you dont even understand meaning of quality of life ( there minute things that i can go into that will make it offtopic) and the second point is highlighted is Soft Power.
I know and use the publically accepted definition. I don't use your self-invented bullshit definition for quality of life and I don't use your confused 5 year old definition of soft/hard power. I debate by publically accepted definitions, not your made-up ones.
you should not use those old terms of First and Third world. as there places that are third world in First world and there places in third world that are better than First world. No one can be at every place at all the times but when you have wealth than you can enjoy more first world living.
OK, then advanced/developed economy. Same conclusion. Your attempts to show that the quality of life in poor third world countries with low GDP and negligible technology and equal or superior to that in the US and Western Europe go against common sense and I will not let you worm into them. The oppertunities that are offered to the talented in advanced economies is unrivaled by what they can attain at home in a third world country.
If i am interacting with your economy to have some financial gain than that economy is hard power but if i am interacting with you and knowingly make losses than that economy has a soft power. its voluntarily attraction.
No, if you are making losses, then you are failing at business. Nobody goes somewhere to open a business meant to lose money. That's an imaginary action for imaginary soft power.
These countries have there own Soft power and it is manifested in many ways.
Yeah, for example, Japan has its anime. It makes some money, but on the global stage, then interests collide, it has absolutely no effect on Japan eating America's shit and taking orders. Soft power is useless.
US is not telling people to move to Spain
Totally random sentence connected to nothing.
not every one can enjoy soft power of Switzerland but if you are wealthy or skilled enough than you can.
Yeah, exactly, soft power is for other people to enjoy. It is not a real power that can force anything in any conflict of interest, which is what's important. Everything is easy and merry when there is no conflict. In other words, soft power is only "useful" when there is nothing to be useful for.
life can become comfortable in Cameroon. search on you tube many nice living places including new apartments complexes with separate pools for kids and adults. Cameroon gets scholarships and US has exchange programe with them. as i said almost all countries get opportunities and that is creating soft power. It is not all about economics. its about people going there and living among them. what is that Green Card diversity lottery?
LOLOLOL This stupid crap again. You want to argue that the quality of life in Camaroon is equal to that of the US/Western Europe? Everybody will laugh you out of the room. What is your point going on off topic nonsense again?
Developing nations GDP growth are higher with less burdensome regulations thats why so many people from developing world has access to education in West. that never happened in history. it is all due to increase wealth and education standards in developing world.
Yup, that's hard power. That's what people come for. Willingly, but it's hard power, not soft. When you willingly work for money, that's the hard power of money. Your definition is broken again.
so its all about economy. you are indirectly admitting that static economies of West are better than high growth economies of rest of the world.
It's true. Growth of a third world economy is like a little girl's lemonade stand selling more every day. It can grow very quickly but it can also be finished easily, and it was never powerful or admirable. Static Western growth is like Walmart/Apple/Boeing having some bad times. It's still incredibly rich and stable; it has the reserves to eventually pull out of it and everyone is still civil and wearing suits dong daily reports.
.There is no such thing as wealthy and first world.
That might be the most retarded thing you've said yet.
look it cost of things when some thing goes wrong like insurance or dentist.
Make big bucks, spend big bucks. That's wealth circulating in the West. If an Ethiopian gets here, he suddenly finds he can't afford anything. If an American visits Ethiopia, the suddenly finds that everything costs peanuts. As a direct comparison, people in Haiti eat cakes made out of mud just to stave off hunger. Middle-class Americans can easily afford steak every day at the supermarket.
it is old rich people from prior generation that has long life expectancy. I am sure Malaysia is first world. it has good enough infrastructure to beat most of first world . Its soft power that define attraction. UAE has soft power thats why wealthy got attracted despite hot weather. once wealthy gets attracted than you need to provide those first world amenities.
Why did you mention Malaysia? It has no consequence at all in the world. No hard power, no soft "power." At most, it attracts some tourism.
those rocket designers are very limited fields and very few will employee foreigners unless they born there with security clearance. its very rare field. largest class in schools are computer science.
Same thing with computer engineers. They want to go to CalTech, GaTech, MIT, etc... and then work in Silicon valley, and recently, maybe Shenzhen. They have nothing to do at home where there is no environment or tools to grow. They need a powerful (hard power) host like the US or China to develop.
The fact that you brought such rare field example shows that you already lost argument of attraction of soft power and use that limited example of hard power.
Lost argument? To whom, you?? LOLOL You have bad English, wrong definitions, don't even know if hard/soft power refers to countries or aspects of power, and your logic can't stay on topic for 3 sentences. I've never seen a person lose an argument with you, only get tired of your nonsense diarrhea-like babbling.
