Jai Hind
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Allegedly during a meeting between high rank Chinese and Russian military delegates, the Chinese wanted to ask how many warheads would make the Russians uncomfortable, at the same time the Russian wanted to ask how many the Chinese intended to have, after a while both sides decided better not to talk about the issue.
If it goes by according the words "the amount of warheads should match the economic power", 1499 warheads will be my guess.
Last edited:
Japan's role as host was also under question, with 22.8 percent saying they are not confident in the country's ability to lead the talks.
Strong criticism from survivors: Kishida's stance "makes it hard to believe he is elected from Hiroshima."
Just 2.1 percent of respondents said Japan has been able serve as a "bridge" between nuclear and non-nuclear states.
Japan's population projected to
Question is if India will fulfil its obligations under SCO and defend the rest of the continent against Anglo America.
I think it’s more likely for India to pull a Roose Bolton and try to Red Wedding China and Russia.
look at China’s space program and Huawei. Both sanctioned by the anglos. Small wonder ch8na doesn’t care about Anglo American sanctions, even welcomes them. American elites better start thinking about how to “create the right conditions” to even get china to talk to you.
Yes, it does sound misleading to compare the Indian economy today with that of China in 2007. It makes it sound like India is looking like China back in 2007. That is absolutely not the case. While India's GDP size today is comparable to that of China in 2007, it's economy is nothing like China's economy in 2007. China's economy then was just 3 years away from overtaking the Japanese economy. I just don't think that Indian could overtake the Japanese economy anytime soon. India is not deeply integrated into the world economy like China was in the 00s. The world economy can function just fine without India in the picture. There are many better outsourcing alternatives to China that are not India. Many Western brands are not rushing into the Indian market like they were with China back in 00's. While Apple are trying India out now. GM, Ford, Nissan, Carrefour, Holcim, and Lafarge have already left India. That 'massive Indian market' is apparently not profitable enough for MNCs to keep doing business there. Not a good indicator for India's globalization future.
China opened it's first HSR in 2007, while India is nowhere near completing its first HSR within this year. Indians themselves followed the Western narrative to blast the Chinese HSR as 'unprofitable'. So India doesn't look like it's in a hurry to massively upgrade it's infrastructure. China is constantly on an infrastructure building spree since the 90s, while India has been talking more, and delivering comparatively very little.
In terms of education. This is where the cheerleaders for India should actually worry. Instead of implementing serious education programs, India under the BJP is focused more into religious education. Sometimes even examining students on the topic of the Holy Cow. The quality of STEM research in India has been declining ever since Modi took power. They are now riding on the last legs of the Manmohan-era scientific research. India had gone from developing the failed Kaveri engine in the 90s-00s, to developing electric-tipped Thrishul (Lord Shiva's trident) today. If that is what the JHs call progress, then good for them.
China in the 00s was working in multilateral trade frameworks like the WTO. China's doors are open to businesses from adversaries like Japan and the US, as long as they follow China's rules of no politics, which is actually quite lenient. India's economy today is more protectionist than it was in the 00s. More arbitrary punishments, more red tape, and more barriers. Its transforming more into a gangster-like business environment. India turned away the BRI, declining massive development and FDI opportunities. India turned away RCEP, isolating its economy from the rest of Asia. The US has recently emerged as India's largest trading partner, no longer China. India has chosen to tie its economy closer to the US. But then India also wants to attempt dedolarization to promote its Rupee. So good luck to both of them.
So while India's GDP is comparable to China's in 2007. India's future economic prospects are not ;looking positive indeed. Unlike China in 2007, India is not on the path to super economic growth anytime soon. It looks like there will be more stagnation, and possibly even some decline. But most Indians are actually very optimistic about India's future. So, we should be happy for them.
With the way things are going with Modi administration, I actually think 30 years is far too optimistic. Closer to 40 years. That is, it would take India roughly 40 years to reach 2023 PRC in economic, technological, human and cultural development.
Unfortunately, China is not going to freeze in time for 40 years. It will continue industrializing and developing at the fastest pace any civilization has developed in human history. In 40 years China may be close to type 1 civilization.
Let's compare India to 2000 China.
In 2000, China had:
1. SMIC which was a 180 nm fab - leading edge at the time.
2. Tencent already came out with QQ, the first domestic social media
5. Alibaba
4. BYD
5. Baidu
6. Huawei
7. ZTE
8. J-10
So does India today have a leading edge semiconductor fab, domestic social media, domestic ecommerce, domestic cars, domestic search engine, domestic telecom and domestic 4th gen medium fighter?
At the current moment, China doesn't seem to pursue an attempted nuclear victory posture, it is just content to sit at MAD with USA like in the past.
China's most cutting edge first strike technologies can also be used in conventional strike, and it is probably in the conventional domain where Beijing will focus.
MAD can only protect the core lands of the country, which is a fluent concept but nevertheless real. For example, if America occupied Taiwan or some random SCS island, it would be commonly accepted that China would not nuclear attack over it. Likewise, if China occupied Guam and Okinawa, America would be commonly accepted as not initiating nuclear attacks over it.
The battlefields of the future will be not on the core territory of nuclear powers, but on disputed areas and inside subordinate countries such as Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, the Koreas etc, with nuclear weapons acting as a guardrail.
Indian hackers have reportedly attempted a cyber attack on the Malaysian Central Bank.
LOL!
India is also apparently also in a Cyber War with Indonesia:
Cyber attacks happens regularly. But in India, its apparently something that is worthy of national pride. So Indians apparently think that messing around with Indonesia and Malaysia is something to be proud of. No prizes as to why India is not very popular in amongst most of SEA.
So is this part of India's masterplan to wants to win friends in the SEA?
I wasn't aware that Malaysia and India are in a Cyber War against each other. Have the Indians truly verified that those hackers were really Malaysians? Hackers are notorious for using false IP addresses.
LOL!
That's how you know that the "Kerala Cyber Xtractors" are really from India.
India is also apparently also in a Cyber War with Indonesia:
Cyber attacks happens regularly. But in India, its apparently something that is worthy of national pride. So Indians apparently think that messing around with Indonesia and Malaysia is something to be proud of. No prizes as to why India is not very popular in amongst most of SEA.
Everyone hacks everyone. The only difference is that the Jai Hinders are stupid enough to publicly admit it