Lethe
Captain
Do you really think the funding agencies for social sciences in the west have no political positions? By your logic, western interpretation of the history of regions outside the west is all ground truth, since they supposedly have no skin in the game.
What is orientalism?
That doesn't follow at all, because there are many regions and issues that are politically laden for western academics operating within institutions having particular biases, funding for research in certain directions, etc. The question of the Proto-Indo-European homeland and the broader question of how India was populated is not one of those issues. If you disagree then you should explain where the bias or conflict of interest lies and how it translates to favouring one hypothesis for the Proto-Indo-European homeland over another.
Last edited: