Without freedom, the country will not grow, but without authority, the country will not be able to fight.
A mixture of both systems is needed, having freedoms today is pointless if the west will invade and take them away tomorrow anyways. Instead, having a little less freedom, working towards reducing the freedom of unfriendly nations up to and including occupying them like the west does, means that in the long run, as long as the government stays true to its original vision, the controls can be slowly scaled back once the western threat is ended, resulting for more freedom not only in China, but among the colonized.