Miscellaneous News

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator

“Thais will prove that ballot is stronger than the bullets, back like how president Abraham Lincoln said 200 years ago, will happen in Thailand this year,” Pita said, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

Educated at Harvard and MIT, Pita’s US experience may make it easier for Washington to engage with Bangkok, which enjoys good relations with the Pentagon.

Some, however, suspected Pita was intentionally put up as a frontman to give the MFP a more acceptable “centrist” image while much more radical members lurk in the background.

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
MAGA peeps are complete amateurs at subversion. You got thousands "storming" the Capitol, and what did they do? Take selfies and souvenirs from Pelosi's office.

Even the HK rioters in the exact same scenario had more balls than them and did actual damage -
The United States, Britain, and Taiwan united to incite and support, and the power is certainly great. Don't forget the continuous flow of financial support. Protesters can get money by standing on the street, and if they dare to attack the police, they will get even more money.
Most importantly, these protesters are actually tools for opposition lawmakers, with many civil servants, legal professionals, and lawmakers providing political cover for these thugs.

MAGA is completely different. They fell into a carefully set trap, without rigorous planning and clear goals, and Trump betrayed them.
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Looks like the US and vassals are getting tired of the Ukrainian proxy quagmire...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

U.S. officials are planning for the growing possibility that the Russia-Ukraine war will turn into a frozen conflict that lasts many years — perhaps decades — and joins the ranks of similar lengthy face-offs in the Korean peninsula, South Asia and beyond.

The options discussed within the Biden administration for a long-term “freeze” include where to set potential lines that Ukraine and Russia would agree not to cross, but which would not have to be official borders. The discussions — while provisional — have taken place across various U.S. agencies and in the White House.

It’s a scenario that may prove the most realistic long-term outcome given that neither Kyiv nor Moscow appear inclined to ever admit defeat. It’s also becoming increasingly likely amid the growing sense within the administration that an upcoming Ukrainian counteroffensive won’t deal a mortal blow to Russia.

A frozen conflict — in which fighting pauses but neither side is declared the victor nor do they agree that the war is officially over — also could be a politically palatable long-term result for the United States and other countries backing Ukraine.

It would mean the number of military clashes would fall, the costs of supporting Kyiv also likely would drop, and public attention to the war would wane.

“We are planning for the long term, whether it looks frozen or thawed,” said a U.S. official familiar with the Biden administration’s discussions on Ukraine. The official said such planning is a growing focus of the administration, whereas in past months “it was all about the urgent and short-term.”

Two other U.S. officials and a former Biden administration official confirmed that an extended freeze in fighting is one possibility for which the U.S. is preparing. U.S. officials also are thinking through the long-term security ties Washington will have with Kyiv, as well as Ukraine’s relationship with the NATO military alliance.

“There’s a school of thought that says, ‘Oh, the Ukrainians have to have [the city of] Mariupol and Azov Sea access.’ There’s others less hung up about the placement of the lines as long as Ukraine is secure going into the future,” the former administration official said, describing the internal conversations.

Such discussions remain in early stages, with the U.S. officials stressing that the war will remain hot for quite some time and that the Biden administration is intent on providing Ukraine with the weapons and support it needs to push the Russians out of as much territory as possible.

Still, even the suggestion of such planning could undermine Ukrainian leaders’ confidence in America’s continued commitment to their cause, especially given agitation among some Republicans to lessen support for Kyiv.

A fifth person, a senior Biden administration official speaking on behalf of the White House, said an array of contingency plans are being weighed, but the situation is fluid and the only safe prediction is that Russia will not conquer Ukraine. Like others interviewed, the official was granted anonymity to describe sensitive issues.

While many U.S. officials avoid publicly talking about how the Russia-Ukraine conflict will evolve, Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley has repeatedly predicted that it will end in negotiations, not a military victory for either side.

And the makeup of recent military aid packages to Ukraine reflects the Biden administration’s shift to a longer-term strategy, a Defense Department official said.

The amount of equipment sent directly from existing U.S. stockpiles has steadily diminished over the past few months, while the packages of aid used to purchase new weapons from industry — a process that can take months to years — has increased.

The Biden administration recently transferred $300 million worth of weapons from existing U.S. stockpiles, primarily ammunition, while providing $1.2 billion to purchase more complex weapons, such as air defenses, from industry.

At the moment, Ukraine is preparing a counteroffensive against Russia, although the timing remains unclear. In recent days, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has suggested the counteroffensive would be delayed because Ukraine still needed more weapons from its Western partners, while also saying “the first important steps will be taken soon.”

U.S. officials expect fighting to continue even after the counteroffensive.

In the medium-term, many expect a stalemate, during which fighting continues but neither side gains much ground, or a war of attrition, which involves both sides trying to wreak massive losses of personnel and equipment on the other in the hopes the adversary will collapse.

None of the administration officials who spoke to POLITICO would offer specifics about how the U.S. would handle a years-long war or describe the exact depth of planning for a frozen conflict — information that’s largely classified. One U.S. official stressed that the administration has always planned for both long-term and short-term possibilities.

The longer the fight drags on, the more likely Russia and Ukraine will feel international and domestic pressure to negotiate a ceasefire, an armistice or another legal mechanism to halt, if not officially end, the war.

Some U.S. officials and analysts say one rough model could be the Korean War. Active fighting in that conflict ended with an armistice in 1953, but, even 70 years later, the war has not been formally declared over.

“A Korea-style stoppage is certainly something that’s been discussed by experts and analysts in and out of government” when it comes to Ukraine, the former Biden administration official said. “It’s plausible, because neither side would need to recognize any new borders and the only thing that would have to be agreed is to stop shooting along a set line.”

Ukraine wants to join NATO, and the military alliance’s secretary-general has said its members agree that eventually it will.

If Ukraine’s NATO membership bid stalls, such guarantees could range from a NATO-style Article 5 mutual defense deal to Israel-style arms deals with Ukraine as a deterrent against Russia.

At a minimum, some current and former U.S. officials say, Ukraine’s military must get special attention. That could include making sure Ukraine’s weapons and equipment are compatible with those of NATO countries and conducting joint training, even if Kyiv isn’t in the military alliance.

Other questions to consider in such circumstances include whether it is worth bringing in a multinational peacekeeping force.

If active armed conflict ceases, the costs to the United States and other Ukrainian partners likely will fall over time. “It’s cheaper to arm a country that isn’t expending the weapons every day,” the former Biden administration official said.

If a ceasefire or other type of stoppage holds long enough, attention from the public to the war also is likely to fade. That could ease political pressure on Western capitals from critics of the effort to help Kyiv. But it could also mean less of a push from those capitals to resolve the conflict once and for all.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Looks like the US and vassals are getting tired of the Ukrainian proxy quagmire...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They will just toss that conflict aside and said it have done his purpose of slowing Russia grow and severe EU market for Russia. 6 months after, US citizens will not even remember the conflict.
 
Last edited:

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
There won't be a freeze like in South Korea. Do not expect any armistice unless Ukraine disarms and becomes neutral.
The opportunity for that was the Minsk Accords. But Ukraine blew its chance.
It will just become Gaza Strip 2.0 at the current rate. Every so often it will get bombed.
 

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

South Korea finds itself embroiled in an all-out gender war – and it keeps getting worse. The animosity between Korean men and women has reached a point where some women are outright refusing to date, marry and have kids with men – a phenomenon known as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The article described foreign women who traveled to Korea after becoming enamored of the idea of dating Korean men from watching Korean television dramas. I pointed out that since the tourists’ fantasies were based on fictional characters, some of them ended up disappointed with the Korean men they dated in real life.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

South Korea finds itself embroiled in an all-out gender war – and it keeps getting worse. The animosity between Korean men and women has reached a point where some women are outright refusing to date, marry and have kids with men – a phenomenon known as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

The article described foreign women who traveled to Korea after becoming enamored of the idea of dating Korean men from watching Korean television dramas. I pointed out that since the tourists’ fantasies were based on fictional characters, some of them ended up disappointed with the Korean men they dated in real life.

Would this be an example of soft power making you soft?
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

South Korea finds itself embroiled in an all-out gender war – and it keeps getting worse. The animosity between Korean men and women has reached a point where some women are outright refusing to date, marry and have kids with men – a phenomenon known as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
That's contemporary American values right there: the gender war. Although to be fair, this phenomenon of women opting not to marry is not new in developed Asia societies. But when it is mixed with American values, South Korea's gender war could get a whole lot more serious. Maybe in more advanced stages, we might see some LGBT stuff starting to go mainstream.

The article described foreign women who traveled to Korea after becoming enamored of the idea of dating Korean men from watching Korean television dramas. I pointed out that since the tourists’ fantasies were based on fictional characters, some of them ended up disappointed with the Korean men they dated in real life.
Many young women from SEA aspired to date those 'handsome' Korean men that they see on TV. They thought that all South Korean men are just so sexy. Then they realize how the average South Korean man truly looked and behave. Then they learned that those 'handsome' Korean men they saw on TV, they were not born with those looks. Welcome to reality, ladies.
 

Dark Father

Junior Member
Registered Member

Papua New Guinea to sign security pact with US, PM says​


Papua New Guinea will sign a security pact with the United States that gives American troops access to the Pacific nation's ports and airports, its leader said Thursday.

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


There are so many 'leaks' these days that it's very obvious that they are deliberately leaked from government officials to connected networks of journalist staffing the Anglophone media and think tanks. Also no wonder that 99% of the globe was colonized or came under the thumb of Europeans and their nephews on the American continent for centuries upon centuries. I mean witness at how easily they can access a plethora of whole nations like doing a picknick in a park nearby with the highest government approval.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia’s first-ever wheeled self-propelled howitzer, the 2S43 Malva, has successfully completed trials and will enter service, Director of Uralvagonzavod Aleksandr Potapov said on Wednesday.
Not exactly breaking news. Its been coming already for awhile. Russia is officially adopting the wheeled SPH, Following the likes of the French CAESAR and the Chinese PCL-181.

Yes, the Malva should soon join [the troops]. Everything is fine with it,” Potapov told TASS news agency on the sidelines of the MILEX-2023 arms expo in Minsk, Belarus.

Equipped with a 152-mm gun, the Malva (Mallow) is designed to fire at a wide range of targets, including enemy artillery batteries and armored convoys. It is more mobile and less expensive to produce than tracked systems.
This shows that the European and Chinese mass-adoption of the wheeled SPH is well justified. For Russia to accelerate the adoption of the Malva, even with the Koalitsiya-SV already in production during the Ukraine War. Its a strong sign of approval for the wheeled SPH on the modern battlefield. Wheeled SPHs are much cheaper to produce and maintain than tracked systems. They are also an upgrade over towed artillery pieces. Hence, a very practical system for the modern battlefield.

Its supposed to be a no-brainer. But a number of major militaries have not adopted them yet. The US military being the most obvious one. Even the Russians preferred their traditional tracked systems up until recently.
 
Top